Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "target_size_t".
2004 Dec 16
0
[LLVMdev] Re: LLVM & Large memory 64-bit systems
...t;> ONLY took 64-bit indices. :)
>>
>> If you're interested in working on this, I would love to get this fixed.
>> After that, there may be places we incorrectly use unsigned instead of
>> a "target size_t".
>
> Yes, gcc calls the greater of size_t and target_size_t "HOST_WIDE_INT".
Sure.
>> Because we build in cross compiler situations, using
>> size_t isn't safe either: we should really be using the constant folding
>> interfaces where it makes sense. I suspect that the number of problem
>> areas really is small, but...