search for: tbyte

apt-get update apt-clone upgrade Any first impressions? -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE

Hallo, linux-btrfs, I''m working with btrfs for some days. btrfs-progs-20101101, kernel 2.6.35.8 (both self compiled). First step: mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdd1 mount /dev/sdd1 /srv/MM for a 2 TByte partition, worked well. Copying about 1,5 TByte data to this partition worked well. Second step: btrfs device add /dev/sdc1 /srv/MM btrfs filesystem balance /srv/MM adds /dev/sdc1 with about 1,5 TByte ("df" tells so), and the system works the second line ("balan...

...ting the virtio-net driver. */ + struct work_struct reset_work; + /* Does the affinity hint is set for virtqueues? */ bool affinity_hint_set; @@ -1721,7 +1726,7 @@ static void virtnet_stats(struct net_device *dev, int i; for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) { - u64 tpackets, tbytes, rpackets, rbytes, rdrops; + u64 tpackets, tbytes, terrors, rpackets, rbytes, rdrops; struct receive_queue *rq = &vi->rq[i]; struct send_queue *sq = &vi->sq[i]; @@ -1729,6 +1734,7 @@ static void virtnet_stats(struct net_device *dev, start = u64_stats_fetch_begin_irq(&amp...

...ting the virtio-net driver. */ + struct work_struct reset_work; + /* Does the affinity hint is set for virtqueues? */ bool affinity_hint_set; @@ -1721,7 +1726,7 @@ static void virtnet_stats(struct net_device *dev, int i; for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) { - u64 tpackets, tbytes, rpackets, rbytes, rdrops; + u64 tpackets, tbytes, terrors, rpackets, rbytes, rdrops; struct receive_queue *rq = &vi->rq[i]; struct send_queue *sq = &vi->sq[i]; @@ -1729,6 +1734,7 @@ static void virtnet_stats(struct net_device *dev, start = u64_stats_fetch_begin_irq(&amp...

...gt; > > static const struct virtnet_stat_desc virtnet_rq_stats_desc[] = { > > @@ -1721,7 +1723,7 @@ static void virtnet_stats(struct net_device *dev, > > int i; > > > > for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) { > > - u64 tpackets, tbytes, rpackets, rbytes, rdrops; > > + u64 tpackets, tbytes, terrors, rpackets, rbytes, rdrops; > > struct receive_queue *rq = &vi->rq[i]; > > struct send_queue *sq = &vi->sq[i]; > > > > @@ -1729,6 +1731,7 @@ static void...

Hi folks, I have to migrate a set of iscsi backstores to a new target via network. To reduce downtime I would like to mirror the active volumes first, next stop the initators, and then do a final incremental sync. The backstores have a size between 256 GByte and 1 TByte each. In toto its about 8 TByte. Of course I have found the --copy-devices patch, but I wonder if this works as expected? Is it worth the effort? Every helpful comment is highly appreciated. Harri

...tats64 *virtnet_stats(struct net_device *dev, + struct rtnl_link_stats64 *tot) +{ + struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev); + int cpu; + unsigned int start; + + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { + struct virtnet_stats __percpu *stats + = per_cpu_ptr(vi->stats, cpu); + u64 tpackets, tbytes, rpackets, rbytes; + + do { + start = u64_stats_fetch_begin(&stats->syncp); + tpackets = stats->tx_packets; + tbytes = stats->tx_bytes; + rpackets = stats->rx_packets; + rbytes = stats->rx_bytes; + } while (u64_stats_fetch_retry(&stats->syncp, start)); + +...

...tats64 *virtnet_stats(struct net_device *dev, + struct rtnl_link_stats64 *tot) +{ + struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev); + int cpu; + unsigned int start; + + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { + struct virtnet_stats __percpu *stats + = per_cpu_ptr(vi->stats, cpu); + u64 tpackets, tbytes, rpackets, rbytes; + + do { + start = u64_stats_fetch_begin(&stats->syncp); + tpackets = stats->tx_packets; + tbytes = stats->tx_bytes; + rpackets = stats->rx_packets; + rbytes = stats->rx_bytes; + } while (u64_stats_fetch_retry(&stats->syncp, start)); + +...

From: Julio Faracco <jcfaracco at gmail.com> Driver virtio_net is not handling error events for TX provided by dev_watchdog. This event is reached when transmission queue is having problems to transmit packets. To enable it, driver should have .ndo_tx_timeout implemented. This serie has two commits: In the past, we implemented a function to recover driver state when this kind of event

From: Julio Faracco <jcfaracco at gmail.com> Driver virtio_net is not handling error events for TX provided by dev_watchdog. This event is reached when transmission queue is having problems to transmit packets. To enable it, driver should have .ndo_tx_timeout implemented. This serie has two commits: In the past, we implemented a function to recover driver state when this kind of event

...event handlers void __stdcall WFAudioPlayer::WaveOutProc(HWAVEOUT hWaveOut,UINT uMsg,DWORD dwInstance,DWORD dwParam1,DWORD dwParam2) { if(uMsg != WOM_DONE) return; WFAudioPlayer* player = reinterpret_cast<WFAudioPlayer*>(dwInstance); if (player) { // get the frame to be played back next. tByte* nextframe = player->GetNextBlockFrame(); /** * No matter the following two lines are commented or not, the voip performances are the same, with echo. */ // make speex AEC buffer it for echo cancellation for recorder if (nextframe) player->GetConverter()->SpeexEchoPlayback(nextframe); }...

