search for: tge

The second argumentto generic_file_write_nolock is an iovec, not an actual userbuffer. The current code doesn't even have the slightest chance to work. Maybe it's time to decouple the 2.6 read/write code from the 2.4 code and implement proper vectored operations everywhere? (and kill tge O_DIRECT vs O_APPEN hack, and the broken fallback code, and..)

This is admittedly a longshot, but Can you check whether you experience unusually long run times with LLDB? If there’s something strange about tge binaries we generate, maybe lldb will exhibit some strangeness too and we can more easily profile it. On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 2:48 PM Shoaib Meenai via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I don't know about the issues with running being slow, but using a GDB > index grea...

...I think they are roughly on the > same page in terms of delays. > > -Petr > On 1/9/19 6:17 PM, Zachary Turner via llvm-dev wrote: > > This is admittedly a longshot, but Can you check whether you experience > unusually long run times with LLDB? If there’s something strange about tge > binaries we generate, maybe lldb will exhibit some strangeness too and we > can more easily profile it. > On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 2:48 PM Shoaib Meenai via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> I don't know about the issues with running being slow, but...

...module /vmlinuz-2.6.18-194.8.1.el5xen ro root=/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 xencons=off module /initrd-2.6.18-194.8.1.el5xen.img [root at Dom0 ~]# uname -a Linux Dom0 3 2.6.18-194.8.1.el5xen #1 SMP Thu Jul 1 19:41:05 EDT 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux sniff from the boot messages in tge DomU: XENBUS: Device with no driver: device/vbd/51712 XENBUS: Device with no driver: device/vif/0 XENBUS: Device with no driver: device/ioports/0 XENBUS: Device with no driver: device/ioports/1 XENBUS: Device with no driver: device/ioports/2 XENBUS: Device with no driver: device/ioports/3 XENBUS:...

Hi all I am using a pass trhu router and I need to QoS some clients output by its IP address. The problem is that QoS is due after NATing. Is there some clever way of doing this besides MARKing every packet with some IP hashing in POSTROUTING NAT table? Regards Ethy

Thanks...which version of IPP did u use ? I do not have Makefile file....there is only a .sh script Thanks Giordano ________________________________ Da: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] Per conto di Juan Salas Inviato: luned? 3 ottobre 2005 15.41 A: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Oggetto: RE:

David Jones via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > GDB likes to load all symbols from shared libraries up front. And on > x86_64 your main executable is really just another shared library. Yes, but does gdb reload everything on each execution? Every time I execute "run" I see the same slow behavior. Loading the symbols for small tools like llvm-rc takes

Has anyone got this to work? Under Idle Display Animation, the administrators guide says "For example, a company logo could be displayed".. In the ipmid.cfg file, I enabled 'ind.idleDisplay.enabled' (ie changed it to 1), and under the IP 500 section, I added an entry for the bitmap that I want to display: bitmap.IP_500.66.name ="arf" but from there I'm not sure

...that it cannot extract the corresponding halves from the target specific SELECT_CC node (and it can do it without problems for usual integer-based ISD::SELECT_CC nodes). At this place I got stuck, since I do not see how I can overcome it. Overall, changing the lagalizer to support the expansion of tge MVT::f64 proves to be more complicated as I initially expected. And it also seems to be a bit of overkill. Therefore I was thinking about the special pass after code selection, but before register allocation. After all, I just want to do a transformation on all instructions that read or write from/...

I'm having that problem where I am sometimes using an object that's from a previous workspace when I don't want to be doing that. I was thinking of putting rm(objects=ls()) in my first.R function But, the problem with doing this, is that it doesn't prompt you with "are you sure" and there could be very rare cases where I don't want to delete the workspace ? Is there a

...usual integer-based > ISD::SELECT_CC nodes). At this place I got stuck, since I do not see > how I can overcome it. I don't follow, can you try explaining it and including the relevant code that isn't working for you? > Overall, changing the lagalizer to support the expansion of tge > MVT::f64 proves to be more complicated as I initially expected. And it > also seems to be a bit of overkill. Therefore I was thinking about the > special pass after code selection, but before register allocation. Ok. > After all, I just want to do a transformation on all instruction...

