search for: tapdevic

Hi: Recently I have some study on linux container(lxc), which is a light weight OS level virtualization. With the previous knowledge of tapdisk, I have an assumption that, I may could use the vhd for each container to seperate the storage of all containers, or even in later days, vhd is stored in distributed storage, container could be migrated. Build filesystem on tapdev

--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Backport of the following patch from development: # User Ian Campbell <[hidden email]> # Date 1309968705 -3600 # Node ID e4781aedf817c5ab36f6f3077e44c43c566a2812 # Parent 700d0f03d50aa6619d313c1ff6aea7fd429d28a7 libxl: attempt to cleanup tapdisk processes on disk backend destroy. This patch properly terminates the

Numerous how-tos all over the Internet show how one would set up a tunnel using ssh, e.g.: ssh -f -o Tunnel=ethernet <server_ip> true I was wondering if there's a way to subsequently acquire the names of the local and remote tun/tap interfaces (e.g., using the default "-w any:any") for subsequent automatic tunnel configuration, e.g.: ip link set $TapDev up ip link set

Hi: I''ve been thought this for a while, I want to build 1000 linux containeres in a HVM, and each container owns 1 block device, so there will 1000 tapdev and 1000 tapdisk process. My question is 1. How many devices domU support? 2. How many tapdev device blktap2 support? 3, Would it be a performance issue in this case? 4. Basically, I want

Make blktap support optional. Enable it by default on Linux, disable it on non-Linux. Signed-off-by: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@amd.com> -- ---to satisfy European Law for business letters: Advanced Micro Devices GmbH Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach b. Muenchen Geschaeftsfuehrer: Alberto Bozzo, Andrew Bowd Sitz: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis Muenchen Registergericht Muenchen,

# HG changeset patch # User Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> # Date 1316609964 -3600 # Node ID b43fd821d1aebc8671e684bfc285cda7a6002ff1 # Parent 206afa070919e3fe0b13a03f870ca2da44ab604a libxl: attempt to cleanup tapdisk processes on disk backend destroy. Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> diff -r 206afa070919 -r b43fd821d1ae

We''ve been working on getting XEN 4.1.2 validated for internal use and have run into what appears to be a livelock induced failure in properly freeing a blktap2 device. We ported the blktap2 driver from Dan Stodden''s GIT tree into 3.2.x which is a reasonably straight forward process. We are also running the toolchain with a patch which Ian Campbell posted in order to get xl to

Hi, Although Im dutch too, Ill write this in english. I got a similar problem then the one on the helpforum. Ill paste my setup first server tincd.conf ---- ListenPort = 8089 MyOwnVPNIP = 192.168.100.1/24 #VpnMask = 255.255.255.0 TapDevice = /dev/tap0 Passphrases=/usr/local/etc/tinc/passphrases server tapdev ---- tap0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr FE:FD:C0:A8:6F:01 inet addr:192.168.100.1 Bcast:192.168.100.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 UP BROADCAST RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:...

I''m getting this message (subject line) in daemon.log every time I start or restart xend. I''m not sure if this is related to the fact that I cannot boot up my Windows domU from a VHD file. The Windows domU was working fine with Xen 4.0.0 (with 2.6.32.14 dom0 kernel). When I upgraded to Xen 4.0.1-rc4 (with 2.6.32.16 dom0 kernel), I can no long boot the Windows domU from VHD. The

Changes since v1: - Fix a double-free bug introduced by v1, pointed out by Stefano where internal pointer was being passed back to caller from libxl_create_stubdom() 8<---------------------------------------------------------------------- Currently scratch variables allocated by libxl have the same lifetime as the context. While this is suitable for one off invocations of xl. It is not