search for: tbits

Hi! This little patch turns bitwise.c's mask[] lookup table into a bit-twiddling macro (which avoids the <<32 case without branching). This spares the size of the 132-byte lookup table (and then a bit more, curiously). While I expected this to generally be faster (because it uses a few more instructions in place of a table lookup), it's actually slightly slower than the LUT, in a

...case I > thought > I'd ask here. Search for websockets and html5. eg. http://srchea.com/build-a-real-time-application-using-html5-websockets all the best, Timotheus ---------------------------------------------------------------- Diese Nachricht wurde versandt mit Webmail von www.tbits.net. This message was sent using webmail of www.tbits.net.

Le 19/09/2017 ? 09:48, Sorin Srbu a ?crit?: > I agree however, everytime I want to mess with OC I get to do the php-dance... > Irritating, but I guess that's the deal if you want the stability and > compatibility CentOS is offering. This may be a very far-fetched idea, but here goes. I don't know much about Docker, just fiddled around with it a couple hours in a VM. Since I have

This is O/T apart from the fact that the server is Centos running Apache / Postgresql. I want to develop a real time (ish) dashboard type web page showring extracts of the contents of a table. I would like any changes that occur to be pushed to the web clients rather than have the clients poll the database. Based on the fact that I have not managed to come up with a successful Google search

Hi, Xiantao a comments is below. >+// 0x3000 Entry 12 (size 64 bundles) External Interrupt (4) >+ENTRY(kvm_interrupt) >+ mov r31=pr // prepare to save predicates >+ mov r19=12 >+ mov r29=cr.ipsr >+ ;; >+ tbit.z p6,p7=r29,IA64_PSR_VM_BIT >+ tbit.z p0,p15=r29,IA64_PSR_I_BIT >+ ;; >+(p7) br.sptk kvm_dispatch_interrupt >+ ;; >+ mov

Hi, Xiantao a comments is below. >+// 0x3000 Entry 12 (size 64 bundles) External Interrupt (4) >+ENTRY(kvm_interrupt) >+ mov r31=pr // prepare to save predicates >+ mov r19=12 >+ mov r29=cr.ipsr >+ ;; >+ tbit.z p6,p7=r29,IA64_PSR_VM_BIT >+ tbit.z p0,p15=r29,IA64_PSR_I_BIT >+ ;; >+(p7) br.sptk kvm_dispatch_interrupt >+ ;; >+ mov

Hi. The patch I send before was too large so that it was dropped from the maling list. I'm sending again with smaller size. This patch set is the xen paravirtualization of hand written assenbly code. And I expect that much clean up is necessary before merge. We really need the feed back before starting actual clean up as Eddie already said before. Eddie discussed how to clean up and suggested

Hi. The patch I send before was too large so that it was dropped from the maling list. I'm sending again with smaller size. This patch set is the xen paravirtualization of hand written assenbly code. And I expect that much clean up is necessary before merge. We really need the feed back before starting actual clean up as Eddie already said before. Eddie discussed how to clean up and suggested

Hi. I rewrote the patch according to the comments. I adopted generating in-place code because it looks the quickest way. The point Eddie wanted to discuss is how to generate code and its ABI. i.e. in-place generating v.s. direct jump v.s. indirect function call Indirect function call doesn't make sense because ivt.S is compiled multi times. And it is up to pv instances to choose in-place

Hi. I rewrote the patch according to the comments. I adopted generating in-place code because it looks the quickest way. The point Eddie wanted to discuss is how to generate code and its ABI. i.e. in-place generating v.s. direct jump v.s. indirect function call Indirect function call doesn't make sense because ivt.S is compiled multi times. And it is up to pv instances to choose in-place

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Now all the comments so far have been addressed, but only a few exceptions. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops strategy is appropriate too. Later I'll post the patchset which implements xen domU based on ia64/pv_ops.

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Now all the comments so far have been addressed, but only a few exceptions. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops strategy is appropriate too. Later I'll post the patchset which implements xen domU based on ia64/pv_ops.

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Please review and comments. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops strategy is appropriate too. Later I'll post the patchset which implements xen domU based on ia64/pv_ops. Currently only ia64/xen pv_ops implementation

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Please review and comments. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops strategy is appropriate too. Later I'll post the patchset which implements xen domU based on ia64/pv_ops. Currently only ia64/xen pv_ops implementation

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Changes from take 5 are rebased to Linux 2.6.26-rc3, bug fix ivt.S paravirtualization and multi entry point support. I believe these patches can be applied to the linux ia64 repository. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Changes from take 5 are rebased to Linux 2.6.26-rc3, bug fix ivt.S paravirtualization and multi entry point support. I believe these patches can be applied to the linux ia64 repository. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops

This patchset is for more paravirtualization on ia64/pv_ops. - paravirtualize fsys call (fsys.S) by multi compile - paravirtualize gate page (gate.S) by multi compile - support save/restore For this purpose, the followings needs to be paravirtualized - ar.itc instruction - sched_clock() This is because timer may changed before/after saving/restoring. For convenience the working full

This patchset is for more paravirtualization on ia64/pv_ops. - paravirtualize fsys call (fsys.S) by multi compile - paravirtualize gate page (gate.S) by multi compile - support save/restore For this purpose, the followings needs to be paravirtualized - ar.itc instruction - sched_clock() This is because timer may changed before/after saving/restoring. For convenience the working full

This patchset is for more paravirtualization on ia64/xen domU. - paravirtualize fsys call (fsys.S) by multi compile - paravirtualize gate page (gate.S) by multi compile - support save/restore For this purpose, the followings needs to be paravirtualized - ar.itc instruction - sched_clock() This is because timer may changed before/after saving/restoring. For convenience the working full

This patchset is for more paravirtualization on ia64/xen domU. - paravirtualize fsys call (fsys.S) by multi compile - paravirtualize gate page (gate.S) by multi compile - support save/restore For this purpose, the followings needs to be paravirtualized - ar.itc instruction - sched_clock() This is because timer may changed before/after saving/restoring. For convenience the working full