search for: thoghts

Hi, Is there a plugin for ROR for bug tracking. I need it for lite use. I thoght using typo or something, but still want to know if there is something. Thanks, Kfir

Hello Elias, Monday, December 15, 2014, 4:13:20 PM, you wrote: EP> Sounds like it might be differences in precision of the timestamp. Could be, thoght the NAS box has the sending system as it's NTP server so their times should be in sync. EP> Check out the `--modify-window` option. Doesn't seem to stop all the folders being listed even though nothing is transferred.

Hello, We have two DCs. One runs Windows 2003 R2, and the other Samba 4.0.5. Forest functional level is Windows 2000 native. I recently demoted (worked flawlessy now, which was a great relief), rebuilt and re-promoted my Samba 4 DC, as my problems that I posted to this list about two monts were still unresolved (see https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2013-February/171898.html), and I thoght

Hello Les, Sunday, December 14, 2014, 7:18:09 PM, you wrote: LM> Folders should only be listed if timestamps or permissions are different. Further experimentation shows this to be the case IF the destination is another local drive. Unfortunately the required destination is a CIFS share, which might change things. -- Best regards, Niamh mailto:niamh at

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Niamh Holding <niamh at fullbore.co.uk> wrote: > Hello Elias, > > Monday, December 15, 2014, 4:13:20 PM, you wrote: > > EP> Sounds like it might be differences in precision of the timestamp. > > Could be, thoght the NAS box has the sending system as it's NTP server so > their times should be in sync. > > EP> Check out

On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 at 11:41 -0000, Niamh Holding wrote: > EP> Sounds like it might be differences in precision of the timestamp. > > Could be, thoght the NAS box has the sending system as it's NTP server so > their times should be in sync. > > EP> Check out the `--modify-window` option. > > Doesn't seem to stop all the folders being listed even though

Hi, I have yet another problem. First let me explain my setup. I used to use pine a lot so there are mbox mailboxes in ~/mail. Recently I added a Maildir too and moved most of the mbox mailboxes into Maildir format. Now I thoght it would be nice to have them all "in line" in Thunderbird so I tried this configuration: namespace private { separator = / prefix =

Hi I change eth1 from realtek to dlink but the centos is showing eth2 instead of eth1 In another version of linux, I can change 70-persistent-net.rules but I check /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules but it doesn't have the file 70-persistent-net.rules please help Thank you Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com

Hello, David. > A few things. > Firstly, I've got a working implementation of the X86ThisCall calling > convention, but I'm unsure how to go about submitting it. > (I'm not really sure how to go about creating patch files etc, but > would like to contribute to the project). I suppose, you've changed X86ISelLowering.cpp, X86*AsmPrinter.cpp, CallingConv.h. Right?

what is the limit on the arp cache entires ?! Does someone have very big LANs with linux-routers ? How big ? (i mean flat L2 network, not segmented) I want to know how much can my net can scale ? thanx _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Hello People I''m new here, so forgive-me for any "newbie talk". My client is running Debian Sarge (Stable), with Shorewall and Webmin. I want to make things easier for them and tried to use the webmin-shorewall module. The thing is - the installed shorewall is 3.0.5 (package from testing) but the webmin module only understands (and builds) the old shorewall 2.x file

Hello. On rsync, version 3.0.9 got this trouble, rsync hung when applying batch file: Sync all files from batch to asr_billing install: - skelet/cfg/ install: - skelet/etc/ install: deleting usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/IPython/external/Itpl.pyc - deleting install: 100% 9.83MB/s - 0 install: 100% 51.39kB/s - usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/dbfpy/utils.pyc install: 100% 86.10kB/s -

Hello. On rsync, version 3.0.9 got this trouble, rsync hung when applying batch file: Sync all files from batch to asr_billing install: - skelet/cfg/ install: - skelet/etc/ install: deleting usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/IPython/external/Itpl.pyc - deleting install: 100% 9.83MB/s - 0 install: 100% 51.39kB/s - usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/dbfpy/utils.pyc install: 100% 86.10kB/s -

There have been several constructive responses to John Sorkin's comment, but none of them are fully satisfactory. Of course, if you know the name of the function you are looking for, there are lots of ways to search — provided that everyone calls the function by a name that matches your search. If you think there might be a function, but you don't know the name, then you have

>VectorClone does more than just mapping a scalar version to a vector one. It builds also the vector version definition by auto-vectorizing the body of the scalar function. To be more precise: VecClone strictly deals with the callee side of the code. Caller side mapping happens in vectorizer (LoopVectorize for the most part, but I don't see why SLPVectorize can't, for example).

>Is this also the case if the user did require lock-step semantic for the code to be correct? Certainly not, but that part is actually beyond OpenMP specification. I suggest looking up ICC's "#pragma simd assert" description and see if the assert feature is something you may be interested in seeing as an extended part of LLVM implementation of OpenMP (declare) simd. Else,

Page 22 of OpenMP 5.0 specification (Lines 13/14): When any thread encounters a simd construct, the iterations of the loop associated with the construct may be executed concurrently using the SIMD lanes that are available to the thread This is the Execution Model. The word here is "may" i.e., not "must". Declare simd is not explicitly mentioned here, but requiring

I think I did misunderstand what you want to do with attributes. This is my bad. Let me try to explain: It seems you want the "vector-variants" attributes (which I could not find with this name in trunk, correct?) to "remember" what vector versions can be created (wrt. validity), assuming a definition is available? Correct? What I was concerned with is the example I sketched

Hi All, The original intend of this thread is to "Expose user provided vector function for auto-vectorization.” I originally proposed to use OpenMP `declare variant` for the sake of using something that is defined by a standard. The RFC itself is not about fully implementing the `declare variant` directive. In fact, given the amount of complication it is bringing, I would like to move the