search for: sympathizing

On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 08:58, Jeff Cohen wrote: > On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 07:39:23 -0700 > Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote: > > > Yes, in fact I'd be daring enough to suggest that it be the standard. > > We'll have fewer compilation problems with VC++ 2005 because it is > > (supposedly) more standards compliant than previous versions. Please use >

...idea I had in mind is to, maybe, set the voicemail system (Audix) to cut messages after X minutes. I don't know for sure if the (Asterisk) caller is leaving a message or not, as most voicemail systems have a message size limit and drop the call anyway. Strange, huh? Any suggestions? opinions? sympathizing words? :-) Thanks in advance guys. Cheers, Gonzalo

Am 13.10.2015 um 14:02 schrieb Renato Golin: > On 13 October 2015 at 12:37, Joachim Durchholz via llvm-dev >> Just curious: Do people ever do it the other way around? > > What do you mean? Report first, then try to resolve directly. My experience is that people try to resolve things directly and ask for help only when they find it doesn't work, but YMMV.

Ughs, I'm not dying to wait months...but if it thats the way it is, then its the way it is. Tends to be so many commits in a day it seemed it was being lost in the noise/clique. I did try to add some notes to the bug tracker, but new logins are disabled, and the email to get one never replied...but I guess that's another topic! Thanks again, definitely alleviated some frustrations.

Mike hodson <mystica@darktech.org> writes: > Might I ask -how- precisely they banned all icecast servers. Perhaps the real question you should ask is..."should" anyone worry about this at all? Personally speaking, I've been streaming for quite a while (barring a few networking problems) and I've always seen the same behavior from the shoutcast (Nullsoft) people.

Thanks. I have gone that route and there was no response. What constitutes 'particularly urgent'? In regards to D30107<https://reviews.llvm.org/D30107> it some fairly obvious defect(s) and there are a few bugs open in your database about the issue, but it seems an area that doesn't get much interest (related to DynamicLibrary class). Thanks again.

On 01/24/17 19:00, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 01/24/2017 02:14 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> So, it installed happily. >> Then wouldn't boot. > > What did the storage configuration look like, exactly? I'd guess that you put > one partition on each disk, combined those in a RAID1 MD array, made than an > LVM physical volume, and then created filesystems and

Hi All, I don't have a "I need help" question, so much as a query into any update whether 'R' has made any progress with some of the core functions retaining classes. As an example, because it's one of the cases that most egregiously impacts me & my work and keeps pushing me away from 'R' and into other numerical languages (such as NumPy in python), I

Hi All, I don't have a "I need help" question, so much as a query into any update whether 'R' has made any progress with some of the core functions retaining classes. As an example, because it's one of the cases that most egregiously impacts me & my work and keeps pushing me away from 'R' and into other numerical languages (such as NumPy in python), I

Not that I sympathize with the OP's manners but... Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> writes: > On May 10, 2008, at 7:55 PM, kr512 wrote: > >> See how gcc is invoked to generate the final executable >> file. This means LLVM is an incomplete backend, >> unfortunately. >> > That's only a convenience. GCC generates assembly code too and calls

On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 07:39:23 -0700 Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote: > Yes, in fact I'd be daring enough to suggest that it be the standard. > We'll have fewer compilation problems with VC++ 2005 because it is > (supposedly) more standards compliant than previous versions. Please use > this download: While this may be true, it's not a realistic request. Even

On Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 4:36 PM Piviul via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > Il 07/03/20 21:27, Reindl Harald ha scritto: > > but given that such machines must not be in the normal environment > > anyways why do you need the latest and greatest samba? > but the same user can work on an old winxp or latest win10 machine and > have to share and access the same

nick said: > http://nickgravgaard.com/elastictabstops/ exactly. thanks for writing it up, nick. the only thing i'd add is the notion that tables should be copyfit to the viewport. if the viewport gives you plenty of room, give the columns some breathing space. if not, tighten them as much as needed. *** > http://readown.googlecode.com/ cool. now how about an

On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 00:17, Paolo Invernizzi wrote: > On Sep 15, 2004, at 8:40 AM, Henrik Bach wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Has some one committed these patches into CVS? > > Not yet... checked 10 minutes ago... Hopefully Chris will get to it today (Wednesday). > I'm attaching the cvs diff -u version of them (I've read Reid Spencer > post about it)

While I understand the people committing to the primarily C++ codebase of LLVM find it as additional burden, far more number of people enjoy the benefits of an official LLVM C API support than are vocal here. While Clang maybe the first-class LLVM citizen for the foreseeable future, I can tell you LLVM is used in many more situations (I'm talking about Rust, Go, Julia, DLang, etc.) than this

You didn't answer all of the questions I asked, but I'll answer as best I can with the information you gave. On 01/25/2017 04:47 AM, mark wrote: > > Made an md RAID 0 on the raw disks - /dev/sda /dev/sdb. No partitions, > nothing. OK, so right off the bat we have to note that this is not a configuration supported by Red Hat. It is possible to set such a system up, but it

On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 14:30, Joshua M. Brown wrote: > Would someone pleeeeeeease put a filter on this list to stop all the > nonsense messages my inbox keeps getting hit with from this list? > > thanks. > > j > I second that. It's getting insane.

Hello I'm totally newbie with this I wanted to ask this on the forum but from some reason I can't register... so if you guys can help me I'll be very glad.. do I have to do change something in the Icecast xml file? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/icecast/attachments/20100526/20e2f7cb/attachment.htm

I did a clean install to freepbx 2.6.1 and now when i do *76 i get a 1 second flash on the screen then the phone hangs up. the FOP says it is on DND but some ext are still getting calls. once i do a *76 FOP still says I am on dnd. I am running asterisk 1.6.0.21. before i was getting a message like dnd activated and dnd deactivated. i posted this on the freepbx site and here is what i got

HI list, When I am on my linux box I can send files from xp to linux. I canNOT send files from linux to xp. I get unsupported action error box pop up. I have spent days on this now and I still don't know why. any ideas Blair