search for: sysvolcheck

...e something similar to this: > > O:LAG:BAD:P(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;BA)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;SO)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;SY)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;AU) > > Try checking using that, but you will have to do it file file etc. > > I personally would set the permissions from Windows and ignore sysvolcheck/reset. Also ensure that Domain Admins does not have a > gidNumber if you are using the RFC2307 attributes. > > Rowland Yes, I get the similar output but it's not what sysvolcheck is expecting. Well I suppose sysvolcheck isn't happy with the permissions, but as GPOs are able...

I just realize that i can't run a "samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck" on my DC's (4.7.6): ldb: unable to open modules directory '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ldb/modules/ldb' - Too many open files ldb: unable to open modules directory '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/samba/ldb' - Too many open files ..... >From memory, it was just fine on samba 4...

On Wed, 20 May 2020 at 14:48, Roy Eastwood via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Yes, I get the similar output but it's not what sysvolcheck is expecting. Well I suppose sysvolcheck isn't happy with the > permissions, but as GPOs are able to be edited, changed and are applied to both computers and users then I assume this can be > ignored. I got the acl settings from Louis' script, but does the WiKi stipulate what...

I get this error when I run samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck ProvisioningError('%s ACL on GPO directory %s %s does not match expected value %s from GPO object' % (acl_type(direct_db_access), path, fsacl_sddl, acl)) There are two GPO directories. One is the Default Domain Controllers Policy and one is the Default Domain Policy It looks like it...

Hi all, We're seeing the following: root at dc3:~# samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck rlimit_max: increasing rlimit_max (1024) to minimum Windows limit (16384) Processing section "[netlogon]" Processing section "[sysvol]" ERROR(<type 'exceptions.TypeError'>): uncaught exception - (61, 'No data available') File "/usr/lib/python2.7/di...

...to work > correctly so there are some differences. Did you know that 'Domain > Admins' is supposed to own dirs in sysvol ? which it cannot if you give > the group a gidNumber. > > I would suggest that the OP corrects the permissions on sysvol from > Windows and never runs sysvolcheck or sysvolreset again. > > Rowland

Hello, I added some files to my central store and now when I run 'samba-tool sysvolcheck'. I get ERROR(<type 'exceptions.TypeError'>): uncaught exception - (2, 'No such file or directory') File "/usr/local/samba/lib/python2.7/site-packages/samba/netcmd/__init__.py", line 175, in _run return self.run(*args, **kwargs) File "/usr/lo...

Hi Andrew and Louis, Found the issue: after rsync-ing the sysvol from our old decommissioned DCs, the sysvolreset/sysvolcheck DO work out. I tried to keep the things simple first, by NOT immediately importing our old sysvol contents, but first check with a default sysvol... I thought that the sysvolreset would just reset whatever is located under samba/sysvol, but I guess that it reads the directories from the databa...

Can anyone explain what is happening when I run / usr / local / samba / bin / samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck it and an error? ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught exception - ProvisioningError: DB ACL on GPO file /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/tdsfs01.net/Policies/{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}/USER/Scripts/scripts.ini O:BAG:DUD:(A;;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;;0x...

Hello, I have problems getting GPOs applied on clients. Running the command samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck I get a file not found error. I have tried to provision the domain in a virtual machine and transfer the sysvol files with rsync But the problem persists. samba version: 4.4.5 how could completely remove the default policy to try to fix the problem? Best regards, Santiago. -- Santiago Lo...

Am 16.06.2017 um 19:17 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Fri, 16 Jun 2017 13:58:20 -0300 > "Carlos A. P. Cunha" <carlos.hollow at gmail.com> wrote: > >> :-| >> >> ls -lnd /opt/samba/var/locks/sysvol >> drwxrwx---+ 3 0 3000000 4096 Jun 16 13:56 /opt/samba/var/locks/sysvol >> >> > > I have this sinking feeling that you have

On Tue, 16 May 2017 15:09:37 -0500 Santiago Londoño Mejía via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello, > > I have problems getting GPOs applied on clients. > Running the command samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck I get a file not > found error. I have tried to provision the domain in a virtual > machine and transfer the sysvol files with rsync But the problem > persists. samba version: 4.4.5 > > how could completely remove the default policy to try to fix the > problem? > Have you tr...

...2017-June/121215.html I haven't received a reply yet. I do not write 'C' code, so I have no idea how to fix this, so, until this gets fixed (if my understanding of the code is correct, of course) and I (or somebody else) fixes the python code, I cannot recommend running sysvolreset or sysvolcheck. This is my understanding of the problem, I may be wrong, but I don't think I am. Rowland

...to 4.12.x as > I did it by demoting, then removing samba and re-installing the new version then re-joined. Anyhow, I tried to set the ACLs using > a Windows member client on the sysvol share of the PDC FSMO role owner to what I thought they should be but when I run the > samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck command I get: > > root at tiger-db:~# samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck > ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught exception - ProvisioningError: DB ACL on sysvol directory > /var/lib/samba/sysvol/microlynx.org > O:LAG:BAD:AI(A;OICIID;0x001f01ff;;;BA)(A;...

In samba-tool, sysvolreset has options for either --use-ntvfs or --use-s3fs to set the permissions appropriately However, sysvolcheck does not have the same capability, and always attempts to verify in s3 vfs. Is this a known limitation in Samba 4.0.0 ?

...the DC the *only* dns server in the Samba > > domain ? > > > > Rowland > > > > > Yes, absolutely. > > On another topic, you saw my thread on sysvolreset. It's driving me > nuts. Everytime I run sysvolreset (which takes ages), and subsequently > run sysvolcheck, the error message names a different folder than the > sysvolcheck before. What's up with that? Is that normal? How often am I > supposed to run sysvolreset to make it work? Mind you, I only have 8 > policies, no scripts or other files, and it's the only DC. And the DB > check c...

> You could try using a script Louis wrote, see here: > https://github.com/thctlo/samba4/blob/master/samba-check-set-sysvol.sh > > The 'idmap config' lines are nothing to worry about, you cannot set them on a DC, but, for some reason, testparm etc warns about > them. > > Rowland > Sorry, I should have said - I ran louis' script and set the acl's according

Hi! Since samba4 rc1 (we update it since beta1) the "./samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck" command returns the following : ERROR(<type 'exceptions.TypeError'>): uncaught exception - (61, 'No data available') File "/usr/local/samba/lib/python2.7/site-packages/samba/netcmd/__init__.py", line 168, in _run return self.run(*args, **kwargs)...

On my small, one DC AD setup, where I just followed the wiki and did not (!) make any other changes except for working on the AD through the RSAT, I ran samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck and got the following output: --------------------snip-------------------- ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught exception - ProvisioningError: DB ACL on GPO directory /var/lib/samba/sysvol/samdom.com/Policies/{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}/MACHINE/Sc...

On Fri, 25 May 2018 15:07:57 +0100 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > running "samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck" doesn't fix this. > > Well it wouldn't, they are both borked. > > Just do administration from Windows OK, maybe this is something which should be mentioned in the wiki. The reason I got to this was that I wanted to try sysvol replication. The wiki mentions at https...