search for: sympathetic

...5c9f4dcf38458099db8a0bf4659a07ef055d changed all the code > to use Jansson instead of yajl. However it didn't change the OCaml > API name (which was still Yajl). > Are you aware that Jansson can't parse all JSON generated by qemu, and that the developers of Jansson did not seem sympathetic to patches that would make it possible? Libvirt recently reverted their use of Jansson because of its inability to deal with unsigned 64-bit numbers (and sadly, RFC7159 does not define bounds for what forms valid JSON numbers, but merely leaves it up to implementations to decide for themselves...

> I'm not necessarily sympathetic to the idea of adding another canonicalization pass only for this purpose. The problem is that as you said, SimplifyCfg does all sorts of stuff, and I suspect is not the fastest pass in the world. Also, in the case that annoys me, there is an LCSSA pass in the middle, and I suspect it would be a...

It would be nice just for once to actually use a mailing list with people who are a little more sympathetic to the fact that your not a rocket scentist or molecular biologist and that you might actually need some help, without being made to feel like your completely useless and should be cleaning toilets for a living. "Ahhh man not another stupid newbie question! are these people completely lazy an...

...I won't get to it quickly, but it will give me something to focus on. At 11/18/2020 04:17 PM, Thomas Lively wrote: >Yes, the CodeGenDAGPatterns is exactly right. Try applying the patch below and rebuilding and you'll see what I mean about the error messages ;) That being said, I'm sympathetic to Matt's point about shifting effort to GlobalISel. Maybe it has similar problems you could work on? A nicer development experience would certainly be a good carrot to get me excited to switch over sooner.

> I don't know how feasible this is to roll out on linux or other platforms > which may or may not have sympathetic libc maintainers. Assuming they aren't > sympathetic, you only have one less-great option IMO. That is that you hack > Clang to pattern match a well-known AST pattern into the > __builtin_errno_address builtin. For targets without a well-known pattern, > it would never add the &q...

...fic term, than you need to ask somewhere, > and I think the list is good for that. Sure. So say, "I tried a Googling for X, but I didn't have any luck. Then I looked at pages X and Y in the Wiki, but couldn't find anything that related to my problem." People are a lot more sympathetic if you demonstrate you've made some effort to find the answer on your own.

Hi, I was looking at Rust programs which are poorly optimized by LLVM, and one occasional factor is that LLVM allows for long-lived `br i1 false` instructions. The problem is that if a propagation pass discovers the condition of a branch, the branch itself will not be eliminated until a SimpllfyCfg pass is reached, of which there are few in the pipeline. One example is

...to failure. I''ve no idea what their page sizes might be nor what boundaries their wear levelling (if any) operate on. Their normal mode of operation is to use a "FAT32" filesystem and to be filled up linearly with large files. I guess the more scattered layout of extN is non-too sympathetic to their normal operation. The high-end (b) may well have 4kByte pages or smaller but they will typically operate with multiple page chunks that are much larger, where 16kBytes appear to be the optimum performance size for the devices I''ve seen so far. How well does btrfs fit in with t...

...il's advocate here) the S > language, and not just the source code, is the intellectual property of > Lucent. My understanding is that languages cannot be protected but implementations can. We would also have to attacked in a New Zealand court and I doubt that they would be particularly sympathetic to Mathsoft. John Chambers has told us that he is sympathetic and supportive of R development and has often discussed internal details of S with us. At the last Interface meeting he was asked whether he might make Sv4 "free". He didn't completely rule it out, but I think the recent...

He has tried this and it does not solve the problem. The problem is that someone wants to, for example, time a dsp instruction. THe dsp instruction has no side effects and does not access memory. It's a valid thing to do. Should be some way to do this I would think. Tia. Reed On 02/21/2014 11:24 AM, Tim Northover wrote: > Hi Reed, > >> How would this intrinsic be implemented

...eb server using InstantRails. When I check OnLamp tutorial carefully, sure enough there is a link to an updated version using InstantRails. My question then: Should I install InstantRails? If I do, do I need to uninstall Ruby, Rails, and mySQL database first? My boss is likely to be less than sympathetic if I make a mess of my PC by experimenting with a new system. I was hoping to develop the web application FIRST, without drawing attention to myself and THEN make the case for using RoR. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Are you talking about the type checking done in CodeGenDAGPatterns.cpp? Is it easy to post an example? At 11/18/2020 01:55 PM, Thomas Lively wrote: >Hi Paul, > >I think this would be time well spent. At least in the WebAssembly backend, the vast majority of our ISel work is still done with DAG ISel. I know this is different from the performance work you have in mind, but one of my

...e no patches to land which use new features > of CMake, so I’m not actually pushing to raise the minimum version today. > As I see it, this conversation is more about establishing a policy, and > determining what qualifies as a justification to update CMake versions. > So, I'm very sympathetic to the desire to make the CMake build better. However, I also am sympathetic to wanting to make it super easy for a new developer to download build and start using LLVM. I don't think we can make an effective tradeoff here without specific context. In the absence of specific features which wou...

...the code >>> to use Jansson instead of yajl. However it didn't change the OCaml >>> API name (which was still Yajl). >>> >> >> Are you aware that Jansson can't parse all JSON generated by qemu, >> and that the developers of Jansson did not seem sympathetic to >> patches that would make it possible? Libvirt recently reverted >> their use of Jansson because of its inability to deal with unsigned >> 64-bit numbers (and sadly, RFC7159 does not define bounds for what >> forms valid JSON numbers, but merely leaves it up to implemen...

This is a question about the use of the Cox proportional hazards model to analyze event histories. I am looking at the responses of sympathetic nervous system activity to a stimulus. The activity I observe is a burst that can only occur once per heart beat cycle (e.g., a binary count). Typically bursts occur in 60-80% of the heart cycles * sensory stimuli can modify these burst probabilities. I give 48 stimuli-trials at random intervals...

----- Original Message ----- > On 9/17/2013 2:43 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: > > > > That would depend on how this attribute was used; it could only be > > used by a pass that did actually understand what those side > > effects were (like the loop vectorizer understanding that, if > > errno is ignored, then vectorizing cos() is legal). I don't object > > to

...ust >> an oversight? > > May guess is "oversight" || "well let's keep it simple" > Do you (all readers) see situation where it could harm now (with > the 20'000 packages on CRAN+BIoc+...) to do as SV4 (S version 4) has been doing? > > I'd be sympathetic to class()ing it. > Martin > >> Bill Dunlap TIBCO Software wdunlap tibco.com > > ______________________________________________ > R-devel at r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Jeremy Allison via samba composed on 2020-04-24 11:13 (UTC-0700): > On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 04:31:53AM -0400, Felix Miata via samba wrote: >> Jeremy Allison via samba composed on 2020-04-23 09:24 (UTC-0700): >> >> CIFS: Attempting to mount //hostname/E >> >> Use of the less secure dialect vers=1.0 is not recommended unless required for >> >> access

...eems to have petered out a couple of years ago, not to mention being a pile of work I really don't have time for as well as requiring overcoming non-trivial objections. I realise that this is not the OpenSSH team's problem as such, and that as a LibreSSL developer you may well not be super-sympathetic to this argument; but nevertheless, I don't think this is a viable option right now for us as a distributor. -- Colin Watson [cjwatson at debian.org]

Hello, I've got Tripplite Smart Int 1000 UPS with lan4.1 serial interface. Quite sympathetic UPS, I must say from first glance. I have made a proper serial cable (btw i hate all those constructor's decisions to make distinct serial wiring for each and every UPS type from each and every manufacturer!) I use [tripplite] driver for NUT and I can use upsc to get report from UPS, but s...