search for: sx1

Hi, i am using on my machine Postfix with Cyrus_SASL in smtpd.conf i have saslauthd as method used,but even if i have it , this is what postfix writes into log messages Dec 13 00:02:03 sx1 postfix/smtpd[17833]: auxpropfunc error invalid parameter supplied Dec 13 00:08:07 sx1 postfix/smtpd[17856]: auxpropfunc error invalid parameter supplied Dec 13 00:08:07 sx1 postfix/smtpd[17858]: auxpropfunc error invalid parameter supplied Dec 13 00:08:07 sx1 postfix/smtpd[17859]: auxpropfunc erro...

Hello , i want all my log messages from python to have in /var/log/python Now they are in /var/log/messages: Jun 9 12:10:51 sx1 kernel: klogd 1.4.1, log source = /proc/kmsg started. Jun 9 12:11:01 sx1 python: MM_MEMBERS [it] Nothing to do. Jun 9 12:11:02 sx1 python: MM_MEMBERS [research] Nothing to do. Jun 9 12:12:01 sx1 python: MM_MEMBERS [it] Nothing to do. Jun 9 12:12:01 sx1 python: MM_MEMBERS [research] Nothing to d...

...the internet hostname of this # mail system. The default is to use the fully-qualified domain name # from gethostname(). $myhostname is used as a default value for many # other configuration parameters. # #myhostname = host.domain.tld myhostname = mail.hlacik.eu *service postfix restart* [root at sx1 postfix]# postconf -d myhostname *myhostname = sx1.labs.hlacik.eu* What is wrong?? I have Centos5.2 with latest updates. D. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20081013/e6ed11a0/attachment-0003....

...n) [1] -7.105427e-15 s1-s2[[2]] ## R versus manual sum (Fortran [1] -7.105427e-15 s1-s3 ## R Versus manual sum in C [1] -7.105427e-15 s2[[2]]-s2[[1]] ## manual sum versus compiler sum() (Fortran) [1] 0 s3-s2[[2]] ## Fortran versus C [1] 0 My sumf and sumc are subroutine sumf(x, n, sx1, sx2) integer i, n double precision x(n), sx1, sx2 sx1 = sum(x) sx2 = 0.0d0 do i=1,n sx2 = sx2+x(i) end do end void sumc(double *x, int *n, double *sum) { int i; double sum1 = 0.0; for (i=0; i< *n; i++) { sum1 += x[i];...

...noise dots do.sim<-function(nnoise, nsignal, jump) { ntotal<-nsignal+nnoise x<<-NULL y<<-NULL x.temp<-0 y.temp<-0 #generate noise dots nx1<-runif(nnoise,0,4095) nx2<-runif(nnoise,0,4095) ny1<-runif(nnoise,0,4095) ny2<-runif(nnoise,0,4095) #generate signal dots sx1<-runif(nsignal,0,4095) sx2<-sx1 sy1<-runif(nsignal,0,4095) sy2<-sy1+jump sy2<-ifelse(sy2>4095, sy2-4096,sy2) #wrap around #put noise and signal dots together tx1<-c(nx1,sx1) tx2<-c(nx2,sx2) ty1<-c(ny1,sy1) ty2<-c(ny2,sy2) #compute distance to nearest neighbour (x and...

...C >> >> [1] -7.105427e-15 >> >> s2[[2]]-s2[[1]] ## manual sum versus compiler sum() (Fortran) >> >> [1] 0 >> >> s3-s2[[2]] ## Fortran versus C >> >> [1] 0 >> >> My sumf and sumc are >> >> subroutine sumf(x, n, sx1, sx2) >> integer i, n >> double precision x(n), sx1, sx2 >> sx1 = sum(x) >> sx2 = 0.0d0 >> do i=1,n >> sx2 = sx2+x(i) >> end do >> end >> >> void sumc(double *x, int *n, double *sum) >> { &g...

...-7.105427e-15 > > s1-s3 ## R Versus manual sum in C > > [1] -7.105427e-15 > > s2[[2]]-s2[[1]] ## manual sum versus compiler sum() (Fortran) > > [1] 0 > > s3-s2[[2]] ## Fortran versus C > > [1] 0 > > My sumf and sumc are > > subroutine sumf(x, n, sx1, sx2) > integer i, n > double precision x(n), sx1, sx2 > sx1 = sum(x) > sx2 = 0.0d0 > do i=1,n > sx2 = sx2+x(i) > end do > end > > void sumc(double *x, int *n, double *sum) > { > int i; > double sum1 = 0.0; > fo...

