search for: takeovers

On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 17:30:37 +0000, Ulrich Sibiller <ulrich.sibiller at atos.net> wrote: > Martin Schwenke schrieb am 15.02.2023 23:23: > > OK, this part looks kind-of good. It would be interesting to know how > > long the entire failover process is taking. > > What exactly would you define as the begin and end of the failover? From "Takeover run

Hi, I have a dataset of 78.903 news articles pertaining to 340 corporate takeovers. Mean 231.3871 [articles per takeover] Std. Dev. 673.6395 I would like to calculate the probability of a certain number of news articles if I had more takeovers available. How likely is it to have X articles if I had Y takeovers? How can I do that? Thank you very much, Michael

On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 2:52 AM Martin Schwenke <martin at meltin.net> wrote: > Hi Bob, > > On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 06:55:31 -0400, Robert Buck <robert.buck at som.com> > wrote: > > > And so we've been rereading the doc on the public addresses file. So it > may > > be we have gravely misunderstood the *public_addresses* file, we never > read > >

Hey I am new to Samba and have a few queries. How can you archieve "Stateful Takeover" for a Samba Session My goal is to get a samba service running over a cluster. For the client it is transparent to witch server he connects. If a node in the cluster dies, the connection will move with all the states over to another node. I know Samba 3 is not clusteraware, perhaps anybody knows

Hi 2 node ctdb 2.5.3 on Ubuntu 14.04 nodes apparmor teardown and firewall and stopped dead The IP takeover is working fine between the nodes: Jul 21 14:12:03 uc1 ctdbd: recoverd:Trigger takeoverrun Jul 21 14:12:03 uc1 ctdbd: recoverd:Takeover run starting Jul 21 14:12:04 uc1 ctdbd: Takeover of IP 192.168.1.81/24 on interface bond0 Jul 21 14:12:04 uc1 ctdbd: Takeover of IP 192.168.1.80/24 on

Very helpful. Thank you, Martin. I'd like to share the information below with you and solicit your fine feedback :-) I provide additional detail in case there is something else you feel strongly we should consider. We made some changes last night, let me share those with you. The error that is repeating itself and causing these failures is: Takeover run starting RELEASE_IP 10.200.1.230

I'm currently hacking on CTDB's IP takeover/failover code. For Samba 4.6, I would like to rationalise the IP takeover-related tunable parameters. I would like to know if there are any users who set the values of these tunables to non-default values. The tunables in question are: DisableIPFailover Default: 0 When set to non-zero, ctdb will not perform failover or

hi all I had a working cluster, very basic, standard. I'm not sure if recent updates broke it. I see these: 2017/01/24 22:20:05.025164 [recoverd: 3474]: Public IP '10.5.10.51' is assigned to us but not on an interface 2017/01/24 22:20:05.027571 [recoverd: 3474]: Trigger takeoverrun 2017/01/24 22:20:05.053386 [recoverd: 3474]: Takeover run starting 2017/01/24 22:20:05.106044 [

Asterisk Project Security Advisory - AST-2017-005 Product Asterisk Summary Media takeover in RTP stack Nature of Advisory Unauthorized data disclosure Susceptibility Remote Unauthenticated Sessions Severity Critical

...kd: server x.x.253.252 OK [Mon Feb 13 12:28:50 2023] lockd: server x.x.253.252 OK (x.x.253.252 is one of 8 IPs that ctdb handles). _Some_ of the clients fail to get the nfs mounts alive again after those messages. We then have to reboot those or use a lazy umount. We are seeing this at almost all takeovers. Because of that we currently cannot update/reboot nodes without affecting many users which to some degree defeats the purpose of ctdb which should provide seamless takeovers... Today I (again) tried to debug these hanging clients and came across this output in the ctdb log: ... Feb 13 12:27:55...

Given all the issues with the fax DSP code and reliability, I'm looking into the option of using an external fax modem instead of trying to shoehorn asterisk into handling faxes properly... I'm thinking of hooking up the faxmodem to the line directly, then hooking the X100P to the modem's Phone port. Can I enable fax detection and use the fax extension to spawn an external command

You should open up dragdrop.js in the scriptaculous directory and take a look at the interface for Draggables/Draggable. There is an event for dragStart, dragging, and dragEnd (not by those exact names but you should see them)... sorry I can''t offer more help than just pointing you in the right direction... very busy. Good luck, nice start! The information transmitted in this

Hi to all, I'm having a CTDB-Cluster with two nodes (both Ubuntu wit Sernet-packages 4.17.4). Now I want to replace one of the nodes. The first step was to bring a new node to the CTDB-Cluster. This time a Debian 11 but with the same sernet-packages (4.17.4). Adding the new node to /etc/ctdb/nodes at the end of the list. And the virtual IP to /etc/ctdb/public_addresses, also at the end

...OK, this part looks kind-of good. It would be interesting to know how long the entire failover process is taking. > _Some_ of the clients fail to get the nfs mounts alive again after > those messages. We then have to reboot those or use a lazy umount. We > are seeing this at almost all takeovers. > Because of that we currently cannot update/reboot nodes without > affecting many users which to some degree defeats the purpose of ctdb > which should provide seamless takeovers... :-( > Today I (again) tried to debug these hanging clients and came across this output in the ctdb...

Hi there, I am looking into using CTDB between a PDC and a BDC. I assume this is possible! However I have a few questions: 1: Do I have to use tdb2 as an Idmap backend? Can I not stay with ldap? (from the CTDB docs: A clustered Samba install must set some specific configuration parameters clustering = yes idmap backend = tdb2 private dir = /a/directory/on/your/cluster/filesystem It is

Hi Bob, On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 06:55:31 -0400, Robert Buck <robert.buck at som.com> wrote: > And so we've been rereading the doc on the public addresses file. So it may > be we have gravely misunderstood the *public_addresses* file, we never read > that part of the documentation carefully. The *nodes* file made perfect > sense, and the point we missed is that CTDB is using

Hello, at this time i want to install a CTDB Cluster with SAMBA 4.7.7 from SOURCE! I compiled samba as follow: |./configure| |--with-cluster-support ||--with-shared-modules=idmap_rid,idmap_tdb2,idmap_ad| The whole SAMBA enviroment is located in /usr/local/samba/. CTDB is located in /usr/local/samba/etc/ctdb. I guess right that the correct path of ctdbd.conf (node file, public address file

Hi. Is anyone using conntrack-tools to implement gateway failover on a network with windows clients? I set it up with ucarp and keepalived, and found that gratuitous ARP doesn''t always seem to update the cache on Windows machines. It works the first time, but if a second failover happens, the client continues to send stuff to the wrong MAC address. Linux machines work fine.

Martin Schwenke schrieb am 15.02.2023 23:23: > Hi Uli, > > [Sorry for slow response, life is busy...] Thanks for answering anyway! > On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 15:06:26 +0000, Ulrich Sibiller via samba > OK, this part looks kind-of good. It would be interesting to know how > long the entire failover process is taking. What exactly would you define as the begin and end of the

Hi Stefan, On Thu, 26 Jan 2023 16:35:59 +0100, Stefan Kania via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I'm having a CTDB-Cluster with two nodes (both Ubuntu wit > Sernet-packages 4.17.4). Now I want to replace one of the nodes. The > first step was to bring a new node to the CTDB-Cluster. This time a > Debian 11 but with the same sernet-packages (4.17.4). Adding the