search for: tarballing

On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:33:17PM +0100, Benjamin Kramer wrote: > > On 11.01.2013, at 21:31, Justin Holewinski <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 11.01.2013, at 07:36, ????????? (Wei-Ren Chen) <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> wrote: > > >

This is not specifically a CentOS question, but I am creating RPMS for CentOS 6 from some CRAN tarballs. I run R2spec -s tarball to create a spec file, and most of the time it works ok, but sometimes (RPostgresSQL, Rcpp for example) the package has test or example programs that start with #!/usr/bin/r with lower case r, and the resulting package then winds up with a dependency on /usr/bin/r,

On 1/11/2013 2:40 PM, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:33:17PM +0100, Benjamin Kramer wrote: >> >> On 11.01.2013, at 21:31, Justin Holewinski >> <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Benjamin Kramer >>> <benny.kra at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On 11.01.2013, at

Hi, Where''s the master repository for downloading open source Xen source tarballs? In the past, I''ve always just gone to the xensource web page, clicked on download, and then followed the "Open Source Xen" link. However, this link seems to no longer be there. I found a Univ of Cambridge download page ( http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/research/srg/netos/xen/downloads.html).

On 26 June 2016 at 13:31, Anton Korobeynikov via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > What you're probably missing is that 3.8.1 is made in release_38 > branch. So, everything is there and already mirrored. > > Source tarballs will be available upon the release. Which are just coming, now that final has been tested successfully. :) They'll be announced in the

On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 26 June 2016 at 13:31, Anton Korobeynikov via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> What you're probably missing is that 3.8.1 is made in release_38 >> branch. So, everything is there and already mirrored. >> >> Source tarballs will be available upon the

On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 02:47:01PM -0600, Pawel Wodnicki wrote: > On 1/11/2013 2:40 PM, Brooks Davis wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:33:17PM +0100, Benjamin Kramer wrote: > >> > >> On 11.01.2013, at 21:31, Justin Holewinski > >> <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Benjamin Kramer

On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 10:30 AM, Jonas Hahnfeld <hahnjo at hahnjo.de> wrote: > On 2018-08-27 09:44, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> Yeah, I see. >> You have an unusual development process seen from my POV. > > > GNOME does the same, to pick one example: > https://wiki.gnome.org/ThreePointTwentynine > Tarballs are due on Monday, official release and announcement

Due to a packaging error, the tarball released on Friday night did not have a version number embedded in it, which results in various strange build errors and other odd behavior. The tarball on the FTP servers has been updated to correct this situation. Sorry for the inconvenience :-)

Pawel, We all understand that you're pretty new to release process, etc., but I think you should understand the implications of your actions. You just created a lot of harm for really huge pile of users - the ones who downloads the tarball via some automated build system and rely on the known good checksum. This includes, but not limited to to the users of FreeBSD, Gentoo, etc. Even worse,

On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Pawel Wodnicki <root at 32bitmicro.com> wrote: > On 1/11/2013 2:40 PM, Brooks Davis wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:33:17PM +0100, Benjamin Kramer wrote: > >> > >> On 11.01.2013, at 21:31, Justin Holewinski > >> <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:26

Am 05.09.2015 um 10:18 schrieb peter dalgaard: > >> On 05 Sep 2015, at 08:28 , Rainer Hurling <rhurlin at gwdg.de> wrote: >> >> Is there any reason that the R-devel tarball at [1] stucks on r69202? >> >> It seems, that newer R-devel versions are now published on >> /pub/misc/cran/src/base-prerelease, for example at >>

Is there any reason that the R-devel tarball at [1] stucks on r69202? It seems, that newer R-devel versions are now published on /pub/misc/cran/src/base-prerelease, for example at http://ftp5.gwdg.de/pub/misc/cran/, but without an R-devel.tar.gz tarball ... Is this intended? Any clarification would be appreciated. Thanks and greetings, Rainer Hurling [1]

Greetings, During the past week, there have been some requests for nightly tarballs to help making testing new Asterisk code easier. There was some debate as to whether they would be useful. The reason that they may not be useful is because you can get equivalent access to new code just by accessing the subversion repository directly. However, for one reason or another, some people would

On 6/5/2015 3:09 AM, Peter wrote: > On 06/04/2015 07:49 AM, Tony Schreiner wrote: >> I run R2spec -s tarball to create a spec file, and most of the time it >> works ok, but sometimes (RPostgresSQL, Rcpp for example) the package has >> test or example programs that start with >> >> #!/usr/bin/r >> >> with lower case r, and the resulting package then

On 12/13/2016 03:34 PM, Phil Wyett wrote: > On Tue, 2016-12-13 at 14:16 -0800, Alice Wonder wrote: >> I'm getting spec files from centos git which is really convenient when >> the related source is easy to find. But some things - e.g. from a spec file >> >> # How to create the source tarball: >> # >> # git clone

Hi,all: I've couple of large tarballs such as www.tar and images.tar. Is it possible to extract a single file or a list of files from a large tarball such as images.tar instead of extracting the entire tarball? How do I extract specific files under Linux / UNIX operating systems? Thanks in advance ~~ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On 1/11/2013 3:59 PM, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 02:47:01PM -0600, Pawel Wodnicki wrote: >> On 1/11/2013 2:40 PM, Brooks Davis wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:33:17PM +0100, Benjamin Kramer >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 11.01.2013, at 21:31, Justin Holewinski >>>> <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Tom, [1] does not list any 3.9.1rc2 pre-release tarballs, can you please upload? Thanks in advance. Regards, - Sedat - [1] http://www.llvm.org/pre-releases/

Yeah, I see. You have an unusual development process seen from my POV. IMHO you can provide the tarballs before the "binaries" are uploaded which means "prebuilt binaries". That could increase the quality of developing when different arch/os maintainers give their OK. But for 7.0.0rc1 I see only prebuilt binaries for... * macOS * FreeBSD10 AMD64 * Windows (32-bit) * Windows