search for: thies

Signed-off-by: Maarten Maathuis <madman2003 at gmail.com> --- src/nv50_exa.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/nv50_exa.c b/src/nv50_exa.c index 10a3a64..59c198f 100644 --- a/src/nv50_exa.c +++ b/src/nv50_exa.c @@ -431,6 +431,26 @@ NV50EXAUploadSIFC(const char *src, int src_pitch, return TRUE; } +/* Compat defines for pre

That reminds me: Do the web documents reside in a repository somewhere or should I just grab them using wget? 2012/6/14 Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> > wrote: > > If nobody else is doing it, I can translate the FAQ into Sphinx as I'd > like > > to begin gradually extending

RC 2 is now available for testing (Early RC1 testing on a RedHat-based system with dynamic provider gateways uncovered a couple of debilitating defects in the enable/disable logic). Thank you for testing, -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like Washington, USA \ all of the passengers in

RC 2 is now available for testing (Early RC1 testing on a RedHat-based system with dynamic provider gateways uncovered a couple of debilitating defects in the enable/disable logic). Thank you for testing, -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like Washington, USA \ all of the passengers in

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > That reminds me: Do the web documents reside in a repository somewhere or > should I just grab them using wget? The website is at http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/www/trunk/ . The llvm docs are in llvm/docs. Which actually makes me wonder if the LLVM-project FAQ (in reference to Chandler's post in

Hi guys, I understand Rails is licensed under the MIT license, does this allow me to write proprietary applications with Rails? Thanks a lot, Ed -- Encontr? a "Tu psic?pata favorito" http://tuxmaniac.blogspot.com Thou shalt study thy libraries and strive not to reinvent them without cause, that thy code may be short and readable and thy days pleasant and productive. -- Seventh

Dear R-users I would like to integrate something like \int_k^\infty (1 - F(x)) dx, where F(.) is a cumulative distribution function. As mentioned in the "integrate" help-page: integrate(dnorm,0,20000) ## fails on many systems. This does not happen for an adaptive Simpson or Lobatto quadrature (cf. Matlab). Even though I am hardly familiar with numerical integration the implementation

...t restarting libvirtd. It *seems* to me that (wild guess) they can be listed as long as they are fresh and in some in memory cache and never get displayed if you have to enumerate from the filesystem. There are no error-messages that I can see - the volumes are simply not displayed. Best regards, thies Am 23. April 2017 um 15:14:55, Roman Bogorodskiy (bogorodskiy@gmail.com) schrieb: Thies C. Arntzen wrote: > Hi, > > I’m new here so apologies if this has been answered before. > > I have a box that uses ZFS for everything (ubuntu 17.04) and I want to > create a libvirt poo...

...ted via virsh vol-list zpool. The very same thing works as expected if I create a new zfs pool which I hand into libvirt. So instead of creating a pool from "big/zpool“ I create a pool names „somepool“ on a free device and -voila- everything works. Hope I did make myself clear? Best regards, thies

The irony of this reply is killing me :) On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > You're not alone :) Don't let it bug you. > > I finally decided to install a GMail extension that enables reply-all for > all messages, because I kept forgetting. Perhaps you can find such an > extension or simply enable reply-all by default?

If nobody else is doing it, I can translate the FAQ into Sphinx as I'd like to begin gradually extending it so that it some day becomes more than just bare metal. I figure that extending the FAQ is one way to reduce the "noise" on the various mailing lists. Cheers, Mikael -- -- Love Thy Frog! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Email Lists wrote: > -> Once the number three, being the third number, be > -> reached, then lobbest thou thy Holy Chicken of Antioch towards thy > foe, > > Ok... after much chasing around the yard and far too much clucking > baaaagokkkkk racket... I have the chicken!!! > > Still alive I might add. :-) > > Now, where in scripture do I find this again? :-)

Hehe, I intentionally left out the group because I just wanted to cheer you up and let you know that there's more than one "retard" on the list. 2012/6/14 Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> > The irony of this reply is killing me :) > > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org>wrote: > >> You're not alone :)

I have a text file similar to this (separated by spaces): x <- "DF12 This is an example 1 This DF12 This is an 1232 This is DF14 This is 12334 This is an DF15 This 23 This is an example " and I know the field lengths of each variable (there is 5 variables in this data set), which are: varlength <- c(2, 2, 18, 5, 18) How can I import this kind of data into R, using the varlength

btw, the "default reply-to-all" extension for gmail works great! On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > Hehe, I intentionally left out the group because I just wanted to cheer > you up and let you know that there's more than one "retard" on the list. > > > 2012/6/14 Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> >

Hi, Just a brief follow-up on my link time issue: It was caused by excessive trashing; I tried rebuilding on a box with 8 gigs of RAM and observed the memory load while linking clang.exe: It peaked at 5 gigabytes memory, so now I've written this piece of info into the LLVM/Windows document that I posted earlier (I have already made a substantial number of corrections in the document). All in

Hello, I'm new to LLVM and I had a question about it: when we call the JIT::runFunction, since llvm doesn't has a full FFI, there are some cases in which the JIT needs to codegen a stub function to call the function we are interested, my question is: this stub function will remains in the module until when ? What are the most efficient way to remove it from the module and memory ? For a

I'm trying to get a plot with wide lines that don't have rounded end caps. You can see the effect quite clearly with a plot like this: plot(0:1) lines(c(1.5,1.5),c(0,.5),lwd=20,col="red") lines(c(1.5,1.5),c(.5,1),lwd=20,col="green") abline(h=0) abline(h=0.5) abline(h=1) The colored lines should be between the horizontal lines, but because of the rounded end caps,

I appeal to those entrusted with the keeping of the R flame, the S flame, and the S-Plus flame to relate a bit of history. How did S, S-Plus, and R get their names? Going from S to S-Plus appears clear, a commercial company purchased rights to S, developed a product that they wanted to indicate was related to S, but was more fully developed. This leaves me with only a rumor how S got its original

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > If nobody else is doing it, I can translate the FAQ into Sphinx as I'd like > to begin gradually extending it so that it some day becomes more than just > bare metal.  I figure that extending the FAQ is one way to reduce the > "noise" on the various mailing lists. > > > Cheers,