search for: theroretically

Has anyone tried this to setup a AD DC and Memberserver on one machine? https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Multiple_Server_Instances Is it possible to provision a domain in one instance to have a DC? Sounds interesting to me.

Since all my Samba AD member servers rely on vfs_acl_xattr to take care of Windows permissions, is there any performance advantage to building samba with a static vfs_acl_xattr module? (./configure --with-static-modules=vfs_acl_xattr) Thank you

> no, it only has a theoretical impact on the number of open > filehandles, theroretical means in that context surely not relevant > for a fileserver > > if you have a preforking service and expect many thousand forkers than > it may become relevant Thank you Would you give the same advice in the case of a Samba 4 AD Domain Controller?

Dear all, Using the quasibinomial and quasipoisson families results in no AIC being calculated. However, a quasi AIC has actually been defined by Lebreton et al (1992). In the (in my opinon, at least) very interesting book by Burnham and Anderson (1998,2002) this QAIC (and also QAICc) is covered. Maybe this is something that could be implemented in R. Take a look at page 23 in this pdf:

Hi Folks: I am continuing to work with samba on FC3 for use as a file server etc. I have set up my server according to the instructions on http://us3.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/FastStart.html#id2535778 Here is my smb.conf file [root@srvfs-01 conf]# cat smb.conf [global] workgroup = MCASCHOOL netbios name = SRVFS-01 server string = MCA File Server

Am 12.03.2016 um 19:48 schrieb Miguel Medalha: > Since all my Samba AD member servers rely on vfs_acl_xattr to take care > of Windows permissions, is there any performance advantage to building > samba with a static vfs_acl_xattr module? > > (./configure --with-static-modules=vfs_acl_xattr) no, it only has a theoretical impact on the number of open filehandles, theroretical means

Am 12.03.2016 um 20:16 schrieb Miguel Medalha: > >> no, it only has a theoretical impact on the number of open >> filehandles, theroretical means in that context surely not relevant >> for a fileserver >> >> if you have a preforking service and expect many thousand forkers than >> it may become relevant > > Would you give the same advice in the case of