search for: synoptics

Hello all: I wrote a function: my.bastimeToSynoptic <- function(x) { f<-unlist(strsplit(as.character(x), " ")) hr<-unlist(strsplit(f[2], ":")) if(as.numeric(hr[1])<6) { synoptic<-"00" } else { synoptic<-as.integer(as.numeric(hr[1])/6)*6 } tdate<-paste(c(f[1],"

I am pretty sure Synoptic/INBOX/Archives will not be same as INBOX/Archives. a SELECT Synoptic/INBOX/Archives a NO Mailbox doesn't exist: Synoptic/INBOX/Archives (0.001 + 0.000 secs). a SELECT INBOX/Archives * FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft) * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft \*)] Flags permitted. * 45 EXISTS So as you can see, specifying

Hi, did you have time to investigate about 'Panic: file unichar.c' bug ? Because I have the same problem with a 2.3.0 installation without virtual plugin. Thanks, Marco On 2018-01-03 16:52, Aki Tuomi wrote: > This is not a bug in virtual plugin, but in some email which contains invalid unicode sequence somehow. Can you send me a core file? This should not have occured ofc but

Hi! Was looking at your config and I am puzzled why you are adding ? mailbox INBOX/Archives { ??? auto = no ??? special_use = \Archive ? } under namespace 'Synoptic'? Do you actually have a virtual folder config for all those folders? You can't just "move" folders into a namespace by declaring them there, those become Synoptic/INBOX/Archives, and require a dovecot-virtual

Hi there! I compiled dovecot 2.3 from git. Because there is already a bug in virtual-plugin, and i hoped, it get fixed... but it doesn't. So this is the error-message from the log J?n 03 16:27:08 aldebaran dovecot[26460]: indexer-worker(jakob)<26476><qQ6g1+BhIJvAqAAO:sjYhMTH2TFpsZwAAk1Mx3g>: Panic: file unichar.c: line 160 (uni_ucs4_to_utf8_c): assertion failed:

This is not a bug in virtual plugin, but in some email which contains invalid unicode sequence somehow. Can you send me a core file? This should not have occured ofc but would be nice to know how it ended up here. Aki > On January 3, 2018 at 5:35 PM Jakobus Sch?rz <wertstoffe at nurfuerspam.de> wrote: > > > Hi there! > > I compiled dovecot 2.3 from git. Because there

Hi there! I recognized that dovecot ignores users sieve-script. The global and the post-sieve-scripts are working, but users sievescript is ignored. You can see the sieve trace-files last lines ? 65:?? finishing match with result: not matched ? 65: jump if result is true ? 65:?? not jumping ? 65: jumping to line 67 ? 67: jumping to line 77 ????? ## Finished executing script 'global' ? ?

Op 7-11-2019 om 13:30 schreef Jakobus Sch?rz via dovecot: > Hi there! > > I recognized that dovecot ignores users sieve-script. The global and the > post-sieve-scripts are working, but users sievescript is ignored. > > You can see the sieve trace-files last lines > > ? 65:?? finishing match with result: not matched > ? 65: jump if result is true > ? 65:?? not

Hi! I have some troubles with the virtual plugin. I run a self-compiled dovecot 2.2.33.2 from debian testing. I patched this version with the QRESYNC-Patch from a few weeks ago. But i always get an errormessage, when i try to open an email from a virtual mailbox. So i cloned the actual git-Repo and compiled dovecot and pigonehole-sieve. The problem with the virtual plugin seems gone away. But

Ok! So the subject for this bug is correct... Do you need some configs and deeper descriptions from me? I have two namespaces with virtual mailboxes: The first "Real" is normally hidden. It's not hidden now for debug-purpose. namespace Real { hidden = no ignore_on_failure = yes list = children location = virtual:/var/mail/real:INDEX=/var/lib/dovecot/db/indexes/real/%u

This is a different bug, and I suspect it might be caused by virtual plugin. We'll look into it. Aki On 04.01.2018 23:41, Jakob Sch?rz wrote: > Hi! > > This is very strange... > This error affects only one mailaccount, and it happend not yesterday. > The file > > /var/lib/dovecot/db/indexes/Maildir/jakob/INBOX/dovecot.index > > which hat "Panic: Leaked view

On 12.12.2017 02:59, Jakob Sch?rz wrote: > Hi! > > I have some troubles with the virtual plugin. I run a self-compiled > dovecot 2.2.33.2 from debian testing. I patched this version with the > QRESYNC-Patch from a few weeks ago. > But i always get an errormessage, when i try to open an email from a > virtual mailbox. > > So i cloned the actual git-Repo and compiled

So the core file is not very useful... can you, instead, attach your doveconf -n and your virtual folder configurations and also gdb /usr/lib/dovecot/imap /path/to/core bt full Aki > On 25 July 2018 at 09:55 Jakobus Sch?rz <jakobus.schuerz at ebcont.com> wrote: > > > Hi Aki! > > This is debian buster, but a self-compiled dovecot from git! > >

Hi There! I can not find anything about this message: dovecot[23202]: lmtp(jakob): Debug: Mailbox <lmtp DATA>: Opened mail UID=1 because: header Message-ID (Cache file is unusable) dovecot[23202]: lmtp(jakob): Debug: Mailbox <lmtp DATA>: Opened mail UID=1 because: virtual size (Cache file is unusable) And the next is: dovecot[23202]: lmtp(jakob): rphlK01SG1qiWgAAk1Mx3g: sieve:

So some of you may be aware that Tim Sharpe from GitHub wrote a Puppet linting tool: $ gem install puppet-lint $ puppet-lint mymanifest.pp Source: https://github.com/rodjek/puppet-lint The linting tool checks Puppet code for "best practice" based on the Puppet Labs Style Guide: http://docs.puppetlabs.com/guides/style_guide.html A lot of us have been using puppet-lint (and puppet

Hi Aki! The config is in the attachment. The output from gdb is this: # gdb /usr/lib/dovecot/imap /var/core/24491 GNU gdb (Debian 8.1-3) 8.1 Copyright (C) 2018 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html> This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by

Am 07.12.18 um 08:10 schrieb Noel Butler: > > On 07/12/2018 16:44, Aki Tuomi wrote: > >> >> On 6.12.2018 6.54, Noel Butler wrote: >>> >>> On 06/12/2018 07:29, Jakobus Sch?rz wrote: >>> >>> ?that all and every Flag is set, except \Seen... I tried to >>> figure out, whats happening here... >>> >>> Paste what

Hi all, For people who are looking for some objective numbers to help recommend Samba to their employers (I know there are some of you on this list :-) you might want to look at the following couple of articles. The first one is in Smart Reseller (a USA trade press magazine) at : http://www.zdnet.com/sr/stories/issue/0,4537,2196106,00.html titled : "The Best Windows File Server: