Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5424 matches for "tcp_nodelays".
Did you mean:
tcp_nodelay
1998 Sep 20
0
Unknown socket option TCP_NODELAY
I am trying to get Samba to work on my RedHat 5.0 machine. I got it to the
point where i could see the RedHat server from Windows 95 but could access
the file system. It gave me messages about the server
being busy. Now I can not see the server from windows 95. If I do a
net view \\monster1 I get the following error messag
Error 54: The network is currently busy processing other requests
or is
2003 Oct 26
1
getsockopt TCP_NODELAY: Socket operation on non-socket
We get the warning above whenever we use a ProxyCommand. We _know_ it's
a pipe, so we can't use sockopts on it. So we shouldn't bitch about it.
This breaks all kinds of things which use SSH transparently; including
pine, which really wants the first thing it receives from an IMAP server
to be a valid imap greeting... which $subject is not.
$ ssh -o "proxycommand sh -c '(
2005 Dec 28
2
Use of TCP_CORK instead of TCP_NODELAY
>
> p.s. For an in depth analysis of TCP_CORK read Christiopher Baus' excelent
> article: http://www.baus.net/on-tcp_cork
Thanks for this pointer. I'd been meaning to reply on this thread, but
hadn't got around to it, primarily because I didn't really understand
TCP_CORK (the linux manpage is, as usual, fairly unclear on what
exactly it does). Now I understand!
>
>
2002 Oct 31
1
TCP_NODELAY in Cygwin port
Hello SSH developers,
I am sorry if this is not really a bug, and I am missing something, but I am running into an issue with port forwarding in SSH. I am using 3.4p1 of SSH on both sides.
I am running the ssh daemon on a Slackware Linux 8.0 machine, and the ssh client is running in Cywgin version 1.3.13. The ssh client is creating about 7 port forwards in a mix of local and remote forwarding
2013 Jul 03
5
[Bug 2124] New: TCP_NODELAY not set by sshd for non-interactive non-exec sessions
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2124
Bug ID: 2124
Summary: TCP_NODELAY not set by sshd for non-interactive
non-exec sessions
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: -current
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: trivial
Priority: P5
Component: sshd
2001 Apr 18
0
Failed to set socket option TCP_NODELAY on SOLARI8, using samba 2.2.0
Hello,
I found the folloing message in log.smbd
[2001/04/18 13:00:41, 0] lib/util_sock.c:set_socket_options(165)
Failed to set socket option SO_KEEPALIVE (Error Bad file number)
[2001/04/18 13:00:41, 0] lib/util_sock.c:set_socket_options(165)
Failed to set socket option TCP_NODELAY (Error Socket operation on
non-socket)
so I searched TCP_NODELAY in the INCLUDEFILES:
(/usr/include/sys) >
2005 Dec 28
0
Use of TCP_CORK instead of TCP_NODELAY
Michael,
With regard to your comment below:
> As a streaming server, it's fairly crucial for icecast to send out
> data with as low a delay as possible (many clients don't care, but
> some do). That's why we use TCP_NODELAY - we actually WANT to send out
> data as soon as we can.
Can you explain how some clients depend on a low delay when receiving data
from icecast? How
2003 May 09
2
TCP_NODELAY always set, now?
I know that there was a discussion on this about a year back, and
there is a bug 556 this week that mentions TCP_NODELAY.
However, when I use ssh through a pipe (e.g., to tunnel through an
HTTP proxy using CONNECT) I see:
getsockopt TCP_NODELAY: Socket operation on non-socket
How do I tell which end is generating this (I'm assuming the local
side, which is running through the pipe).
Also,
2005 Dec 25
4
Use of TCP_CORK instead of TCP_NODELAY
We're abusing icecast in a true narrowcasting setup (personalized stream per
mountpoint). The streams itself are created in a piece of proprietory
(spelling?, i'm dutch) software, icecast merely relays them.
However, the intended endpoint is an embedded device. This device has
trouble with tcp/ip packets not matching the max. packet size (MSS or MSS
minus header). After eleborate testing,
2020 Nov 04
2
parallel PSOCK connection latency is greater on Linux?
