search for: sync_browse_list

...I'm confused with those whole samba/security thing. I'm running the latest SAMBA without encryption and the default share security. As a result, I can't get my NT PDC to sync browse lists with my samba server, which is on a different subnet. I get the following error in log.nmb: sync_browse_lists: NT-SERVER0 rejected the browse sync sessionsetup Is there a way to get around this without using smbpasswd. I'd rather use the PDC to auth clients. I tried setting security=server and password server = NT-SERVER0 but I got the same rejected message. NT-SERVER0 is being rejected but what a...

...wse lists. Using remote sync and friends the servers try and sync but invariably each time one does the other end rejects the `browse sync sessionsetup' i.e. sync_with_lmb: Initiating sync with local master browser BOX1<0x20> at IP 192.168.1.2 for workgroup WORKGROUP 04/06/1998 21:44:53: sync_browse_lists: Sync browse lists with server BOX1<20> a t IP 192.168.1.2 for workgroup WORKGROUP Connecting to 192.168.1.2 at port 139 sync_browse_lists: BOX1 rejected the browse sync sessionsetup Can someone tell me what this might be and how I can avoid it. I've followed BROWSING.txt to the letter...

...only Win 95 clients on a subnet, browse sync works - but not if there are Win NT 4.0 SP3 machines on that subnet. Error from nmdb (at log level 3): sync_with_lmb: Initiating sync with local master browser MAILHEIDELBERG<0x20> at IP <deleted> for workgroup DIGIBILD 04/08/1998 14:51:48: sync_browse_lists: Sync browse lists with server MAILHEIDELBERG<20> at IP <deleted> for workgroup DIGIBILD Connecting to <deleted> at port 139 sync_browse_lists: MAILHEIDELBERG rejected the browse sync sessionsetup I found the following in the archives: -----------------------------------------...

...elease name MY.WORKGROUP.NAME<00> from IP xxx.xxx.xxx.74 on subnet xxx.xxx.xxx.2 being rejected as it is one of our names. process_name_release_request: Attempt to release name MY.WORKGROUP.NAME<1e> from IP xxx.xxx.xxx.74 on subnet xxx.xxx.xxx.2 being rejected as it is one of our names. sync_browse_lists: yyy.yyy.yyy.2 rejected the browse sync sessionsetup process_node_status_request: status request for name *<00> from IP 204.30.73.175 on subnet REMOTE_BROADCAST_SUBNET - name not found. process_node_status_request: status request for name *<00> from IP 204.30.73.175 on subnet REMOTE_BR...

...her Samba server> Now, the log files say that Samba is swapping browse lists with the other server, but it's just not happening. From the nmbd log file: sync_with_lmb: Initiating sync with local master browser ORBIT<0x20> at IP 142.5 5.200.99 for workgroup DUDE 05/06/1998 11:12:11: sync_browse_lists: Sync browse lists with server ORBIT<20> at IP 142.55.200.99 for workgroup DUDE I've also tried using "remote announce" and it still doesn't work. However, on each client, the Network Neighborhood sees the two differnet workgroups. When I try to view what's in the o...

...lks, I'm confused with those whole samba/security thing. I'm running the latest SAMBA without encryption and default share security. As a result, I can't get my NT PDC to sync browse lists with my samba server, which is on a different subnet. I get the following error in log.nmb: sync_browse_lists: NT-SERVER0 rejected the browse sync sessionsetup My goal is to force those who want to access their unix home to use their unix password. All other samba auth should use the PDC. Since I don't know if I can have the best of both worlds, I just went with the default security. Any help that...

Hi, I'm running Samba 1.9.18p4 on one subnet, and have Wincenter (Windows NT 3.51) server as the PDC. The servers from the remote subnet do not show up in the browse list of the PDC and the following message appears in the log.nmb file: sync_browse_lists: RAINIER rejected the browse sync sessionsetup RAINIER is the name of the PDC. Rob -- Rob Nielsen rob@adc.com ADC Telecommunications, Inc. (612) 403-8706 Unite for Java! PO Box 1101, MS 534 http://www.javalobby.org Minneapolis, MN 55440-...

...= Yes local master = yes os level = 66 domain master = no preferred master = yes wins server = 192.168.0.2 wins proxy = yes #============================ Share Definitions ============================== ; No shares! But the one domain works fine: [2008/03/29 17:28:38, 2] nmbd/nmbd_synclists.c:sync_browse_lists(176) Initiating browse sync for WINDOWS to DENMANTIRE(192.168.0.2) [2008/03/29 17:28:40, 2] nmbd/nmbd_synclists.c:complete_sync(290) sync with DENMANTIRE(192.168.0.2) for workgroup WINDOWS completed (31 records) while the other gives me this: [2008/03/29 17:28:06, 0] nmbd/nmbd_browsesync.c:d...

