Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "targetattrs".
Did you mean:
target_attrs
2010 Dec 06
1
Centos DS and user password change
[stas at ds ~]$ cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS release 5.5 (Final)
[stas at ds ~]$ rpm -qa | grep centos-ds
centos-ds-admin-8.1.0-9.el5.centos.1
centos-ds-8.1.0-1.el5.centos.2
centos-ds-base-8.1.0-0.14.el5.centos.2
centos-ds-console-8.1.0-5.el5.centos.2
ds installed for:
1) linux workstations authentication
2) mail (accounts & aliases)
3) samba
4) squid acls
Exists several r/o replicas.
2013 Jan 11
0
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Overhauling Attributes
...like to add something to atttributes.h, attributes.cpp in the
interim until your full scheme is available.
A new attribute called "target" would be added to AttrKind.
And target can take a list of strings.
target("foo", "goo")
For example.
I would add a component targetAttrs to AttrBuilder
Will this meet with resistance if I try and put this back?
Reed
On 01/01/2013 04:07 AM, Bill Wendling wrote:
> On Dec 31, 2012, at 4:37 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote:
>
>> Hi Bill,
>>
>> On 30/12/12 03:21, Bill Wendling wrote:
>>&...
2013 Jan 11
1
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Overhauling Attributes
...s.cpp in the
> interim until your full scheme is available.
>
> A new attribute called "target" would be added to AttrKind.
>
> And target can take a list of strings.
>
> target("foo", "goo")
>
> For example.
>
> I would add a component targetAttrs to AttrBuilder
>
> Will this meet with resistance if I try and put this back?
>
> Reed
>
> On 01/01/2013 04:07 AM, Bill Wendling wrote:
>> On Dec 31, 2012, at 4:37 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Bill,
>>>
>>> On...
2013 Jan 01
3
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Overhauling Attributes
On Dec 31, 2012, at 4:37 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> On 30/12/12 03:21, Bill Wendling wrote:
>> Hi Rafael,
>>
>> Sorry, I forgot to respond to this. They can be arbitrary strings that are known only to the specific back-end. It may be beneficial to define them inside of the LangRef document though.
>
> this sounds so much