search for: sympathize

...affect LLVm because nobody ever tried compiling this with older VC++ versions. I'm advocating the latest so that we have fewer "upgrade" problems going forward. > I've > personally been involved with two such upgrades, from 5 to 6 and 6 to > 7.1 and it's a pain. I sympathize, that's why I'm trying to push the compiler version as far forward as possible to avoid pain later on. > The project files are not converted correctly. We won't use VC++ project files. You'll still have to compile with cygwin tools. There's just too many other dependencies...

Hi guys, I'm interconnecting an Asterisk box with a Lucent Definity PBX by means of FXO/FXS ports on a TDM2400 card. Everything works well, except for one little thing. Every now and then somebody (from an Asterisk extension) will call another extension on the Lucent Definity PBX and they hit their voicemail. They caller leaves their message (or not) and hangup, BUT the Lucent sometimes

Am 13.10.2015 um 14:02 schrieb Renato Golin: > On 13 October 2015 at 12:37, Joachim Durchholz via llvm-dev >> Just curious: Do people ever do it the other way around? > > What do you mean? Report first, then try to resolve directly. My experience is that people try to resolve things directly and ask for help only when they find it doesn't work, but YMMV.

...o the relevant review(s), which will notify the people who filed the bug or cc'd themselves to it. This is not to say that they will necessarily want to review it, but it's worth doing. > but it seems an area that doesn't get much interest (related to > DynamicLibrary class). I sympathize; it can be very hard to get reviews for changes to the more obscure (or less interesting) parts of the code base. > Thanks again. You're welcome. I promise you I have been where you are! --paulr -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://li...

...they have a history of repeatedly changing -something- about their protocol so that icecast cannot list on their servers. Recently, Nullsoft has (finally) expressed their desire to exclude icecast from their lists. Political speculation aside, it's quite clear we are not wanted there. While I sympathize with those hardy engineers who have to implement according to the hypnotic marketing suggestion that "shoutcast.com is the place to list", I don't think continuing to get ourselves listed there is going to be productive at all. It's a game of escalation. > Is it in the way a...

Thanks. I have gone that route and there was no response. What constitutes 'particularly urgent'? In regards to D30107<https://reviews.llvm.org/D30107> it some fairly obvious defect(s) and there are a few bugs open in your database about the issue, but it seems an area that doesn't get much interest (related to DynamicLibrary class). Thanks again.

On 01/24/17 19:00, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 01/24/2017 02:14 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> So, it installed happily. >> Then wouldn't boot. > > What did the storage configuration look like, exactly? I'd guess that you put > one partition on each disk, combined those in a RAID1 MD array, made than an > LVM physical volume, and then created filesystems and

...sses. Ack!! In the example I give above, the impact might seem small, but the implications are *huge*. This means that I am, in effect, not allowed to use *any* of the vectoring functions in 'R', which avoid performing loops thereby speeding up process time extraordinarily. Many can sympathize that 'R' is ridiculously slow with "for" loops, compared to other languages. But that's theoretically OK, a good statistician or data analyst should be able to work comfortably with matrices and vectors. However, *'R' cannot work comfortably* with matrices or vectors...

...sses. Ack!! In the example I give above, the impact might seem small, but the implications are *huge*. This means that I am, in effect, not allowed to use *any* of the vectoring functions in 'R', which avoid performing loops thereby speeding up process time extraordinarily. Many can sympathize that 'R' is ridiculously slow with "for" loops, compared to other languages. But that's theoretically OK, a good statistician or data analyst should be able to work comfortably with matrices and vectors. However, *'R' cannot work comfortably* with matrices or vectors...

Not that I sympathize with the OP's manners but... Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> writes: > On May 10, 2008, at 7:55 PM, kr512 wrote: > >> See how gcc is invoked to generate the final executable >> file. This means LLVM is an incomplete backend, >> unfortunately. >> >...

On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 07:39:23 -0700 Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote: > Yes, in fact I'd be daring enough to suggest that it be the standard. > We'll have fewer compilation problems with VC++ 2005 because it is > (supposedly) more standards compliant than previous versions. Please use > this download: While this may be true, it's not a realistic request. Even

...involving 30-year mortgages, so it *had* to be accessible for decades. Samba access to fileservers was critical. Maintaining compatibility with newer file services and access control was not trivial, and it was not cheap in consulting time, and I was permitted to publish my notes. So I absolutely sympathize with your difficulty. > > use RHEL8 or something with 10 years support and plug the network with > > the xp machines on a second NIC for security > > > > and 15 years: forget it, at least if you care for security update son > > teh server > yes but it is not so sim...

nick said: > http://nickgravgaard.com/elastictabstops/ exactly. thanks for writing it up, nick. the only thing i'd add is the notion that tables should be copyfit to the viewport. if the viewport gives you plenty of room, give the columns some breathing space. if not, tighten them as much as needed. *** > http://readown.googlecode.com/ cool. now how about an

On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 00:17, Paolo Invernizzi wrote: > On Sep 15, 2004, at 8:40 AM, Henrik Bach wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Has some one committed these patches into CVS? > > Not yet... checked 10 minutes ago... Hopefully Chris will get to it today (Wednesday). > I'm attaching the cvs diff -u version of them (I've read Reid Spencer > post about it)

...uture, I can tell you LLVM is used in many more situations (I'm talking about Rust, Go, Julia, DLang, etc.) than this alias realized. I alone am using it interesting projects I hope to release sometime this year and all of these projects rely on the comfort of the "official" C API. I sympathize with the community that is not using them but having to still maintain and fix bugs. To those of you (on this thread and others) who are wanting to remove the C API from the project, please tell the community what can be done to improve the situation. Do we need bots? People writing tests? I would...

...re advanced knowledge of grub2 and mdadm. Because the vendor doesn't support this configuration, and as you've seen, the tools don't always parse out the information they need, you'll forever be responsible for fixing any boot problems that come up. Do you really want that? I sympathize. I wanted to use full disk RAID, too. I thought that replacing disks would be much easier this way, since there'd just be one md RAID device to manage. That was an attractive option after working with hardware RAID controllers that were easy to manage but expensive, unreliable, and perfo...

On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 14:30, Joshua M. Brown wrote: > Would someone pleeeeeeease put a filter on this list to stop all the > nonsense messages my inbox keeps getting hit with from this list? > > thanks. > > j > I second that. It's getting insane.

Hello I'm totally newbie with this I wanted to ask this on the forum but from some reason I can't register... so if you guys can help me I'll be very glad.. do I have to do change something in the Icecast xml file? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/icecast/attachments/20100526/20e2f7cb/attachment.htm

I did a clean install to freepbx 2.6.1 and now when i do *76 i get a 1 second flash on the screen then the phone hangs up. the FOP says it is on DND but some ext are still getting calls. once i do a *76 FOP still says I am on dnd. I am running asterisk 1.6.0.21. before i was getting a message like dnd activated and dnd deactivated. i posted this on the freepbx site and here is what i got

HI list, When I am on my linux box I can send files from xp to linux. I canNOT send files from linux to xp. I get unsupported action error box pop up. I have spent days on this now and I still don't know why. any ideas Blair