search for: systemis

Hi all, I thought this may be useful information for the Brits reading this list: I installed a * box (one ZapHFC BRI) for a customer last week and noticed the following warning every fifty seconds: == Primary D-Channel on span 1 down Dec 6 17:31:19 WARNING[213005]: chan_zap.c:1989 pri_find_dchan: No D-channels available! Using Primary on channel anyway 3! == Primary D-Channel on span 1

SNIP > > I've got a Samba server running with an Open LDAP backend in Centos > 5.5, I > could not login with the Administrator's account in window xp clients, > > When im login the error is come: "A device attached to the system is > not > functioning" The only time I've seen that Windows error is during machine joins. It is due to nssldap

I can start Rainbow 6 Vegas, but after a few minutes of playing it crashes. I have tried it with and without winetricks d3dx9. I am on a macbook pro (NVidia 9600GT, 4gb Ram, 2.66 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo). The OS is 10.6.4 (with the graphic update). I have tried both x11 and xquartz. The terminal spits out this while the game is running: http://pastebin.com/NCiEh5Q1 Thanks

Uwaga / Attention: samba@samba.org W wiadomosci ktora wyslales/as zostal znaleziony virus. Ten program antywirusowy przechwycil i zatrzymal cala wiadomosc zanim dotarla do odbiorcy. A virus was found in an Email message you sent. This Email scanner intercepted it and stopped the entire message reaching it's destination. virus zostal zidentyfikowany jako: The virus was reported to be:

Hello, guys, I am trying to get rshaper 2.01 to work on our Redhat 6.2 servers, but it does not seem to be able to control the bandwidth usage, here are the details, 1. Our production servers are all Redhat 6.2 with Kernel 2.2.19-6.2.12, the software we use are customized specifically for RH6.2, so I can''t upgrade to 2.4 kernel. 2. On my test server with the same RH6.2 and kernel (it has

Since good server designs have come up in the past, I wanted to point out a "low-cost" server option that has good I/O, and the vendor offers _your_choice_ of not only Fedora Core or Red Hat Enterprise Linux, but _also_ CentOS _shipped_ with it! IN-A-NUTSHELL ... Starting at just over $750, you can get a single Socket-939 Opteron 1xx (dual-core is an option) system with up to 4GiB of

OpenPGP Public Key Server For questions or comments regarding this key server site, contact PGP Key Server Administrator <pks@gpg.cz> Current version: 0.9.4+patch2+JHpatch2 NOTE! This service is provided to facilitate public-key cryptography for demonstration and educational purposes. It is the responsibility of users of public-key cryptography to ensure that their activities conform to

OpenPGP Public Key Server For questions or comments regarding this key server site, contact PGP Key Server Administrator <pks@gpg.cz> Current version: 0.9.4+patch2+JHpatch2 NOTE! This service is provided to facilitate public-key cryptography for demonstration and educational purposes. It is the responsibility of users of public-key cryptography to ensure that their activities conform to

OpenPGP Public Key Server For questions or comments regarding this key server site, contact PGP Key Server Administrator <pks@gpg.cz> Current version: 0.9.4+patch2+JHpatch2 NOTE! This service is provided to facilitate public-key cryptography for demonstration and educational purposes. It is the responsibility of users of public-key cryptography to ensure that their activities conform to

OpenPGP Public Key Server For questions or comments regarding this key server site, contact PGP Key Server Administrator <pks@gpg.cz> Current version: 0.9.4+patch2+JHpatch2 NOTE! This service is provided to facilitate public-key cryptography for demonstration and educational purposes. It is the responsibility of users of public-key cryptography to ensure that their activities conform to

I have a very high level comment, and you may be able to directly shed light on it before I dig into a lot more detail. Why not simply standardize on CMake? It's not my favorite tool, but it seems to work well, we have established usage of it, and several people involved in the project who understand how it works. It doesn't seem like a significantly more burdensome dependency than Python

Hi all, As you might have inferred, I'm in the process of working on some changes to the way LLVM builds. I have outlined a rough proposal below, unless there are any major objections I will probably start committing stuff next week. This message may be verbose, if you want the executive summary, skip to 'What This Means For Jane "LLVM Developer" Doe' at the bottom.

+1 We build our OpenCL SDK (for windows and Linux) using CMake. We’ve integrated LLVM’s Cmake hierarchy into our own (customizing LLVM external parameters like build and install directories, added passes, etc) Migrating LLVM’s build system from CMake to something else would require us to change the way we currently do things. From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at

On Oct 27, 2011, at 6:34 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > I have a very high level comment, and you may be able to directly shed light on it before I dig into a lot more detail. > > Why not simply standardize on CMake? It's not my favorite tool, but it seems to work well, we have established usage of it, and several people involved in the project who understand how it works. It

Daniel, I'm just a 42 year old former NeXT and Apple Dev who back in Mechanical Engineering is excited about OpenCL/OpenGL and all that is with LLVM/Clang, but I've got to say that even though my plans include learning Python for various areas of development the last I want to deal with is a Build system needing it to compile a Compiler Suite. Autotools is a bag of hurt, always has