Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "test67".
Did you mean:
test65
2005 Apr 12
1
test67 ldap_connection
Hello,
I've been trying to figure out what's wrong with authentication
against an ldap pass/user db with test67 as test62 was working fine.
[ The problem is the same as previously described in this list :
- FreeBSD-5.3
- dovecot-1.0-test67
- openldap-2.1.27
--> "ldap(dovetest,127.0.0.1): No password in reply"
--> "NO Temporary authentication failure."
or
--
dovecot: Apr 12 18:...
2005 Apr 08
2
attr_names in test67
Hello,
I'm wondering if the following situation is valid (though I think it
isn't since I still cannot authenticate with ldap pass/userdb on
test67 running on FreeBSD-5.3).
Is it normal that the passdb_ldap_conn->attr_names second element (for
instance) "turns to" "homeDirectory" as the following step by step gdb
run sample shows ? :
--
Breakpoint 1, userdb_ldap_preinit (args=0x80796d0 "/usr/local/dovecot/etc/dov...
2005 Apr 08
2
1.0-test67
http://dovecot.org/test/
Hopefully better release than last one. Fixes several problems test66
had and also some older problems reported in this list.
It also contains a pretty large mbox code cleanup, fixing several
problems (especially related to X-IMAP/X-IMAPbase headers) and making it
a bit faster. Maybe I'll backport it to 1.0-stable too when it looks
like it's stable..
BTW. mbox
2005 Apr 18
1
password_verify in test67 with ldap
Hello Timo,
your patch introducing pass_attr_names and user_attr_names fixed the
problem of the 'shared' attr_names member of [passdb|userdb]_ldap_conn
as I answered in the relative thread.
Now I think there is a problem while comparing user-provided and
ldap-provided passwords causing a false 'password mismatch' situation,
while using PLAIN mechanism with LDAP authentication.
2005 Apr 21
1
1.0-stable update
Just a note, I backported some larger mbox changes from 1.0-test67.
Hopefully works, but if you're going to try it test it well first :)
Should fix some issues related to X-IMAP/X-IMAPbase header handling and
maybe some other mbox related problems as well.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: appl...
2005 Jun 14
2
master/config rewrite
...n
32607 ? S 0:00 dovecot/auth -s 3
Or if I should name the binaries all as dovecot-config, dovecot-log,
etc. One nice thing with the above is that it also shows imap and
imap-login processes while grepping for dovecot.
You can get the tarball from
http://dovecot.org/tmp/dovecot-1.0-test67-mrewrite.tar.gz (it has all
the test73 changes despite the name..)
Example configuration file (with bare minimals) is at
http://dovecot.org/tmp/dovecot.conf
I think I'll create a separate dovecot-master.conf for those
service-blocks in the above config file (after I add include-directive...
2005 Apr 17
1
Dovecot causing hanging on random folders...
...a day.. I'd love to track it down.. I've seen this
on Fedora Core 1 (i386 server) and also on a PPC Linux system running an
older kernel (on a Buffalo Linkstation if you know what that is)..
Below is the current set of dovecot processes running on my FC1 box :
[rickf at srv1 dovecot-1.0-test67]# ps aux | grep dove
root 748 0.0 0.0 3380 720 ? S 11:30 0:00 dovecot-auth
dovecot 749 0.0 0.0 2440 668 ? S 11:30 0:01 imap-login
dovecot 760 0.0 0.0 2788 700 ? S 11:30 0:01 imap-login
root 709 0.0 0.0 2312 688 ? S 11:3...
2005 Apr 15
2
SORT using cached filesystem modtimes
Timo or anyone,
This may be a bug or maybe a design decision. Either way I am curious to
hear comments.
Why do the dovecot-0.99.14 server's .imap.index files contain a cached
copy of each message's date and time as supplied by the filesystem, as
opposed to the date and time found in each message header?
When testing various imap clients (eg. tbird-1.0.2, evolution-2.0,
outlook2003,