search for: t79

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "t79".

Did you mean: t7
2019 Dec 09
2
[PATCH] D70246: [InstCombine] remove identity shuffle simplification for mask with undefs
...x i32> <i32 1, i32 1, i32 1, i32 1> %t74 = fmul <4 x float> %t59, %t72 %t75 = fadd <4 x float> %t71, %t74 %t76 = shufflevector <3 x float> %t44, <3 x float> undef, <4 x i32> <i32 2, i32 2, i32 2, i32 2> %t78 = fmul <4 x float> %t63, %t76 %t79 = fadd <4 x float> %t75, %t78 %t80 = shufflevector <4 x float> %t50, <4 x float> undef, <4 x i32> <i32 3, i32 3, i32 3, i32 3> %t82 = fmul <4 x float> %t67, %t80 %t83 = fadd <4 x float> %t79, %t82 ret <4 x float> %t83 } Before D70246, opt -in...
2017 Feb 28
2
rL296252 Made large integer operation codegen significantly worse.
I see we're missing an isel pattern for add producing carry and doing a memory RMW. I'm going to see if adding that helps anything. ~Craig On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 8:47 PM, Nirav Davé via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Yes. I'm seeing that as well. Not clear what's going on. > > In any case it looks to be unrelated to the alias analysis so barring
2016 Jul 30
1
Instruction selection bug for vector store with FixedStack
...;6>, undef:i64 t173: i64,ch = load<LD8[FixedStack6](align=64)> t172, FrameIndex:i64<6>, undef:i64 ... t127: ch = store<ST8[%aPtr.addr74]> t105:1, t109, Constant:i64<0>, undef:i64 t106: v8i64 = add t105, t79 t129: ch = store<ST64[inttoptr (i64 3 to <8 x i64>*)](align=8)(alias.scope=<0x20c8ea0>)(noalias=<0x20c8a80>,<0x20cd700>)> t127, t106, Constant:i64<3>, undef:i64 ... ... Thank you, Alex
2011 Jul 12
4
Possible bug? Can't remove and then put back a file?
This happens to Puppet 2.7.1 (both master and client). I have a file resource that I set to ensure => absent, Puppet removed it correctly with info line that it has a duplicate entry in the filebucket. I then changed the ensure => present, the agent run gave me following error: /usr/bin/puppet:19 err: /Stage[main]/Emb/File[/opt/jetty-distribution-7.4.2.v20110526.tar.gz]/ensure: change from
2008 Jun 30
4
Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure
Hello list. I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without modifications. How did I try it? Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock ) Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee prep-out.log The build failed at the end: Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL Checking