search for: thumb2p

...en shared and static versions of the same library exist there is the .dll.a variant. Issues ======= Like more of the gnu suite dlltool was not designed in one build multi target manner. We would have to introduce custom arguments to specify the target, "i686", "x86_64", "thumb2pe" etc. This will most likely break some level of backwards compatibility with the binutils version. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170213/3cd602dd/attachment.html>

...riant. >> >> >> Issues >> ======= >> >> Like more of the gnu suite dlltool was not designed in one build multi >> target manner. >> We would have to introduce custom arguments to specify the target, >> "i686", "x86_64", "thumb2pe" etc. >> This will most likely break some level of backwards compatibility with >> the binutils version. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org >> http://lists.llvm....

...;>> ======= >>>> >>>> Like more of the gnu suite dlltool was not designed in one build multi >>>> target manner. >>>> We would have to introduce custom arguments to specify the target, >>>> "i686", "x86_64", "thumb2pe" etc. >>>> This will most likely break some level of backwards compatibility with >>>> the binutils version. >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> LLVM Developers mailing list >>>&gt...

...t; >>>>>> Like more of the gnu suite dlltool was not designed in one build >>>>>> multi target manner. >>>>>> We would have to introduce custom arguments to specify the target, >>>>>> "i686", "x86_64", "thumb2pe" etc. >>>>>> This will most likely break some level of backwards compatibility >>>>>> with the binutils version. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>&...

...gt; Like more of the gnu suite dlltool was not designed in one build >>>>>>>> multi target manner. >>>>>>>> We would have to introduce custom arguments to specify the target, >>>>>>>> "i686", "x86_64", "thumb2pe" etc. >>>>>>>> This will most likely break some level of backwards compatibility >>>>>>>> with the binutils version. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _____________________________...

...suite dlltool was not designed in one build >>>>>>>>>> multi target manner. >>>>>>>>>> We would have to introduce custom arguments to specify the >>>>>>>>>> target, "i686", "x86_64", "thumb2pe" etc. >>>>>>>>>> This will most likely break some level of backwards compatibility >>>>>>>>>> with the binutils version. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>&g...

...ry exist there is the > .dll.a variant. > > > Issues > ======= > > Like more of the gnu suite dlltool was not designed in one build multi > target manner. > We would have to introduce custom arguments to specify the target, "i686", > "x86_64", "thumb2pe" etc. > This will most likely break some level of backwards compatibility with the > binutils version. > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llv...

...ry exist there is the > .dll.a variant. > > > Issues > ======= > > Like more of the gnu suite dlltool was not designed in one build multi > target manner. > We would have to introduce custom arguments to specify the target, "i686", > "x86_64", "thumb2pe" etc. > This will most likely break some level of backwards compatibility with the > binutils version. > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llv...

...ry exist there is the > .dll.a variant. > > > Issues > ======= > > Like more of the gnu suite dlltool was not designed in one build multi > target manner. > We would have to introduce custom arguments to specify the target, "i686", > "x86_64", "thumb2pe" etc. > This will most likely break some level of backwards compatibility with the > binutils version. > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llv...