search for: testxx

From the WIki features page, ( http://wiki.dovecot.org/moin.cgi/CoreFeatures ) it's not clear to me if the dovecot-stable release supports multiple authentications mechanisms (like in 1.0-testxx). I need both virtual domains and system users. Can I use the stable release for this? Thanks, --Micha

Hi Timo, Just a quick question: do index files still need removing when upgrading from 1.0-stable (as in the testXX series) or will Dovecot regenerate them automatically? I'm expecting to go with 1.0-stable on Tuesday for my 20,000 users (as that's what I've been testing), but if we see lots of index issues, I may want to upgrade to alpha1 (or later) fairly soon afterwards and it would be annoyi...

...Hat(running Debian rather), but I've run Wine under 2.4.0, 2.4.1 and 2.4.2-pre3 kernels without any trouble. Chris In article <91ev5s$30v1$1@news.itfs.nsk.su>, "Alexey Morozov" <morozov@novosoft.ru> wrote: > Did anyone manage to run recent wine on a RH7 w/ the 2.4.0-testXX > kernel? I tried (both 20001202 and 20001215) and found that certain > problems were introduced since I looked at wine last time > (august-september). That time I ran IE5 w/ reasonable success. Now when > I run it, I get the completely empty menubar w/ IE "e" logo placed on &...

If you notice problems with your imap folders and "Lost transaction logfile" when connecting Dovecot (0.99 / 1.0-testXX) via IMAP, upgrade to Thunderbird 1.02. This should help. -- websafe

Hi, I've been lurking on the list since Spring, planning to replace UW-IMAP with dovecot 1.0 sometime this summer. The recent thread on "1.0" has not given me a good feeling about seeing it before summer's end. So I wonder if I should use dovecot-1.0-test-xx code or dovecot-stable-[date] code (which seems to change every day, how stable is that???). This is confusing,