I'm not sure the user would know ;). This is very system-specific issue just because the Linux network stack behaves so differently from other OSes (for purely historical reasons). That makes it hard to abstract as a "feature" for the R sockets that are supposed to be platform-independent. At least TCP_NODELAY is actually part of POSIX so it is on better footing, and disabling
2023 Mar 24
1
[PATCH 1/1] nbd/server: push pending frames after sending reply
On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 02:41:20PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 11:47:20AM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > qemu-nbd doesn't set TCP_NODELAY on the tcp socket.
Replying to myself, WHY aren't we setting TCP_NODELAY on the socket?
>
> And surprisingly, qemu IS using corking on the client side:
>
2003 May 07
4
[Bug 556] TCP_NODELAY not set completely for port forwarding
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=556
Summary: TCP_NODELAY not set completely for port forwarding
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: -current
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: sshd
AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org
2003 May 10
1
OpenSSH_3.6.1p2 getsockopt TCP_NODELAY bogus message on Solaris 8
I ran into the following problem the first time I used
OpenSSH_3.6.1p2 on Solaris 8 (sparc, 32-bit):
$ ssh kiwi
Enter passphrase for RSA key '/net/sic/export/ford/home/eggert/.ssh/identity':
getsockopt TCP_NODELAY: Socket operation on non-socket
Last login: Sat May 10 14:27:01 2003 from ip-66-80-53-59.d
Sun Microsystems Inc. SunOS 5.8 Generic Patch October 2001
1998 Nov 06
0
TCP_NODELAY problem
smbclient is broken if TCP_NODELAY is enabled.
I am running FreeBSD 2.2.7 Stable.
1. Enable socket options = TCP_NODELAY
2. Run smbclient to access a share on a Win95 box
3. Turn 'recurse' on
4. cd to a directory that contains one directory and no files
5. Do a dir
6. The files which live in the directory below the default directory
will not be seen.
7. Eliminate TCP_NODELAY and they
2002 Jan 31
1
Use of TCP_NODELAY in commercial SSH
In order to test my overlapping request path for sftp on another ssh
server, I downloaded ssh2 version 3.1.0 from ssh.com. Having downloaded
it, I decided to study the use of TCP_NODELAY in that implementation.
Here's what I found:
* Both ssh2 and sshd2 has a NoDelay config option which is false by
default.
* The ssh2 client does not enable or disable NoDelay because of a channel
2020 Nov 02
3
parallel PSOCK connection latency is greater on Linux?
On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 at 02:22, Simon Urbanek <simon.urbanek at r-project.org> wrote:
>
> It looks like R sockets on Linux could do with TCP_NODELAY -- without (status quo):
How many network packets are generated with and without it? If there
are many small writes and thus setting TCP_NODELAY causes many small
packets to be sent, it might make more sense to set TCP_QUICKACK
instead.
2006 Jan 24
4
sftp performance problem, cured by TCP_NODELAY
In certain situations sftp download speed can be much less than that
of scp.
After many days of trying to find the cause finally I found it to be
the tcp nagle algorithm, which if turned off with TCP_NODELAY
eliminates the problem.
Now I see it being discussed back in 2002, but it still unresolved in
openssh-4.2 :(
Simple solution would be to add a NoDelay option to ssh which sftp
would set.
2005 Dec 28
0
Use of TCP_CORK instead of TCP_NODELAY
Hi Henri and others,
Very interesting post about TCP_CORK. I would be very interested in having
it applied in the next version of Icecast.
I'm using Icecast in a somewhat narrowcasting setup with large numbers of
sources (> 100) and between 5 and 50 listeners per source. All streaming is
done at low bitrates (16 - 24 kbit/sec) and listeners use embedded devices
connected by 56k modems. It
2001 Jan 29
0
Failed to set socket option
Hi,
I run a Veritas cluster server with two different samba's 2.0.7 compiled with SUNWspro 4.0 (gcc 2.95 leads to the same results)
on Solaris 7 UltraSPARC 60 server.
One compiled with --prefix=/opt/samba-test the other with --prefix=/opt/samba-eng.
To avoid using 127.0.0.1 or 0.0.0.0 when both smbd's running on the same cluster host I set this in both smbd.conf
2003 Aug 26
2
[Bug 556] TCP_NODELAY not set completely for port forwarding
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=556
------- Additional Comments From markus at openbsd.org 2003-08-27 02:56 -------
sshd already sets nodelay for the connection, but conditionally, and
only for interactive sessions, so this is the well known problem:
why does sshd traditionally set no delay only for interactive sessions.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------