...00 Deferred urender PE 0x7ed90000-7eda6000 Deferred udlfile PE 0x7edb0000-7edbb000 Deferred u32lfile PE 0x7edc0000-7edc9000 Deferred ushadow PE 0x7edd0000-7ee0e000 Deferred upictrl PE 0x7ee10000-7ee18000 Deferred scanres PE 0x7ee20000-7ee2f000 Deferred u32scan PE 0x7ee30000-7ee78000 Deferred tge PE 0x7ee80000-7ef2d000 Deferred ierc PE 0x7ef30000-7ef41000 Deferred webbinfo PE 0x7ef50000-7ef57000 Deferred ulzwlib PE 0x7ef60000-7ef7a000 Deferred ussjpgen2 PE 0x7ef80000-7ef9d000 Deferred pngfio PE 0x7efa0000-7efb5000 Deferred usseng PE 0x7efc0000-7f012000 Deferred ss3base PE 0x7f020000...

Hi, Does anybody knows how to get this work? I have been searching all over and can?t find the way. Using chan_sccp tge phone can log in and has line tone. But the problem is that it is not able to receive nor dial out. Any help would be apprecieted. Thanks Javier --------------------------------- Sell on Yahoo! Auctions - No fees. Bid on great items. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attac...

On Fri, 17 Nov 2006, Roman Levenstein wrote: > I still have some questions about FP emulation for my embedded target. > To recap a bit: > My target only has integer registers and no hardware support for FP. FP > is supported only via emulation. Only f64 is supported. All FP > operations should be implemented to use i32 registers. ok > allocation. But anyway, I have an almost

Hi, I still have some questions about FP emulation for my embedded target. To recap a bit: My target only has integer registers and no hardware support for FP. FP is supported only via emulation. Only f64 is supported. All FP operations should be implemented to use i32 registers. Based on the fruitful discussions on this list I was already able to implement mapping of the FP operations to

...=BVkboW3A5g_5c~5KuB4GD0shrVIi&Q*k^wH z53nM75;XYn^){h3^|gT0%ab=_^0Oq}!*@7z<88Ep4J+%U+m2RM;1df!Yud9~(dFoT z=J;7ZMR2ain;TY;F<*QC>$+kqG_MXU&n<tB^tX-e{&U-#QoYWbPB3LX1dLI2GzEnO zCEi4I@Djkx`&0+&W60BEPE@dSJRp<h=-zYGGAD5OWDfENMRlFWHvf41>Mk3YL{&D$ z;?NPZ#Ku1L^z*$NrrI@tGe!^c+!`uumi#U)>w!v?@RQQe$hJ{V{ToiC-G+Jp$R?7I z?4y8Z(S+f9eLy8bYr^z^URQ0WVuVOii=gV(CvcDztFDRquS%dD6Em}fvIi@M&65G& z4+TypBH3lLa8YvgyAAqe_FuN2Z;62UkRD`fl-`IUkWtZna0~KGQlvA|-C%?B-RLw6 zh*Ay~+mZOptf+CuSVqLKZI>0k$nn4RVG5TSVf|FiHu+wpEFhz*DmFA>q}g!lHh#zD z*<3lQVsi0oS-s{?D`%2}H_A(`YGjBKriG!...

..._gWn#`AgfCC7X6!yUw*nb*igSGO zng=l3HCB0UrS528eag at 6w#9tYpc`P1^LnX%t31ZIa?2NzCm<P05+iP?^qr2UPv8ka z0;)Eu!7f)~4losC4#PJ+#rF^9vpVZ+5|B6j``y6q_FX>t<)d>8roBM#BTszKQ|jfx z%=+6j_yaNP0RXmL$h6>@<E13Be~SA`5sg?#*m}%!V#M~nY~Z6KJr%*2bOqY=r5h($ zA`>pJrPmKa3tlr9NxtfPk!U}wBTd=tnv8$^%ta?ZJGS7RwTgeS>hrQ2qiBMX!*bM7 zsiWBuW>p$a5q&A6duT3{ML+c8TK-x_?613a{aQM|{{m#J_4OIfbSiIb1$hvU%|YD1 zl63uEDyE&&>F_%xTKyNnE%9(Eha%T#;^Ub^JXzV;<hx<=5pRMCdkSTP&O5m}jHMC^ znl_v1q{-D7&Wk+Xdg%+LL at yV__B+hB#=O&y1S}M=qYEgLWoR-F&In4L1((r$=j1Q= zB;|R+Y_`3xSKi(yY=LF$jG-^WZ{sOnCziZ_...