Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "t79".
Did you mean:
t7
2019 Dec 09
2
[PATCH] D70246: [InstCombine] remove identity shuffle simplification for mask with undefs
...x i32>
<i32 1, i32 1, i32 1, i32 1>
%t74 = fmul <4 x float> %t59, %t72
%t75 = fadd <4 x float> %t71, %t74
%t76 = shufflevector <3 x float> %t44, <3 x float> undef, <4 x i32>
<i32 2, i32 2, i32 2, i32 2>
%t78 = fmul <4 x float> %t63, %t76
%t79 = fadd <4 x float> %t75, %t78
%t80 = shufflevector <4 x float> %t50, <4 x float> undef, <4 x i32>
<i32 3, i32 3, i32 3, i32 3>
%t82 = fmul <4 x float> %t67, %t80
%t83 = fadd <4 x float> %t79, %t82
ret <4 x float> %t83
}
Before D70246, opt -in...
2017 Feb 28
2
rL296252 Made large integer operation codegen significantly worse.
I see we're missing an isel pattern for add producing carry and doing a
memory RMW. I'm going to see if adding that helps anything.
~Craig
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 8:47 PM, Nirav Davé via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Yes. I'm seeing that as well. Not clear what's going on.
>
> In any case it looks to be unrelated to the alias analysis so barring
2016 Jul 30
1
Instruction selection bug for vector store with FixedStack
...;6>, undef:i64
t173: i64,ch = load<LD8[FixedStack6](align=64)> t172, FrameIndex:i64<6>,
undef:i64
...
t127: ch = store<ST8[%aPtr.addr74]> t105:1, t109, Constant:i64<0>,
undef:i64
t106: v8i64 = add t105, t79
t129: ch = store<ST64[inttoptr (i64 3 to <8 x
i64>*)](align=8)(alias.scope=<0x20c8ea0>)(noalias=<0x20c8a80>,<0x20cd700>)> t127, t106,
Constant:i64<3>, undef:i64
...
...
Thank you,
Alex
2011 Jul 12
4
Possible bug? Can't remove and then put back a file?
This happens to Puppet 2.7.1 (both master and client). I have a file
resource that I set to ensure => absent, Puppet removed it correctly
with info line that it has a duplicate entry in the filebucket. I then
changed the ensure => present, the agent run gave me following error:
/usr/bin/puppet:19
err: /Stage[main]/Emb/File[/opt/jetty-distribution-7.4.2.v20110526.tar.gz]/ensure:
change from
2008 Jun 30
4
Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure
Hello list.
I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without
modifications.
How did I try it?
Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock )
Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a
rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee
prep-out.log
The build failed at the end:
Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL
Checking