search for: tippering

hi All, Ubuntu 12.04 and glusterfs 3.3.1. root at tipper:/data# df -h /data Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on tipper:/data 2.0T 407G 1.6T 20% /data root at tipper:/data# du -sh . 10G . root at tipper:/data# du -sh /data 13G /data It's quite confused. I also tried to free up the space by stopping the machine (actually LXC VM) with no lock. After umounting the space

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13266 Bug ID: 13266 Summary: Writing of files to Apple's new "AP" controller model SSD's takes 4x longer. Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: x64 OS: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5

Is it me, or is my USB not being recognized properly? tipper nut # ./tripplite_usb -DDD -u root -a tipper -x vendor=09AE Network UPS Tools - Tripp Lite OMNIVS and SMARTPRO driver 0.6 (2.0.4) Warning: This is an experimental driver. Some features may not function correctly. debug level is '3' Checking device (0000/0000) (002/001) - VendorID: 0000 - ProductID: 0000 - Manufacturer: Linux

Here's a question for ecologists on the r-help list-- I'm addressing this to ecologists in particular because they're most likely to be familiar with the equation in question but I'll be happy to discuss the problem with anyone who's willing to take a whack at it. I'm trying to write a function to calculate the large sample variance of species richness estimates by

Please excuse my ignorance as I''m a linux newbie. Basically I have a setup of an adsl ethernet modem (nated and then everything forwarded to the external ip of my Mandrake mnf firewall) connected to the mnf firewall which then connects to the lan. internet <--> adsl modem <--> mnf firewall <--> lan There''s only 2 nics in the mnf firewall so it''s a

For those of you running SuSE 9.1, I do not recommend upgrading to 9.2 at this time. Refer to http://shorewall.net/myfiles.htm for information on my configuration: a) On Ursa: 1) After the upgrade, both of the NICs were recognized as "configured" in YAST yet neither of them would start; ifup claimed that no configuration could be found for either interface. Only got them running

Hello ! I have a performance issue with Kernel 2.6.X and policy match support as suggested in http://shorewall.net/IPSEC-2.6.html. My IPSEC performance doesn''t exeed about 30kbyte/sec even if my downlink is 1024kbit/sec and should reach more than 100kbyte/sec. No, its not the cpu''s performance (AMD Barton 2500+) and no it''s not the gateway (CELERON 600 Mhz) on the

I am trying to connect two workstations (CentOS 3&4) directly using a straight through cat 5e cable with a crossover adapter on one of the ends. Both hosts have gigabit-capable ethernet card. According to lspci host 1 has: 03:0e.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82545EM Gigabit Ethernet Controller (Copper) (rev 01) and host 2 has: 05:00.0 Ethernet controller: Marvell Technology Group

Hi Guys, Had a samba server up and running on a sparc running 2.6. All was well with the world then I had to move it to another subnet. Since then I have not been able to connect or see it in the browser list and keep seeing the following error in smb.log which I can't find an answer to. The error is ERROR: root did not create the semaphore [1999/12/28 10:04:13, 0]

hi All, # gluster volume info data Volume Name: data Type: Distribute Volume ID: d74ab958-1599-4e82-9358-1eea282d4025 Status: Started Number of Bricks: 1 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1: tipper:/mnt/brick1 Options Reconfigured: nfs.export-dirs: on nfs.export-volumes: off nfs.export-dir: /install nfs.port: 2049 nfs.ports-insecure: off nfs.disable: off nfs.mount-udp: on nfs.addr-namelookup: off

In /etc/shorewall/masq I have: eth0 eth1 eth0 vmnet1 eth0 vmnet8 ------------- eth0 is my default route to the Linksys router connected to the cable modem. eth1 is my connection to 192.168.1 subnet and it is the gateway for all other machines on this subnet. My routing table is: # netstat -nr Kernel IP routing table Destination

I believe that 2.4.0 is about ready to be sent out the door. I''ve made a couple of small changes since RC2 but I don''t believe that they warrant another RC. There remains the issue of what to do about support for Shorewall 2.0 given that 2.2 has only been available since March. It would be my recommendation to make 2.4 the new "stable" release but continue to

Hi there, For years I've been using the ext3 file system without to think that it can ever gets broken so bad. This was until last week when a box that I have running Linux from a SanDisk CF went down. Since then I am struggling with this CF trying to understand what is happening. The CF is SanDisk ultra II 1GB. On this I have 4 partitions all of them with ext3: boot / swap

I currently have a 7x1.5tb raidz1. I want to add "phase 2" which is another 7x1.5tb raidz1 Can I add the second phase to the first phase and basically have two raid5''s striped (in raid terms?) Yes, I probably should upgrade the zpool format too. Currently running snv_104. Also should upgrade to 110. If that is possible, would anyone happen to have the simple command lines to