search for: therad

First, Something seems to be wrong with the list. I'm not the only person who has expressed seeing their messages either arrive late, or not at all. With that out of the way.. Is anyone aware of any type of failover device for PRI on asterisk? I've found the ISDNGuard, however it is currently not made in the U.S., nor does it run on U.S. power. Is anyone aware of a device that will

Hai Rowland, Im pretty sure this is a bug in the DC part. I'll show. On the DC. dc1:~# getent passwd winadmin NTDOM\winadmin:*:10000:100::/home/users/winadmin:/bin/bash wbinfo --group-info="Domain Users" NTDOM\domain users:x:100: id winadmin uid=10000(NTDOM\winadmin) gid=100(users) groups=100(users),3000004(BAZRTD\group policy creator owners),3000008(NTDOM\domain admins)

Mandi! L.P.H. van Belle via samba In chel di` si favelave... > Im pretty sure this is a bug in the DC part. Ahem, sorry, but i'm lost in following this therad. I've hust setup my test domain, using samba 2:4.5.8+dfsg-2+deb9u1~bpo8+1 (your package, lous) on a debian jessie. Very minimal configuration: root at vdcsv1:~# samba-tool testparm Press enter to see a dump of your service definitions # Global parameters [global] netbios name = VDCSV1...

On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 12:49:26 +0200 Marco Gaiarin via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Mandi! L.P.H. van Belle via samba > In chel di` si favelave... > > > Im pretty sure this is a bug in the DC part. > > Ahem, sorry, but i'm lost in following this therad. I've hust setup my > test domain, using samba 2:4.5.8+dfsg-2+deb9u1~bpo8+1 (your package, > lous) on a debian jessie. > > Very minimal configuration: > > root at vdcsv1:~# samba-tool testparm > Press enter to see a dump of your service definitions > > # Global...

...ty bug in some cases, maybe a difficult bug in some cases, but a bug. report_fatal_error is a bit of a wart, to be sure (but that's more along the lines of the previous LLD design thread - API level error handling V exit(1) from deep in the library*) * I didn't understand the previous LLD therad to include the possibility of crash/assert by design, but exit(1) by design V return error codes up the stack - the latter is what I thought that thread was about. > I complained on the list at some point that "by design" LLVM as a library > requires you to fork and run in a separ...

We do not enable exceptions and longjmp is not safe. Also, if it can segfault for some pathetic input, "it longjmps in most cases" doesn't help people who wants 100% guarantee like you. On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 8:21 PM, James Molloy <james at jamesmolloy.co.uk> wrote: > If it can exit, why can't it longjmp back to a library consumer at least? > > On Mon, 21 Mar