search for: timescales

On 4/12/06, Ted Mittelstaedt <tedm@toybox.placo.com> wrote: > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Ted Mittelstaedt [mailto:tedm@toybox.placo.com] > >Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 6:04 PM > >To: Nikolas Britton > >Cc: Harrison Peter CSA BIRKENHEAD; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >Subject: RE: Timescale for 6.1-RELEASE... > > >

Hello, I am trying to plot time-series data with certain weeks highlighted using symbols. require(ggplot2) #plotting time series data timescale <- seq(as.Date("01/01/09","%m/%d/%y"), length.out=12, by=7) data.all <- data.frame( id = c(rep('111',12),rep('222',12),rep('333',12)), week=c(timescale,timescale,timescale),

Hello all, Last year I submitted a bug regarding the use of 'parallel_for_each' and Windows Concurrency Library. We have found that when compiling in Visual Studio 2015 and 2017 with /MTd, the use of 'concurrency::parallel_for_each' can cause unhandled exceptions when the program is exiting. https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34976 After having some difficulty clarifying this

Hi all, I've been experimenting with Dovecot; tests with Maildir seemed to work fine. However, now I'm trying with mbox folders, and I'm having a problem where I do not get an INBOX listed using pine. Outlook Express and IMP show it fine. I snooped part of the session, which appears to go like this (it is slightly garbled, sorry -- I couldn't get rawlog to work by creating

> On Oct 28, 2016, at 1:59 AM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote: > > On 28 Oct 2016, at 09:46, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: >> >>> On Oct 28, 2016, at 1:21 AM, David Chisnall via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> >>> On 28 Oct 2016, at 02:43, ジョウェットジェームス <b3i4zz1gu1 at

Hello. I am Liu Chi(??) from Peking University, China. I am planning to join GSoC. I am interested in Xapian and looking forward to find something interesting in GSoC 2014 Project Ideas List. The topic of "Clustering of Search Results" looks interesting and I think it suits me. I have been involved in a project that aims to clustering tweets based on the text similarity and user

To Danardonos concern of splitting time for records with delayed entry: This can fairly easily be accomodated, by simply splitting time in small intervals of time since entry into the study, and then compute the value of the other timescales for each of these e.g.: current.age <- time.from.entry + age.at.entry but the cut on the other timescales will not be exactly where you may want them to be, but this should be of minor importance in real life. This approach will also make it clearer what really is going on. The effect of ea...

On Wed, 2020-10-28 at 14:40 -0300, Joshua C. Colp wrote: > This is not yet fixed, but is being worked on. I have it as a > security issue currently out of caution (although I don't think we'll > treat it as one after further investigation). Right OK, thanks. Do you have any idea of the sort of timescale, and whether it'll be available as a patch that we can apply to our

Hi all Is there a list of criterias for a 1.0 release of Wine? I couldn't find one. I was looking in the developers mailing list. But there's only a collection of bugs that must be fixed. An important question for me is: How many native DLLs will be accepted for a 1.0 version? I don't get the point that installing _multiple _native libraries to make an application installable

Hi, I have the following situation: I'm designing a solution for an organization with two Active Directory forests. The forests do not have a trust relationship, and there is no chance to get them to move to a trust relationship (at least within a reasonable timescale). I need to set up a fileserver than both sets of users can access, with Windows authentication. I could host this on a UNIX

On 28 Oct 2016, at 10:10, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > >> >> On Oct 28, 2016, at 1:59 AM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote: >> >> On 28 Oct 2016, at 09:46, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Oct 28, 2016, at 1:21 AM, David Chisnall via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at

On 28 Oct 2016, at 09:46, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > >> On Oct 28, 2016, at 1:21 AM, David Chisnall via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> On 28 Oct 2016, at 02:43, ジョウェットジェームス <b3i4zz1gu1 at docomo.ne.jp> wrote: >>> >>> I would need to sum up all the rules and ABIs and sizes for all the targets I need

I am trying to plot 2 time series on the same graph. For example, X1 is the vector of dates and times, its class is POSIXt. Y1 is an environmental parameter, e.g. salinity. X2 is a second vector of dates and times, also of class POSIXt. X2 has a different length than X1, but they have the exact same range. Y2 is another environmental parameter, e.g. stream flow rate. My approach is

> On Oct 28, 2016, at 1:21 AM, David Chisnall via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On 28 Oct 2016, at 02:43, ジョウェットジェームス <b3i4zz1gu1 at docomo.ne.jp> wrote: >> >> I would need to sum up all the rules and ABIs and sizes for all the targets I need and generate different IR for each, am I correct? > > This is a long-known limitation of LLVM IR

Thank you so much for tracking down such a tricky issue. I agree that we should disable it. Should we just delete the ifdefs? We could in theory disable it just for debug builds, but that could create some hard to reproduce bugs. Cheers, Rafael Owen Reynolds via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > Hello all, > > Last year I submitted a bug regarding the use of

...e its competitors. Investment in the right people and a realisation that BPO requires waiting for profits for two, possibly three years, does not compute. Unlike its competitors. Is it that the suppliers are over-selling their capabilities or is it caused by resistance internally pushing out saving timescales? Is it that the suppliers are over-selling their capabilities or is it caused by resistance internally pushing out saving timescales?

> On Oct 28, 2016, at 1:21 AM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote: > > On 28 Oct 2016, at 02:43, ジョウェットジェームス <b3i4zz1gu1 at docomo.ne.jp> wrote: >> >> I would need to sum up all the rules and ABIs and sizes for all the targets I need and generate different IR for each, am I correct? > > This is a long-known limitation of LLVM IR and

Thanks for the help on the translucent dots. What would be the best method for creating a map of the facility? I looked into map* in the libraries and didn't find anything on creating the maps, just using them. Thanks again... Shawn Way, PE Engineering Manager sway at tanox.com -----Original Message----- From: Prof Brian Ripley [mailto:ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk] Sent: Thursday, October

At our facility we have multiple sample points that are sampled on any given day. What I would like to do is create a map of the facility with the sample points (and point labels) and when we have out of specification results, place a transparent dot over the area on the map. As the number of OOS results builds up, I envision the dot getting darker. Are there any packages out there that can aid

I did some digging and found a thread from 2011 talking about how to subclass Xapian::PostingSource in order to incorporate the date or recency of a document in its weighting: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.search.xapian.general/8849/focus=8856 As in that thread, I want to be clear that I don't want to sort by date, but rather incorporate date information into the score by which I