asterisk users - Aug 2005 - Asterisk 1.2.0-beta1 tarball re-released

Due to a packaging error, the tarball released on Friday night did not
have a version number embedded in it, which results in various strange
build errors and other odd behavior.

The tarball on the FTP servers has been updated to correct this
situation. Sorry for the inconvenience :-)

I?ve just downloaded the tarball from ftp.digium.com and it's still not 
showing the version:

sertwo*CLI> show version
Asterisk  built by morey@sertwo on a i686 running Linux on 2005-08-30 
13:46:04 UTC


On Sun, 28 Aug 2005, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> Due to a packaging error, the tarball released on Friday night did not
> have a version number embedded in it, which results in various strange
> build errors and other odd behavior.
>
> The tarball on the FTP servers has been updated to correct this
> situation. Sorry for the inconvenience :-)
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
>
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>

I am havng the same issue even after "rm -r -f
/usr/src/asterisk-1.2.0-beta1" and tar extract and recompile.  (make
clean;make install).  This tarball was downloaded Tuesday afternoon. 
Asterisk appears to be running normally, except show version "Asterisk 
built by root@<FQDN> on a x86_64 running Linux on 2005-08-31 18:20:48
UTC".

OS is 2.6.12-1.1447_FC4smp

Regards.


Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 11:57:52 -0500
From: "B. J. Bomar" <bbomar@fngi.net>
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.2.0-beta1 tarball re-released
To: "'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
Discussion'"
        <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com>
Message-ID: <20050831165021.96C231077E1@ns2.networkiowa.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;        charset="us-ascii"

I could not find a .version file at the top level of the tarball.  Below is
what my include/asterisk/version.h file contains.

/*
 * version.h
 * Automatically generated
 */
#define ASTERISK_VERSION ""
#define ASTERISK_VERSION_NUM 000000


It's not outside of reason to think that I have screwed something up
somewhere.

Thanks for your help, and all you do for asterisk!

B. J.



-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin P. Fleming [mailto:kpfleming@digium.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 8:46
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.2.0-beta1 tarball re-released

B. J. Bomar wrote:
> I am also having the same issue from the ftp tarball.
I've tested the tarball on a bunch of different systems and it worked
properly.

Please post the contents of the include/asterisk/version.h file from
your source tree after the build (and check if there is a .version file
in the top of the source tree).