search for: tiemann

...xunit="samples". Workaround is to use xunit="time" instead: sawtooth(110,duration=1/100,samp.rate=sample_rate,xunit="time") I looked at the code but found it to be opaque. -- Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity. On November 12, 2017 6:15:45 AM PST, Michael Tiemann <mdtiemann at gmail.com> wrote: >My tuneR sawtooth wave function generator is broken. > >When I use the sine function, I get exactly what I expect: a sine wave >whose frequency is defined by the freq parameter. In particular, >higher frequencies have shorter wavelengths (more...

My tuneR sawtooth wave function generator is broken. When I use the sine function, I get exactly what I expect: a sine wave whose frequency is defined by the freq parameter. In particular, higher frequencies have shorter wavelengths (more cycles per second means shorter waves). When I create a sawtooth wave, the opposite seems to occur: higher frequencies result in longer waves. But that?s not

...case others have more advanced equipment and an interest in testing it out. Hope this helps! BTW, if you are curious about the bats, you can check here: http://blogs.cnet.com/8301-13507_1-9738110-18.html?tag=more I will be writing a follow-up that uses sound and seewave in the next few days. [tiemann at localhost Desktop]$ diff -ru sound-orig/ sound diff -ru sound-orig/man/bits.Rd sound/man/bits.Rd --- sound-orig/man/bits.Rd 2006-02-20 12:50:53.000000000 -0500 +++ sound/man/bits.Rd 2007-07-08 19:36:08.000000000 -0400 @@ -12,13 +12,13 @@ } \arguments{ \item{s}{ a Sample object, or a s...

...is message to the maintainer's email address listed on the signal package, but it bounced. Perhaps somebody on this list has more insight into the signal package than I do (or knows the maintainer's new address): Subject: question about buttord function in R signal module From: Michael Tiemann <michaeltiemann at mac.com> Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2008 07:18:58 -0500 To: tshort at eprisolutions.com Tom, I was trying to compare lowpass and highpass filters and found that the buttord example in the manual worked as expected, namely the $type was "low". But when I reversed the...

...leshoot any kinds of networking problems the box might have, but couldn't find anything... If you want to try to ssh in to the box itself, it is www.cyboards.com. It should give you the same error message as I am getting. Any help you guys can give would be greatly appreciated. Regards, Paul Tiemann //------------- Here's a code snip from the sshconnect.c file below void ssh_exchange_identification() { char buf[256], remote_version[256]; /* must be same size! */ int remote_major, remote_minor, i; int connection_in = packet_get_connection_in(); int connection_out = packet_get_connecti...

...lem I was having in ssh_exchange_identification() function... My fault: I didn't look hard enough in the archives. Turns out that my problem was fixed by adding a line to my hosts.allow file. Again, I'm sorry I didn't research the archives long enough to find the fix myself. :Paul Tiemann

...nd, if that is not a solution, B) accommodate it as best as you can. > True enough. My biggest problem, philosophically at least with RedHat, > is the now unified release: what's good for server users is what > Desktop users get. This goes back to the whole eWeek mis-quote of Michael Tiemann where the whole world said Red Hat was "getting out of the desktop market." In reality, I totally agree that it's really not of any interest to Red Hat to keep trying to _sell_ a _product_ that is geared towards all the endless uses of a consumer/custom desktop. It's _cheaper_ an...

...r in FOSS. I prefer to use the term Freedomware, which doesn't need a definition to those not familiar. ;-> > I would never purchase a shrink-wrapped RedHat were it still available, > nor do I have any need for an SLA, As is your choice. No one at Red Hat is forcing you to do so. Tiemann basically said in not so few words that they don't want you as a consumer, only possibly a user of Fedora Core if you wish. > but I'm very thankful that RedHat fully subscribes to the GPL and makes its > SRPM's available. Which is why, taking everything else away because it'...

Dear list, I am trying to re-analyse something. I do have two time series, one of which (ts.mar) might help explaining the other (ts.anr). In the original analysis, no-one seems to have cared about the data being time-series and they just did OLS. This yielded a strong positive correlation. I want to know if this correlation is still as strong when the autocorrelations are taken into account.

Hi, Is there a CentOS yum repository for mplayer&dependencies? Thanks, Adrian

...l, This message is simple instructions to install Samba + OpenLDAP on FreeBSD (4.7). Hope it would help someone. 1. To keep ports update, better install cvsupit in the beginning mis3# cd /usr/ports/net/cvsupit mis3# make install clean Reference: FreeBSD Unleashed (by Urban and Tiemann), p. 425 2. To use Samba + OpenLDAP with the option "ldap ssl = start_tls" in smb.conf, install the three following packages in order: mis3# cd /usr/ports/security/openssl mis3# make install clean mis3# cd /usr/ports/net/openldap2 mis3# make install clean mis3# cd...

...w a shrink-wrapped Red Hat anything was back in the > days of RH 7, 8 and 9. I even bought some of them to support Red Hat. I have Red Hat Professional Workstation from both RHEL 2.1 and 3. They renamed it (and added volume licenses) the Red Hat Desktop to get the IT media to stop mis-quoting Tiemann that Red Hat _never_ left the desktop. > I'll be good. Has nothing to be with "being good." ;-> I just find that people have an intrinsic feeling that they must define their choice in not only a like of their choice, but a dislike for another. It's not only self-defeatin...

...RHN for the last available versions of > the Red Hat Linux and that suited me just fine. That price is now > ???184, and includes features I don't actually need or want. Again, check out your local CompUSA and look for the shrink wrapped version of RHEL WS for $99. ;-> As Michael Tiemann said (and was mis-quoted), at the volume right now, it is cheaper to give away their time in developing Fedora Core and not charging for it than to make a boxed product like Red Hat Linux. The expectations of support at the volume they sell is just not worth their bother. It's cheaper to give...