search for: techblog

...-info="domain users" > domain users:x:10513: > > (correct to me) > > # new DM > > # wbinfo --group-info="domain users" > domain users:x:100: > > ("100" is wrong ...) "net cache flush" fixed it (for now) reading : https://techblog.devlat.eu/2017/02/04/gid-of-the-domain-users-resetting-to-100-with-a-samba-ad-dc/

...add uidNumber and gidNumber during creation of new groups and users. > Does 'Domain Users' have a gidNumber attribute containing a number > inside the '21000-200000' range ? That was part of the problem. The 'Domain Users' group has GID 12000 (set by following https://techblog.devlat.eu/2017/02/04/gid-of-the-domain-users-resetting-to-100-with-a-samba-ad-dc/ guide). So I modified client's smb.conf as: [global] netbios name = client1 realm = SAMDOM.EXAMPLE.COM workgroup = SAMDOM security = ADS kerberos method = secrets and keytab winbind trusted domains only =...

...ath = /var/lib/samba/sysvol/i.mp.pl/scripts >         read only = No > [sysvol] >         path = /var/lib/samba/sysvol >         read only = No > > Thx for correct my config. > > > i found this toturial, now i need to change xidNumber to 40000? > > https://techblog.devlat.eu/2017/02/04/gid-of-the-domain-users-resetting-to-100-with-a-samba-ad-dc/ > Well you could do that, but that is a botch, if you want my advice, do not mess with idmap.ldb Rowland Penny : Samba team member

...gt; >> (correct to me) >> >> # new DM >> >> # wbinfo --group-info="domain users" >> domain users:x:100: >> >> ("100" is wrong ...) > > > > "net cache flush" fixed it (for now) > > reading : > https://techblog.devlat.eu/2017/02/04/gid-of-the-domain-users-resetting-to-100-with-a-samba-ad-dc/ > > I think what happened was that samba picked up the winbind cache for the DC and 'net cache flush' emptied the cache, so you shouldn't have any further problems. Rowland

Am 29.08.19 um 18:10 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: >> after that this former DC should become a plain DM file server >> >> Should I rm /var/lib/samba before editing smb.conf and re-joining? > > Just remove the .tdb & .ldb files and any cache files, do not remove the > main directory structure (except for sysvol etc). ok, will try in about 30mins thanks!

Hello All, I had problems with the security server, the server is frequently attacked using bruteforce attacks. Is there an application that can perform automatic blocking when there are failed login to the ports smtp, pop3 port, and others? I am currently using CentOS 5.5 in some servers Thanks in advanced....... -- -- Best regards, David http://blog.pnyet.web.id -------------- next part

Hi, I''m really new to rails, so i programmed some stuff and today i read some things about skinny Controllers, fat models. My Controllers are really fat now. So i''m asking myself how can i shrink my controllers and move the code to the models, especially in fact of REST e.g. in focus on error codes? code example: # POST /tasks # POST /tasks.xml def create @authorized

Mandi! Emmanuel Florac via samba In chel di` si favelave... > > I can fire up bug for the manpage?! > At least it should mention the default of 100 and why you would want > it at 0 instead. the bug is exactly for that, manpage lie! ;-) usershare max shares (G) This parameter specifies the number of user defined shares that are allowed to be created by users

...https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blaster_(computer_worm) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nimda It got so bad that connecting a new Windows box to the internet without either a NAT router or a third-party software firewall would almost guarantee an infection within minutes: http://blog.chron.com/techblog/2008/07/average-time-to-infection-4-minutes/ Then Windows XP SP2 came out, with Microsoft?s first enabled-by-default firewall, and these worms quickly died out. Windows acquired herd immunity to this whole class of attack. Yes, herd immunity. There are still a few pre-SP2 XP boxes out there,...

Hi all, I've been reading and it seems like ad backend has many features that I'd like to use. However, despite browsing many forums and docs, I am still unable to get domain users list using `getent passwd` while using `ad backend`. If I change backend to tdb, then I can get usernames on the clients. Authentication works fine too when using `tdb backend`. I think the only issue is with

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > Security is *always* opposed to convenience. False. OS X by default runs only signed binaries, and if they come from the App Store they run in a sandbox. User gains significant security with this, and are completely unaware of it. There is no inconvenience. What is the inconvenience of encrypting your device