search for: taso

Do these programs still exist? They don't seem to be part of the samba3x package on RHEL5.

There has been a low continuing level of confusion over the terms "Source NAT" (SNAT) and "Static NAT". To avoid future confusion, all instances of "Static NAT" have been replaced with "One-to-one NAT" on the web site and in the CVS configuration files (Shorewall/ project). The documentation in 1.4.9 will also contain this change. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \

On the firewall, what is the rationale for giving eth1 an IP address that is also assigned eto eth0? (Rather than a private one.) -- Taso Hatzi caesar 17 <<-salad cjbx jc vdwwjar jc xi jc jd salad

Hi, especially John H. T :) I'm yet again plodding through chapter 14 of the Samba-HOWTO-Collection.pdf. Not because I can't make what's in it work for me, I did that long ago, I found out for myself, because a great deal of what's in it is wrong. I just got fed up with trying to get Nagios to work - I gave up, for various reasons and started on the Samba doco. At the risk of

Environment is Samba as a PDC, OpenLDAP backend, with smbldap-tools providing the scripts to manipulate the data. What are the recommended/mandated organizational units (OU=) for user, computer, group info. I'm pretty sure that groups go in ou=Groups, but I am confused about where user and computer data goes. I have seen ou=People, ou=Computers, and ou=Users in various places. Which is it

This is some ramblings on why using proxy ARP (on a host in a DMZ) is a good or bad thing. The good is that a computer X retains a public IP address which makes it easy to connect it directly to the net if the firewall has to be taken down for extended periods. Thus, if computer X is a mail server for example, it can still function in a reduced capacity until the firewall is restored. The bad

The problem scenario I describe was reported previously in the Shorewall lists but its resolution does not seem to have made it into the lists. Scenario: Windows XP client seeking to establish a VPN connection to a Windows 2003 Server located behind a Shorewall firewall (running on Mandrake kernel 2.4.22-37mdk). The connection cannot be made, the client reports error code 721. Discussion:

Are there any scenarios that require traffic from a zone to itself to be blocked? If not, Shorewall should possibly allow it as a matter of course. It seems strange having to explicitly create such a policy & it''s not immediately obvious when it is required. -- Taso Hatzi caesar 17 <<-salad cjbx jc vdwwjar jc xi jc jd salad

Been trying to run this on FC3 pulling stuff off a NT4 PDC - it just segfaults on 3.0.21 & 3.0.21a I'm building the RPMS from the tar ball on the host using the makerpms.sh script Reverted to the 3.0.10 issued by Fedora and no segfault. From what I can see (with strace) it segfaults while reading from the socket connecting the PDC - not the first read, but after quite a few

Samba 3.0.21b with LDAP backend The transfer to the Sanba hosted domain appears to work, ie success message, but I can't log on to a domain account from that workstation, complains about missing machine account or incorrect password. Only NT4 workstations seem to be a problem, Win2k and XP are Ok. NT4 is maximally patched, updated and etc - no registry hacks however. I checked the LDAP

Scenario: a) Samba with an ldap backend. b) The ldap database becomes irretrievably corrupted. c) I roll in a new ldap database from a known good copy. d) Problem is the passwords for the machine accounts are out of date. e) Is it possible to coax Samba & the clients (mostly XP) to resynch their passwords? f) I want to preserve the client computers SIDs & names. g) I really

I have been having a problem with 'net getdomainsid' on a machine that I set up to be a BDC. # net getdomainsid Could not fetch local SID tdbdump shows that there is no machine SID in secrets.db, so I'm thinking that I overlooked the step that creates a machine SID. What creates the machine SID and when? Also, is it the hostname or the netbios name that samba uses as the machine

Is there a trick to being able to access shares via \\domain\dfsroot\.. rather than \\computer\dfsroot\... ? Only the latter works for me - samba 3.0.22

I don''t think this has anything to do with Shorewall but I am not too familiar with iptables stuff yet so I''m not sure. Running Shorewall shorewall-1.4.9 on Mandrake Linux release 9.2 (FiveStar) for i586 Kernel 2.4.22-37mdk. Run "nmap -sP 192.168.x.x/24" (for example), where 192.168.x.x/24 is the LAN. You can do this from a firewall/router, or even from a

--

Hello people. I have used all the simple smb.conf that i found at samba.org. Now i'm using [global] workgroup = LAN netbios name = netbiosname [homes] guest ok = yes read only = no In all cases i get a prompt for login but i cannot login! I'm using local slackware's accounts but nothing. Can you please give me a simple example? Thank you in advanced! ps:Using slackware 10. ps2: Now

I am following Chapter 6 of Samba-3 By Example to set up Samba on a Fedora 3 box. It seems to go Ok until page 144 step 5. # net getlocalsid [2005/05/02 00:22:04, 0] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_search_suffix(1155) smbldap_search_suffix: Problem during the LDAP search: (No such object) SID for domain SIROCCO is: S-1-5-21- etc Running the same command with some debugging: # net -d 2 getlocalsid

Hi, i would like to ask you, if i can get a lower-level representation than the llvm IR.For example, having the following instruction in the llvm IR, call void @llvm.memcpy.i32(i8* %19, i8* getelementptr inbounds ([2 x [2 x [3 x i8]]]* @main.s, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0), i32 12, i32 1) i would like to get something like this (in A-normal form (without nested instructions):%temp = i8*

Tomorrow morning, the following systems will be unavailable while I upgrade the OS on my firewall: a) shorewall.net b) lists.shorewall.net c) cvs.shorewall.net d) rsync.shorewall.net The upgrade will begin around 0700 PST (-0800) and will like take two hours or so. Sorry for the inconvenience. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \

Somehow, hopefully to be determined, I got my Thunderbird/dovecot Fedora Core 3 configuration into a real snit, such that I can no longer access my INBOX. When Thunderbird tries to get the INBOX content (or get new mail) it reports "The current command did not succeed. The mail server responded: Invalid messageset: -2147483648:*." Scouring logs and googling has come up empty. Now