Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "targetattr".
Did you mean:
targetattrs
2010 Dec 06
1
Centos DS and user password change
...All services and workstations work with replica, not with main server.
Now i need some interface for change user's own password by user.
Password change must be on main server.
I try login by user to main server, and i can't change own password.
Added that ACL (via centos-idm-console):
(targetattr = "userPassword")
(version 3.0;
acl "ChangePass";
allow (write)
(userdn = "ldap:///self") and
(dns="*.neyvabank.ru")
;)
No effect.
How i can give rights to users for change passwords?
--
Stanislav
2013 Jan 11
0
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Overhauling Attributes
...like to add something to atttributes.h, attributes.cpp in the
interim until your full scheme is available.
A new attribute called "target" would be added to AttrKind.
And target can take a list of strings.
target("foo", "goo")
For example.
I would add a component targetAttrs to AttrBuilder
Will this meet with resistance if I try and put this back?
Reed
On 01/01/2013 04:07 AM, Bill Wendling wrote:
> On Dec 31, 2012, at 4:37 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote:
>
>> Hi Bill,
>>
>> On 30/12/12 03:21, Bill Wendling wrote:
>>...
2013 Jan 11
1
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Overhauling Attributes
...s.cpp in the
> interim until your full scheme is available.
>
> A new attribute called "target" would be added to AttrKind.
>
> And target can take a list of strings.
>
> target("foo", "goo")
>
> For example.
>
> I would add a component targetAttrs to AttrBuilder
>
> Will this meet with resistance if I try and put this back?
>
> Reed
>
> On 01/01/2013 04:07 AM, Bill Wendling wrote:
>> On Dec 31, 2012, at 4:37 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Bill,
>>>
>>> O...
2013 Jan 01
3
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Overhauling Attributes
On Dec 31, 2012, at 4:37 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> On 30/12/12 03:21, Bill Wendling wrote:
>> Hi Rafael,
>>
>> Sorry, I forgot to respond to this. They can be arbitrary strings that are known only to the specific back-end. It may be beneficial to define them inside of the LangRef document though.
>
> this sounds so much