search for: terabytes

hi. i'm hitting a wall each time i try to format a 3 terabyte partition. i'm able to create the partition using parted but whenever i try to create a 3 terabyte xfs or jfs or ext3 filesystem, the mounted filesystem created is only 1 terabyte. i tried centos x86 and x86_64 4.0 but i always hit a 1 terabyte limit. please help.

Has anyone experienced a significant degradation in ext3 performance when using it on a Multi-TeraByte RAID? As part of an experimental setup, I hooked up three 300GB drives and made an EXT3 RAID5 out of them, using the entire space one each drive, and started throwing a large number of files in the size-range 3KB to 50 KB. Then, I deleted the raid, and created a new one, but this time, I used

Hi, We have just built a server with a terabyte of storage for a powerquest deploycenter file server, the deploycenter boot disks start Caldera DR-DOS 7.02 for the actual deploycenter software to run under. We run Linux 7.3 with the samba that ships with that version (sorry, I can't remember off hand and don't have access to a linux box right now) The problem I have is that the

I have a quad core server in which I want to run 4 virtual servers. On this server I have a 1/2 terabyte raid 1 I have split between the 4 members that have the OS on it. I have raid 5 10 terabyte internal storage running on a 3ware 9690a card. I want to share this storage between the servers without partitioning it. Is this possible? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment

Hello, I have an Lacie NAS disk attached to an Gigabit network. Since it only exports samba I mounted on one of my gigabit Linux boxes with smbmount //lacie/terabyte /TERABYTE -o defaults,username=genuser,password=genuser Now I need to export that to all my linux boxes not on the Gigabit network using nfs. When I try to mount I get: mount: old:/TERABYTE failed, reason given

On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 5:18 PM Phoenix, Merka <merka.phoenix at hpe.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 4:10 PM Walter H. <Walter.H at mathemainzel.info> wrote: > > > > On 15.02.2019 06:29, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Could you recommend affordable and reliable cloud storage for 50 TB of data? >

Hello, does anybody know what's the maximum file size (terabytes?) when using rsync with options --checksum and / or --inplace? What file sizes have been tested in reality? Are there any experiences using rsync (with --checksum and / or --inplace) for big files with several / dozens or terabytes? Thanks a lot, Heinz-Josef Claes

Hi all. I have recently introduced two 5.5TB XFS filesystems to our storage backend. I export the filesystem via samba 3.0.3 on Fedora core 2. Linux clients that mount the share show only 2TB available. Windows clients show the full capacity. Before I put these filesystems into production I'd like to find out if the reported filesystem size is going to cause a problem. Is SMB actually

Looking for ext2 & ext3 expert. This problem is on a ext3 partition. I have a small file (1395 bytes) that appears HUGE when runing ls -l (70368744179059 bytes). This causes a problem because tar wants to back up all those extra bytes. [root@secure parse]# ls -l HTMLFrameSet.class -rw-rw-r-- 1 root devel 70368744179059 Mar 20 09:05 HTMLFrameSet.class [root@secure parse]# wc

Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 09/16/2015 09:11 AM, Callum Scott wrote: >> It is running a little >> tight on memory and so there have been a couple of events where the >> OOM_killer has been invoked and killed off MySQL, which you would >> expect. > > One thing that should be noted is that regardless of swappiness, > overcommit might be an issue. If a single

>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 4:10 PM Walter H. <Walter.H at mathemainzel.info> wrote: >> > >> > On 15.02.2019 06:29, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote: >> > > Hi, >> > > >> > > Could you recommend affordable and reliable cloud storage for 50 TB of data? >> > whats your budget? >> > >> > and 50 TB = 50

On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 5:55 PM Phoenix, Merka <merka.phoenix at hpe.com> wrote: > > >> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 4:10 PM Walter H. <Walter.H at mathemainzel.info> wrote: > >> > > >> > On 15.02.2019 06:29, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote: > >> > > Hi, > >> > > > >> > > Could you recommend affordable

Hello, Can anyone help me? Does any of you manage to load (boot) Bootitng through CDShell? How can I ensure that diskemu emulates a 1.44MB floppy? Any ideas? Thank you Andreas Gortsilas -----Original Message----- From: David F. [mailto:support at terabyteunlimited.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 9:48 AM To: 'Andreas Gortsilas' Subject: RE: Bootitng and

greetings! it appeared to me that previous upgrades were strained by sheer amount and size of the update as well as the eagerness of the CentOS userbase to get upgraded... this last one, well... it went so smooth that i believe many may have missed it happening so to speak :-) initially having been a large Galacticom aka Worldgroup BBS operator (remember those?) and then an ISP for going on 2

Greetings, I'm seeing some weird issues surrounding the 2 terabyte limit on my 3ware (9590SE, PCI Express model) raid controller. Currently, the raid array is 6 x 500GB disks for a total of around 2.3 terabytes formatted. Looking at the documentation on the 3ware site, the raid card can handle a single partition over 2TB, but it still looks like fdisk fails to create a primary partition over the 2TB limit. I did resort to parted, and it creates a partition over 2TB. And, in fact, I can run mke2fs on thi...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 After upgrading from 3.0.2 to 3.0.3 in a Windows 2000 Native Domain environment, 9x clients can't connect and wbinfo -t doesn't work: bash-2.05a# wbinfo -t checking the trust secret via RPC calls failed error code was NT_STATUS_PIPE_NOT_AVAILABLE (0xc00000ac) Could not check secret Downgrading to 3.0.2 fixes this. I can get log files, but

Hi! Although it may seem so, this is the wrong place to put your question. Please contact the CDShell developer. Luis Correia > -----Original Message----- > From: Andreas Gortsilas mailing list account > [mailto:agorts_mlst at sabo.gr] > Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 7:59 AM > To: 'syslinux at zytor.com' > Subject: [syslinux] RE: Bootitng and CDShell... > >

I'm curious to what people are using for backing up their samba servers. Here's are some specs to consider: - 1TB (yes, that's terabyte) of data - multiple servers backup to one tape drive connected to a server (preferably a linux system) - using an autoloader (in this case, an HP 1/9 LTO system) - need to be able to backup daily changes and/or changes since last full backup

...or each subdirectory? A major drawback of the subdirectory approach is that tuning to find the optimum number of copy processes is almost impossible. Is anyone looking at multithreading rsync to copy many files at once and get more CPU utilization from a multi-CPU machine? We're moving about 10 terabytes a week (and rising) so whatever we use has to keep those GigE pipes full. Thanks, Bret

Hey FLAC gang - Just thought you'd like to know CD Baby has switched to FLAC for archiving the 40,000 CDs we have in stock. Luckily HD space is down below $1/gig so we got a 6-terabyte RAID-5 box set up for about $7000. Got the FreeBSD boxes churning away night and day, ripping and archiving. I'll do a more formal press release for ya in a couple months as we're further along, but