search for: thead

There may be an easy solution, but I just can''t seem to get this to work... I''m using tables for part of my site, as they contain a lot of rows and columns full of financial data, so just working with div''s and dd''s... etc, won''t do. My table structure is pretty simple, as follows: ================= <table id="items"> <tr>

I''m trying to create a dynamic search function to filter the list results using form_remote_tag. I need this to work with a table data output. So it would update the partial template of table rows. I tried wrapping the table rows in a div tag but that wouldn''t update the table properly. Any help on this would be greatly appreciated. Here is my code: <%=

>> define void @f() { >> bb0: >> ret void >> bb1: >> %a = getelementptr inbounds i8* %b, i64 1 >> ret void >> bb2: >> %b = getelementptr inbounds i8* %a, i64 1 >> ret void >> } >> >> Since bb1 dominates bb2 and bb2 dominates bb1, no? > > I think this a great example of how our current definition is

> Maybe. > My view is the ideal is either no-unreachable code, or unreachable blocks > only contain terminators. I am definitely happy with both. What worries me is introducing a special dominance rule for unreachable blocks. >> I don't think that rejecting >> >> %a = getelementptr inbounds i8* %a, i64 1 >> >> but accepting >> >> %a =

> Programmers don't usually write code like this directly, but it is common > for it to happen as a result of the expansion of macros or inline functions. > You would not want to require that a compiler front end *not* produce this. I meant to say that whatever mechanism we use to track dead blocks that may exhibit edge-cases of SSA def-use behavior does *not* need to be clever

> Handling unreachable code is annoying. I agree. However, its important to > characterize how annoying. Most code is not unreachable, and we're > (obviously) fine just bailing on such crazy code paths. So in practice the > common cost is keeping a local set to detect cycles in the graph where we > aren't expecting them. We are essentially always traversing a linked list

On 25 February 2015 at 10:58, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 6:26 AM, Rafael Espíndola > <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Maybe. >> > My view is the ideal is either no-unreachable code, or unreachable >> > blocks >> > only contain terminators. >> >> I am

On 02/25/2015 10:41 AM, Rafael Espíndola wrote: >>> all the zero paths from entry to %a pass by %b. >> >> That is a graph-wise definition, sure. >> So, this is an interesting definition, and maybe this is part of the source >> of the problem. >> >> For SSA, at least GCC requires that both "definition block dominates use >> block"

Hi, I have a table laid out something like this: <table> <thead> <tr> <th>col 1</th> <th>col 2</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody id="tablebody"> <tr> <td>moo</td> <td>moo</td> </tr> <tr> <td>moo</td&...

...placing the code and not so much my HTML. Ideas, solutions appreciated: <h1> Current job openings</h1> <% for position in @positions -%> <div id="itsthetable"> <table summary="MyCompany"> <caption>Current postings</caption> <thead> <tr> <th scope="col">Custom ID</th> <th scope="col">Company</th> <th scope="col">First entered</th> <th scope="col">Started on</th> <th scope="col">Post length</t...

...;sorttable/ It seems straigh forward to use but i cant get it to work. I have included in the head <script src="javascripts/sorttable.js" type="text/javascript"></script> In the View <table class="sortable" id="anyid"> <thead> <th>Numbers</th> <th>Alphabet</th> <th>Dates</th> <th>Currency</th> </thead> <tr> <td>1</td> <td>Z</td> <td>01-01-2006</td> <td>&euro; 5.00&l...

...s library makes no attempt to do so, instead assuming the designer can tell it how to sort by giving it a function for each sortable column that returns a value to be sorted. An example: ----------------- <table id="myTable" class="sortable striped rowsSelectable"> <thead><tr><th>string</th><th>number</th><th>date</th></tr></thead> <tfoot /> <tbody> .......... </tbody> </table> <script type="text/javascript"> document.getElementById(&...

On 24 February 2015 at 02:05, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > Will try to reply to the larger thread again soon, but a quick reply on a > bit of a tangent... > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 8:45 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: >> >> 2. Should unreachable code be allowed to contain nonsense (like >> instructions that depend on

>> all the zero paths from entry to %a pass by %b. > > > That is a graph-wise definition, sure. > So, this is an interesting definition, and maybe this is part of the source > of the problem. > > For SSA, at least GCC requires that both "definition block dominates use > block" (which would be true here), *and* > that "definition appears before use in

...gt;Question <%= @question.seq %></h3></td></tr> <tr><td><%= @question.presentation.textvalue %></td></tr> </table> <table cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0" id="answersTable"> <thead> <tr> <td></td> <td>Check</td> <td></td> <td>Possible Answers</td> </tr> </thead> <tbody id="answersBody"> <% if !@question.id.nil? answ...

...gt;<%= upload_status_tag %></div> <%= end_form_tag %> <div id="message"><%= @message %></div> </div> <table id="resources-list" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" width="100%"> <thead> <tr class="header" style="text-align: left;"> <th>Filename <small>(right-click for link)</small></th> <th>Uploaded By</th> <th>Uploaded At</th> <th>Content Type</th> <th>Fi...

....gov>, "Rafael > Espindola" <rafael_espindola at playstation.sony.com>, "Sanjoy Das" <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com>, "David Majnemer" > <david.majnemer at gmail.com> > Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 10:32:30 PM > Subject: Re: Jump Theading/GVN bug - moving discussion to llvm-dev > > > So, first things first. > > > Handling unreachable code is annoying. I agree. However, its > important to characterize how annoying. Most code is not > unreachable, and we're (obviously) fine just bailing on such c...

I''ve been trying to get a handle on AJAX today and am ready to call "BUG!" I started with the code from Curt''s "AJAX on Rails". It used <ul="my_list"> and <li> and worked fine. Except I need a table instead of a list. So I did the simplest thing that I thought could possibly work. In the view, I changed the :position attribute from

...on: activesupport-1.3.1/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:100:in `const_missing'': uninitialized constant Privable Extracted source (around line #6): 3: <table id="scaffolded" class="<%= @scaffold_class.scaffold_table_class :show %>"> 4: <thead><tr><th>Attribute</th><th>Value</th></tr></thead> 5: <tbody> 6: <% @scaffold_class.scaffold_fields.each do |column| %> 7: <tr> 8: <td><%= column.humanize %></td> 9: <td><%=h scaff...

> >I have a question in regards to the usefulness of hyper-threading. I >enviroment out and when looking at CPU options I save a bit of coin not >going with Hyper-theaded procs does this matter and will it hurt to not >go with it? _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users