...s->tx_packets++; - u64_stats_update_end(&stats->syncp); + u64_stats_update_end(&stats->tx_syncp); tot_sgs += skb_vnet_hdr(skb)->num_sg; dev_kfree_skb_any(skb); @@ -703,12 +704,16 @@ static struct rtnl_link_stats64 *virtnet_stats(struct net_device *dev, u64 tpackets, tbytes, rpackets, rbytes; do { - start = u64_stats_fetch_begin(&stats->syncp); + start = u64_stats_fetch_begin(&stats->tx_syncp); tpackets = stats->tx_packets; tbytes = stats->tx_bytes; + } while (u64_stats_fetch_retry(&stats->tx_syncp, start)); + + do { +...

...s->tx_packets++; - u64_stats_update_end(&stats->syncp); + u64_stats_update_end(&stats->tx_syncp); tot_sgs += skb_vnet_hdr(skb)->num_sg; dev_kfree_skb_any(skb); @@ -703,12 +704,16 @@ static struct rtnl_link_stats64 *virtnet_stats(struct net_device *dev, u64 tpackets, tbytes, rpackets, rbytes; do { - start = u64_stats_fetch_begin(&stats->syncp); + start = u64_stats_fetch_begin(&stats->tx_syncp); tpackets = stats->tx_packets; tbytes = stats->tx_bytes; + } while (u64_stats_fetch_retry(&stats->tx_syncp, start)); + + do { +...

...ting the virtio-net driver. */ + struct work_struct reset_work; + /* Does the affinity hint is set for virtqueues? */ bool affinity_hint_set; @@ -1721,7 +1726,7 @@ static void virtnet_stats(struct net_device *dev, int i; for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) { - u64 tpackets, tbytes, rpackets, rbytes, rdrops; + u64 tpackets, tbytes, terrors, rpackets, rbytes, rdrops; struct receive_queue *rq = &vi->rq[i]; struct send_queue *sq = &vi->sq[i]; @@ -1729,6 +1734,7 @@ static void virtnet_stats(struct net_device *dev, start = u64_stats_fetch_begin_irq(&amp...

...ting the virtio-net driver. */ + struct work_struct reset_work; + /* Does the affinity hint is set for virtqueues? */ bool affinity_hint_set; @@ -1721,7 +1726,7 @@ static void virtnet_stats(struct net_device *dev, int i; for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) { - u64 tpackets, tbytes, rpackets, rbytes, rdrops; + u64 tpackets, tbytes, terrors, rpackets, rbytes, rdrops; struct receive_queue *rq = &vi->rq[i]; struct send_queue *sq = &vi->sq[i]; @@ -1729,6 +1734,7 @@ static void virtnet_stats(struct net_device *dev, start = u64_stats_fetch_begin_irq(&amp...

...struct reset_work; > + > /* Does the affinity hint is set for virtqueues? */ > bool affinity_hint_set; > > @@ -1721,7 +1726,7 @@ static void virtnet_stats(struct net_device *dev, > int i; > > for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) { > - u64 tpackets, tbytes, rpackets, rbytes, rdrops; > + u64 tpackets, tbytes, terrors, rpackets, rbytes, rdrops; > struct receive_queue *rq = &vi->rq[i]; > struct send_queue *sq = &vi->sq[i]; > > @@ -1729,6 +1734,7 @@ static void virtnet_stats(struct net_device *dev, > start =...

Hello, i have to backup (tape library) a mailsystem with about 300.000 Mailboxes on 2 backends. Summary of all mailboxes are 2 TByte. The mailstore is mdbox. Is it save to do a simple filesystem backup (full and incremental) with backupsoftware? What is the prefered strategy to do a backup for desaster recovery (mailsystem crash) and restoring single usermailboxes? Regards, Claus

Hi, I have a weird problem with RSync: On a NAS are about 1,2 TB data. When I plug in a harddisk and make a backup with RSync, "df -h" shows the backup disk filling up to nearly 1,2 TB. But after RSync has finished, there are only 3.7 GB on the backup disk. System: Linux nas 2.6.37-gentoo-r4 #1 SMP Tue May 3 19:54:31 CEST 2011 x86_64 Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU 330 @ 1.60GHz GenuineIntel

Hi, after a flaky 8-drive Linux RAID10 just shredded about 2 TByte worth of my data at home (conveniently just before I could make a backup) I''ve decided to both go full redundancy as well as all zfs at home. A couple questions: is there a way to make WD20EFRX (2 TByte, 4k sectors) and WD200FYPS (4k internally, reported as 512 Bytes?) work well together...

Having > 10 TByte mailstore filesystem-checks takes too much time. At the moment we have four different partitions, but I don't like to set symlinks or LDAP-flags to sort customers and their domains to there individual mount-point. I'd like to work with mdbox:/mail/%d/%n to calculate the path automatical...