Hello Keith, Sunday, December 14, 2014, 6:31:20 PM, you wrote: KK> Anyway, you want some combination of the -v and --progress switches. KK> Try each separately, and both together, and see which you like best. Neither! Both switches list the folders being checked even if the contents are unchanged -- Best regards, Niamh mailto:niamh at fullbore.co.uk -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 192 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20141214/16a6e57a/attachment-0001.sig>
On Dec 14, 2014 11:01 AM, "Niamh Holding" <niamh at fullbore.co.uk> wrote:> > Hello Keith, > > Sunday, December 14, 2014, 6:31:20 PM, you wrote: > > KK> Anyway, you want some combination of the -v and --progress switches. > KK> Try each separately, and both together, and see which you like best. > > Neither! > > Both switches list the folders being checked even if the contents are > unchanged >Folders should only be listed if timestamps or permissions are different. -- Les Mikesell Les at gmail.com
rsync -h ... -i, --itemize-changes output a change-summary for all updates ... K -- ? ? Kahlil (Kal) Hodgson GPG: C9A02289 Head of Technology (m) +61 (0) 4 2573 0382 DealMax Pty Ltd
Hello Les, Sunday, December 14, 2014, 7:18:09 PM, you wrote: LM> Folders should only be listed if timestamps or permissions are different. Further experimentation shows this to be the case IF the destination is another local drive. Unfortunately the required destination is a CIFS share, which might change things. -- Best regards, Niamh mailto:niamh at fullbore.co.uk