...es, but I'm frustrated enough don't really care.) [2002/08/20 00:57:15, 2] nmbd/nmbd_browsesync.c:sync_with_lmb(69) sync_with_lmb: Initiating sync with local master browser NURS-STH122-07<0x20> at IP 164.113.51.194 for workgroup LABS [2002/08/20 00:57:15, 2] nmbd/nmbd_synclists.c:sync_browse_lists(168) Initiating browse sync for LABS to NURS-STH122-07(164.113.51.194) [2002/08/20 00:57:15, 2] nmbd/nmbd_synclists.c:complete_sync(283) sync with NURS-STH122-07(164.113.51.194) for workgroup LABS completed (0 records) This makes no since to me. In this case NURS-STH122-07 is the local maste...

...967) failed tcon_X with NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED log.nmbd: [2009/05/07 09:59:41, 2] nmbd/nmbd_browsesync.c:sync_with_lmb(60) sync_with_lmb: Initiating sync with local master browser CLIENT<0x20> at IP 192.168.aaa.bbb for workgroup DOMAIN [2009/05/07 09:59:41, 2] nmbd/nmbd_synclists.c:sync_browse_lists(186) Initiating browse sync for DOMAIN to CLIENT(192.168.aaa.bbb) [2009/05/07 09:59:42, 2] nmbd/nmbd_synclists.c:complete_sync(304) sync with CLIENT(192.168.aaa.bbb) for workgroup DOMAIN completed (2 records) log.smbd - nothing relevant again: -- Steve Holdoway <steve@greengecko.co.nz&g...

...orkgroup FOOBAR name CLIENTE IP 192.168.20.2 ttl 1345823282 [2012/08/24 11:32:32, 2] nmbd/nmbd_browsesync.c:60(sync_with_lmb) sync_with_lmb: Initiating sync with local master browser CLIENTE<0x20> at IP 192.168.20.2 for workgroup FOOBAR [2012/08/24 11:32:32, 2] nmbd/nmbd_synclists.c:184(sync_browse_lists) Initiating browse sync for FOOBAR to CLIENTE(192.168.20.2) [2012/08/24 11:32:32, 3] lib/util_sock.c:1033(open_socket_out_send) Connecting to 192.168.20.2 at port 139 [2012/08/24 11:32:32, 2] nmbd/nmbd_synclists.c:302(complete_sync) sync with CLIENTE(192.168.20.2) for workgroup FOOBAR comp...

I noticed this error message within some of my users log files; rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c:_samr_query_aliasmem(2626) _samr_query_aliasmem: Not yet implemented. Why does this mean and what do I need to do to stop this error message from appearing. BTW, the users all have XP machines. Martin Stacey IT Support Manager Safcol Australia Pty Ltd

...PNW DATELFL ENG_SYS GUINAN FIBERBASE ABU IS MERIDEN.BCD.ADC SIGEDOM WORKGROUP nmbd is syncronizing it's browse lists with the domain controller: sync_browse_lists: Sync browse lists with GUINAN for ENG_SYS 155.226.44.5 Domain=[ENG_SYS] OS=[Windows NT 4.0] Server=[NT LAN Manager 4.0] Any ideas why my Samba server doesn't show up? Rob -- Rob Nielsen rob@adc.com ADC Telecommunications, Inc. (612) 896-2706 In a world without fences...

Hello. I've got a Samba server and I'd like it to be master browser and everything else except domain controller (the customers wants a workgroup, not a domain). Lately a Windows 2003 server was added to the net and then I guess it was removed. I keep getting messages like the following in the logs: > Apr 10 03:07:51 apocalypse nmbd[57552]: [2005/04/10 03:07:51, 0]

Hi, I have a Samba 3 PDC running with around 20 Windows XP/2K clients. The PDC and the clients are in different subnets. I recently decided to add a Samba 3 BDC in the same subnet as the clients, to give some failover and also to reduce across-switch traffic. After creating the BDC, I restarted one of the clients but don't see it establishing connection with the BDC, instead it connects as

...t 216.17.224.194 for workgroup MEANSPC, ttl: 60 [2003/06/12 13:34:51, 3, pid=12919, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] nmbd/nmbd_browsesync.c:sync_all_dmbs(704) Initiating DMB<->DMB sync with MELDROC(0.0.0.0) [2003/06/12 13:34:51, 2, pid=2357, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] nmbd/nmbd_synclists.c:sync_browse_lists(168) Initiating browse sync for DEBIAN_FANS to MELDROC(0.0.0.0) [2003/06/12 13:34:51, 3, pid=2357, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_out(676) Connecting to 192.168.100.3 at port 139 [2003/06/12 13:35:02, 3, pid=12919, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c...

...6.36.12 for w\ orkgroup TELTEC [2001/07/02 16:27:39, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_socket_addr(1084) getpeername failed. Error was Bad file number [2001/07/02 16:27:39, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_socket_addr(1084) getpeername failed. Error was Bad file number [2001/07/02 16:29:15, 2] nmbd/nmbd_synclists.c:sync_browse_lists(166) Initiating browse sync for VISION to JAVAMAN(0.0.0.0) [2001/07/02 16:29:16, 2] nmbd/nmbd_synclists.c:complete_sync(277) sync with JAVAMAN(0.0.0.0) for workgroup VISION completed (0 records) [2001/07/02 16:31:20, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_socket_addr(1084) getpeername failed. Error was Bad...