search for: terrabyt

...=9961472 (95%) messages=0 (0%) command=/usr/local/bin/quotawarning.py 95 IQuota warning: bytes=7864320 (75%) messages=0 (0%) command=/usr/local/bin/quotawarning.py 75 When I try to use the dict (by moving mails via IMAP or by passing through the lda) I get: Oct 1 10:52:15 inet2 deliver(oli at terrabyte.me): Loading modules from directory: /usr/lib64/dovecot/lda Oct 1 10:52:15 inet2 deliver(oli at terrabyte.me): Module loaded: /usr/lib64/dovecot/lda/lib10_quota_plugin.so Oct 1 10:52:15 inet2 deliver(oli at terrabyte.me): Module loaded: /usr/lib64/dovecot/lda/lib20_expire_plugin.so Oct 1 10:52:...

Hi all, I am just trying to consider my options for storing a large mass of data (tens of terrabytes of files) and one idea is to build a clustered FS of some kind. Has anybody had any experience with that? Any recommendations? Thanks in advance for any and all advice. Boris.

...; >> but using "looses data" might others think it also may fail with imap, >> so be more detailed next time > > > UID number is also data that is saved on the IMAP backend. If that is lost then it's "lost data". > > Sami > Sorry i migrated terrabytes of mail with imapsync and never had a problem, it works as designed, also with maildir rsync did a good job, what never worked as it should was dsync ,cause of bugs ,that may changed now so this is my answer to topic "Best way to move mail from one server to another" after all there...

...f we jump up their storage to say 2Tb, that's going to be $5000 for LTO-3 with magazines. This affords us 3 week rotations rather simply. If we add hard drive storage for backups instead of buying LTO-3 tape drive, how much storage would we want for backing up 2Tb of binary data...surely not 6 Terrabytes? Craig

I just removed a bunch of Personal stuff I should not have. Is there anyway to undelete??? Jerry

...er solution for this problem. Suggestions: first, the doveadm import should never modify the indexes, and second: the open() calls should respect the read-only filesystem and should fall back to "r" flag when using open. The problem goes further when using SIS (which goes beyond multiple terrabytes). The only workaround currently is to export the whole mdbox data to a writeable storage, and parametrize the import command to use that and the mounted SIS data separately for import...which is just problematic, ugly and error prune. Thank you for the continous work on dovecot, I hope you get...

Everyone, I was recently given a Dell raid 386 server that had drives that had gone bad. I replaced the drives with a couple terrabyte sata Seagate drives, and set up the bios for a mirrored raid configuration. I was able to install Centos 5.2 without difficulty, but when it was time to perform the 1st boot it went to grub instead of booting off of one of the mirrored drives. I could not figure out how to boot through grub, so...

Hi, I read in the FAQ that rsync uses ~100 bytes/file of RAM when building the list. I wonder, is there a way to measure how long this process takes (adding one file to the file list)? I would like to synchronize terrabytes of data but I'm afraid the scanning process will take a _very_ long time. Does rsync have some smart caching algorithm up its sleeve so it does not have to perform a total rescan upon the next synchronization? Rgds /PL Per Lanvin +46-708-555384 Inceritus Box 29138 100 52 Stockholm

Hello, I am new to R, can anyone give me an idea of how R handle a large dataset (e.g. couple of Gbytes)? Thanks a lot! Best, Mingjun

Am 04.09.2018 um 18:27 schrieb Sami Ketola: > > >> On 4 Sep 2018, at 18.38, Robert Schetterer <rs at sys4.de> wrote: >> >> Sorry i migrated terrabytes of mail with imapsync and never had a >> problem, it works as designed, also with maildir rsync did a good job, >> what never worked as it should was dsync ,cause of bugs ,that may >> changed now >> > > I would like to very much hear about the problems you had with...

On 9/4/18 12:27 PM, Sami Ketola wrote: > > >> On 4 Sep 2018, at 18.38, Robert Schetterer <rs at sys4.de> wrote: >> >> Sorry i migrated terrabytes of mail with imapsync and never had a >> problem, it works as designed, also with maildir rsync did a good job, >> what never worked as it should was dsync ,cause of bugs ,that may >> changed now >> > > I would like to very much hear about the problems you had with...

...hed, but stage2 is just sitting there.. Any ideas? It sounds like a e2fsck bug, but until I know the filesystem is clean, I don't want to clear the dirty flag and mount it read/write. The "backup/mkfs/restore" isn't quite practical in this case as I don't have another half-terrabyte of storage readily available. (And what's to keep this from happening again, for example, when the mount count limit is reached next time?) - Pizza -- Solomon Peachy pizza@f*cktheusers.org I'm not broke, but I'm badly bent....

Hey FLAC gang - Just thought you'd like to know CD Baby has switched to FLAC for archiving the 40,000 CDs we have in stock. Luckily HD space is down below $1/gig so we got a 6-terabyte RAID-5 box set up for about $7000. Got the FreeBSD boxes churning away night and day, ripping and archiving. I'll do a more formal press release for ya in a couple months as we're further along, but

...r 2018 at 23:20 Robert Schetterer <rs at sys4.de> wrote: >> >> >> Am 04.09.2018 um 18:27 schrieb Sami Ketola: >>> >>> >>>> On 4 Sep 2018, at 18.38, Robert Schetterer <rs at sys4.de> wrote: >>>> >>>> Sorry i migrated terrabytes of mail with imapsync and never had a >>>> problem, it works as designed, also with maildir rsync did a good job, >>>> what never worked as it should was dsync ,cause of bugs ,that may >>>> changed now >>>> >>> >>> I would like to...

Hi all, I have a task on setting up a cluster of 2 servers for providing ftp service. We use RH's Cluster suite. However the cluster setup is lack of shared network storage, so the /var/ftp/pub is mounted on each server. The cluster is set with Master and Slave configuration (when the master is down, slave serves. and when master is up again, slaves gives up the service back to master). We

...;looses data" might others think it also may fail with imap, >>> so be more detailed next time >> >> UID number is also data that is saved on the IMAP backend. If that >> is lost then it's "lost data". >> >> Sami > > Sorry i migrated terrabytes of mail with imapsync and never had a > problem, it works as designed, also with maildir rsync did a good job, > what never worked as it should was dsync ,cause of bugs ,that may > changed now > > so this is my answer to topic > > "Best way to move mail from one server t...

> On 4 Sep 2018, at 18.38, Robert Schetterer <rs at sys4.de> wrote: > > Sorry i migrated terrabytes of mail with imapsync and never had a > problem, it works as designed, also with maildir rsync did a good job, > what never worked as it should was dsync ,cause of bugs ,that may > changed now > I would like to very much hear about the problems you had with dsync as we have successf...

> On 04 September 2018 at 23:20 Robert Schetterer <rs at sys4.de> wrote: > > > Am 04.09.2018 um 18:27 schrieb Sami Ketola: > > > > > >> On 4 Sep 2018, at 18.38, Robert Schetterer <rs at sys4.de> wrote: > >> > >> Sorry i migrated terrabytes of mail with imapsync and never had a > >> problem, it works as designed, also with maildir rsync did a good job, > >> what never worked as it should was dsync ,cause of bugs ,that may > >> changed now > >> > > > > I would like to very much hear ab...

...this problem. > > Suggestions: first, the doveadm import should never modify the indexes, and second: the open() calls should respect the read-only filesystem and should fall back to "r" flag when using open. > The problem goes further when using SIS (which goes beyond multiple terrabytes). > > The only workaround currently is to export the whole mdbox data to a writeable storage, and parametrize the import command to use that and the mounted SIS data separately for import...which is just problematic, ugly and error prune. > > Thank you for the continous work on dove...

...do ./myscript <principal> <port> <source> <host at destination> This works for the purposes of creating a Kerberized connection over which the backup can take place, and will adhere to all user access controls. The downsides are that the tunnel is encrypted and is slow (terrabytes over gigabit ethernet takes a while), and also requires that the principal's posixAccount have a valid homeDirectory and loginShell to establish the ssh tunnel rather than being a non-interactive service account. It would be really good if we could use the rsync + rsyncd approach with a...