search for: target_ssize_t

..., but again, they should definitely be fixed. > > Working cross compilation would be _really_ nice, but looking at the code > there seem to be a lot of "unsigned" variables each of which must be > categorized into unsigned vs size_t vs target_size_t. And int vs ssize_t vs > target_ssize_t might also be an issue... For array size, for example, using uint64_t would always be fine (and would fix the problem above). Care to submit a patch to fix this problem? :) -Chris -- http://nondot.org/sabre/ http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/