search for: theyed

Hello, I've recently received a Cisco 7960G phone with the factory default SCCP firmware on it. As we're using SIP on our network, the first things i've done was to upgrade but unfortunately the phone just restarted. By looking on the TFTP logs and tcpump output, i've seen that the phone crashed and restarted just after downloading the OS79XX.TXT file, without requesting the image

Hi, On 2018-03-07 16:35, Ondrej Valousek wrote: > Why do you need to replace your existing solution? > If you don't need to scale out due to the capacity reasons, the async > NFS server will always outperform GlusterFS The current solution is 8 years old and is reaching its end of life. The reason we are also looking into gluster is that we like that it uses standard components

Hi Rik, Nice clarity and detail in the description. Thanks! inline... On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 8:29 PM, Rik Theys <Rik.Theys at esat.kuleuven.be> wrote: > Hi, > > We are looking into replacing our current storage solution and are > evaluating gluster for this purpose. Our current solution uses a SAN > with two servers attached that serve samba and NFS 4. Clients connect to

Hello! I want to connect computers with windows xp (pro/home) to a one computer linux (with samba). I want to every user who want to use his/her account data may use any of the computers in the office and have theys personal data (in any pleace in the office) (domain or something, i don't know). I have a little problem with a how to plan and configure all of that and i am thinking if it

Hi, We are looking into replacing our current storage solution and are evaluating gluster for this purpose. Our current solution uses a SAN with two servers attached that serve samba and NFS 4. Clients connect to those servers using NFS or SMB. All users' home directories live on this server. I would like to have some insight in who else is using gluster for home directories for about 500

...following (or is it not possible with asterisk - but possible with ...) I'd like to set up something like a "Mobile to Conventionel Network Gateway" - so that users (with there Mobile Phone) which are registered (known Call Number) can Call a Conventionel Network Number + the Number theyed liked to call (for foreign country calls) - the gateway then connects to the foreign number and let the call start. For example: If you'd like to call a number in the united states with your mobile phone (which normally is expensive) - then you call for example 0732/432563-1272626552 (localnumb...

Hi, As I posted in my previous emails - glusterfs can never match NFS (especially async one) performance of small files/latency. That's given by the design. Nothing you can do about it. Ondrej -----Original Message----- From: gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org [mailto:gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org] On Behalf Of Rik Theys Sent: Monday, March 19, 2018 10:38 AM To: gluster-users at

Hi, I've done some similar tests and experience similar performance issues (see my 'gluster for home directories?' thread on the list). If I read your mail correctly, you are comparing an NFS mount of the brick disk against a gluster mount (using the fuse client)? Which options do you have set on the NFS export (sync or async)? >From my tests, I concluded that the issue was not

On 3/19/2018 5:42 AM, Ondrej Valousek wrote: Removing NFS or NFS Ganesha from the equation, not very impressed on my own setup either. For the writes it's doing, that's alot of CPU usage in top. Seems bottle-necked via a single execution core somewhere trying to facilitate read / writes to the other bricks. Writes to the gluster FS from within one of the gluster participating bricks:

Hi, On 03/19/2018 03:42 PM, TomK wrote: > On 3/19/2018 5:42 AM, Ondrej Valousek wrote: > Removing NFS or NFS Ganesha from the equation, not very impressed on my > own setup either.? For the writes it's doing, that's alot of CPU usage > in top. Seems bottle-necked via a single execution core somewhere trying > to facilitate read / writes to the other bricks. > >

On 3/19/2018 10:52 AM, Rik Theys wrote: > Hi, > > On 03/19/2018 03:42 PM, TomK wrote: >> On 3/19/2018 5:42 AM, Ondrej Valousek wrote: >> Removing NFS or NFS Ganesha from the equation, not very impressed on my >> own setup either.? For the writes it's doing, that's alot of CPU usage >> in top. Seems bottle-necked via a single execution core somewhere trying

Hi, Why do you need to replace your existing solution? If you don't need to scale out due to the capacity reasons, the async NFS server will always outperform GlusterFS Ondrej ----- The information contained in this e-mail and in any attachments is confidential and is designated solely for the attention of the intended recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient, you must not use,

Hello List, I have a longitudinal samples on multiple individuals, for initial analysis, i am doing some plots to see how the variable changes with the age. In some of the individuals one or two data points are missing, IL1Ra Age.at.Sample.Collection Subject.ID 6.575466 2.004106 00709-0 NA 2.162902

Howdy all, We're experiencing terrible small file performance when copying or moving files on gluster clients. In the example below, Gluster is taking 6mins~ to copy 128MB / 21,000 files sideways on a client, doing the same thing on NFS (which I know is a totally different solution etc. etc.) takes approximately 10-15 seconds(!). Any advice for tuning the volume or XFS settings would be

Just would like to draw the maintainers attention to my GUI to samba. Some time ago I spoke with someone on the subject, since the project is very advanced right now this email is just a reminder. Any information on whats worng whats missing and what does not wrong is welcomed. The project is at: http://freshmeat.net/projects/thor Atom

I compared quicktime aac and vorbis,i think quicktime aac is better than vorbis at 80Kbps. please tell me if i'm wrong. using command: qtaacenc.exe --tvbr 31 --highest --samplerate keep test.wav qt.m4a oggenc2.exe --raw -q 1.6 test.wav -o vorbis.ogg the version: qtaacenc version 20100725 with QuickTime 7.6.7 OggEnc v2.87 (libvorbis 1.3.1) links:

On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 1:55 AM, TomK <tomkcpr at mdevsys.com> wrote: > On 3/19/2018 10:52 AM, Rik Theys wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On 03/19/2018 03:42 PM, TomK wrote: >> >>> On 3/19/2018 5:42 AM, Ondrej Valousek wrote: >>> Removing NFS or NFS Ganesha from the equation, not very impressed on my >>> own setup either. For the writes

Hi Nadav, that's the whole point of it. I can't in general make the index calculation simpler. The example given is the simplest non-trivial index function that is needed. It might well be that it's that simple that the index calculation in this case can be thrown aways altogether and - as you say - be replaced by the simple loop you mentioned. However, this cannot be done in the

Hi, Our AD domain "A.COM" has a one-way trust with "B.COM" with B.COM being the trusted domain. We have a samba server that is joined to A.COM on which users of B.COM need access. We have samba and winbind configured and it seems to be working correctly except for the following message that keeps on appearing in the log.wb-B logfile: [2017/05/04 14:42:53.727050, 0]

Hi, When I create an environment object with new.env() and populate it with values then how can I save it into an .RData file properly, so it can be loaded later on in a new session? Saving an environment object with save() or save.image() results in an error message when loading again: Error: protect(): protection stack overflow Regards, benjamin ======================================