search for: timesaving

Is there a shortcut for this: "http://foo.com":http://foo.com ? Thanks, ---John

Thanks for the tip. That could be a huge timesaver. But it lists only a single package for versions 0.90.1-2 ... how does that work? David On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 at 12:27, Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> wrote: > > On 30 July 2018 at 05:35, David Hugh-Jones wrote: > | Hi guys, > | > | Perhaps someone here can help. > | > | I am trying to build versions of R 1 for

...move. The blocked senders list is of limited use, most spammers fake the FROM address and change it quickly. Any full email addresses you put on the Blocked Sender list are not likely to be used again. But with a single click toolbar button it can be worth the small effort. _______ OFFICE 2003 TIMESAVING TECHNIQUES FOR DUMMIES Woody's book is available now - click here for a list of online booksellers http://www.woodyswatch.com/l.asp?0764567616 or try our new online store http://shop.woodyswatch.com 3. SHORTCUT OF THE WEEK Jump straight to the File | Open dialog box by simply pressing: Ctr...

For expats from other languages, what''s the next best step after the Agile Web Dev book: Rails Recipes or Ruby for Rails? Thanks, -- Austin -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

...get stonewalled. Makes us wonder how serious Microsoft really is about software piracy. If you want a good and legal deal on Office 2003 it is still hard to go past the Student and Teacher Editions we talked about in http://www.woodyswatch.com/office/archtemplate.asp?v9-n17 _______ OFFICE 2003 TIMESAVING TECHNIQUES FOR DUMMIES Woody's book is available now - click here for a list of online booksellers http://www.woodyswatch.com/l.asp?0764567616 or try our new online store http://shop.woodyswatch.com _______ 4. PUBLISHER 2003 FOR $50 Much as I hate mail-in rebates, the bottom line on this of...

...er like Winzip 9.0. WinZip Companion for Outlook costs US$19 and there is a 45 free trial download. http://www.winzip.com/prodpagewzcou.htm It works with Outlook 2002 and 2003 - also Outlook 2000 but the latter only if do not use MS Word as your email editor (aka WordMail). _______ OFFICE 2003 TIMESAVING TECHNIQUES FOR DUMMIES Woody's book is available now - click here for a list of online booksellers http://www.woodyswatch.com/l.asp?0764567616 or try our new online store http://shop.woodyswatch.com _______ 4. EIGHTH STAR RISES Version 8 of MS Office wannabe, Star Office has now been released...

...t the litigious company hasn't to my knowledge ever taken similar action, which shows considerable good sense and restraint. Microsoft exec's deserve some credit for that and, for once, could teach a lesson to Apple about accepting the inevitable and public relations. _______ OFFICE 2003 TIMESAVING TECHNIQUES FOR DUMMIES Woody's book is available now - click here for a list of online booksellers http://www.woodyswatch.com/l.asp?0764567616 or try our new online store http://shop.woodyswatch.com ________ 7. ROD'S BUS IN SYDNEY In the 'nothing to do with Office and not a paid promo...

I just downloaded and installed Ruby on Rails to a Win XP SP1 OS using XAMPP. I started going through the beginner tutorials at rubyonrails.org. It appears as though Ruby on Rails is operating properly until I try to access the MySQL database I created for it. Then the browser displays a detailed statement created by Ruby. It is titled: ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid in Recipe#New Recipe is

I just wanted to publicly thank Thomas Eastep for his wonderful work on shorewall. I hope he gets a much needed rest and returns happy and healthy! May he also go forth and prosper with his great knowledge .... His work deserves to be listed at the top of those lists of top Free Open Source Software success stories. Happy New Year Tom! PS- Thanks also to everyone else on the shorewall project. May

On 6/18/06, Iain Haslam <iainhaslam at gmail.com> wrote: > > BTW, I really like the new > > > > ```source > > code > > ``` > > > > syntax. *Huge* timesaver. > > Continuing this particular off-topicness: Lucas, are you aware or in > favour of the bc(code). syntax already being used for this [1]? I > mentioned it previously on the list [2],

Hi, for whoever cares RoRED 0.9.3.7 is released on http://www.plasmacode.com . There are many improvements (UTF-8 support,code proposal,etc..). Free as always. Suggestions for improvements are welcome. Best regards, Marcus. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Hey all, If you''re like me and use git submodules heavily (I vendor everything, and every plugin is a submodule), you might like to hear about code published this morning to make it easier to manage multiple git submodules in a shared-server environment. It''s imaginatively titled ''git-rake'', and it does Good Things like: * aggregates submodule commit logs into

I''m trying to use Rails on Windows 2000. I''m running into an immediate problem in that all the files generated by Rails use the UNIX end-of-line convention instead of the Windows end-of-line convention. A non-compliant end-of-line convention will break any number of tools I may wish to use to manage these files. Is there a way to get Rails to emit Windows-compliant

According to the mongrel_cluster.yml file you provided, you''re starting only 14 mongrels, but in your proxy balancer config you have 30 mongrels listed on ports 21000 - 21029. In this scenario, if apache tries to proxy to any ports higher than 21014 then you''ll get a proxy error as a mongrel doesn''t exist on that port. Or am I missing something? -----Original

I''ve posted this to rails-deployment as well. I have to administer a medium size rails app (1''5 million requests each day), recently I''ve switched from lighttpd + fcgi to apache + mongrel. In the following lines I am going to describe the platform: All machines are running Debian Etch, with 4 gb ram and dual core intel32 processors. Web server runs debian''s

I have a Sortable that''s working like a charm, but now I would like to be able to drop objects from that Sortable onto a Droppable that''s not part of my Sortable. I just did a small test page where it didn''t work, so my first question has to be "is this supposed to work?", before I dig too deep into it. "accept" for the droppable is set to the

Hello friends , I have a clear method here :: def create @invoiceitems = Invoiceitems.new(params[:invoiceitems]) @invoiceitems["invoice_id"] = params[:id] if @invoiceitems.save flash[:notice] = ''Invoiceitems was successfully created.'' redirect_to :action => ''new'',:id => params[:id] else render :action =>

Don''t get me wrong, JavaScript/Ajax helpers in Rails are a huge timesaver and they have helped me to finally overcome my irrational aversion to js libraries like prototype and such. However, all this goodness seems to come at quiet a price. The resulting code is littered with inline JS, including ubiquitous script tags and onload attributes etc.. It seems that just when i found

On 25 February 2016 at 12:46, Joachim Durchholz via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I'm repeating myself but not they are not identical on the git side. Not for > people without push access to the main repo anyway. We're talking about the people with commit access to the main repo. No commit access still needs someone with commit access to push/merge. >

Am 25.02.2016 um 14:41 schrieb Renato Golin: > On 25 February 2016 at 12:46, Joachim Durchholz via llvm-dev >> What workflow are you comparing this to, if a pull request is a penalty? > > Today, 100s of people commit directly. Ah. I wasn't aware of that, I thought LLVM had a gatekeeper model. > In a GitHub style, 100s of > people will have to wait for a merge from a few