..., NVC0_3D(CB_SIZE), 3); + PUSH_DATA (push, 256); + PUSH_DATA (push, (pNv->scratch->offset + PVP_DATA) >> 32); + PUSH_DATA (push, (pNv->scratch->offset + PVP_DATA)); + BEGIN_1IC0(push, NVC0_3D(CB_POS), 3 * (4 + 2 + 2) + 1); + PUSH_DATA (push, 0x80); + + PUSH_DATAf(push, sx1); + PUSH_DATAf(push, sy1); + PUSH_DATAf(push, 0); + PUSH_DATAf(push, 1); + PUSH_DATAf(push, tx1); + PUSH_DATAf(push, ty1); + PUSH_DATAf(push, 0); + PUSH_DATAf(push, 0); + + PUSH_DATAf(push, sx2+(sx2-sx1)); + PUSH_DATAf(push, sy1); + PUSH_DATAf(push, 0); + PUSH_DATAf(push, 1);...

..., NVC0_3D(CB_SIZE), 3); + PUSH_DATA (push, 256); + PUSH_DATA (push, (pNv->scratch->offset + PVP_DATA) >> 32); + PUSH_DATA (push, (pNv->scratch->offset + PVP_DATA)); + BEGIN_1IC0(push, NVC0_3D(CB_POS), 3 * (4 + 2 + 2) + 1); + PUSH_DATA (push, 0x80); + + PUSH_DATAf(push, sx1); + PUSH_DATAf(push, sy1); + PUSH_DATAf(push, 0); + PUSH_DATAf(push, 1); + PUSH_DATAf(push, tx1); + PUSH_DATAf(push, ty1); + PUSH_DATAf(push, 0); + PUSH_DATAf(push, 0); + + PUSH_DATAf(push, sx2+(sx2-sx1)); + PUSH_DATAf(push, sy1); + PUSH_DATAf(push, 0); + PUSH_DATAf(push, 1);...

...SH_DATA (push, 256); > + PUSH_DATA (push, (pNv->scratch->offset + PVP_DATA) >> 32); > + PUSH_DATA (push, (pNv->scratch->offset + PVP_DATA)); > + BEGIN_1IC0(push, NVC0_3D(CB_POS), 3 * (4 + 2 + 2) + 1); > + PUSH_DATA (push, 0x80); > + > + PUSH_DATAf(push, sx1); > + PUSH_DATAf(push, sy1); > + PUSH_DATAf(push, 0); > + PUSH_DATAf(push, 1); > + PUSH_DATAf(push, tx1); > + PUSH_DATAf(push, ty1); > + PUSH_DATAf(push, 0); > + PUSH_DATAf(push, 0); > + > + PUSH_DATAf(push, sx2+(sx2-sx1)); > + PUSH_DATAf(push, sy1);...

...oard (ARM11MPCore) > realview-pb-a8 ARM RealView Platform Baseboard for Cortex-A8 > realview-pbx-a9 ARM RealView Platform Baseboard Explore for Cortex-A9 > smdkc210 Samsung SMDKC210 board (Exynos4210) > spitz Sharp SL-C3000 (Spitz) PDA (PXA270) > sx1 Siemens SX1 (OMAP310) V2 > sx1-v1 Siemens SX1 (OMAP310) V1 > terrier Sharp SL-C3200 (Terrier) PDA (PXA270) > tosa Sharp SL-6000 (Tosa) PDA (PXA255) > verdex Gumstix Verdex (PXA270) > versatileab ARM Ve...

Dear all Please see the following module, In module SX3 SX4 and SX5 have similar class Tasklist, but inherit from different class. I will use the following code to connect to different data sources RemoteSX3Model.establish_connection sx3_hash RemoteSX4Model.establish_connection sx4_hash RemoteSX5Model.establish_connection sx5_hash How can I refactor my code in module to look simpler? Thank you

...;"),m[k]) , assign(paste("m",1,sep=""),v[k]) ) ) } The above seems like a lot of work for such a simple feat, no? Also, I CANNot get the following to work in a loop manor: Ux1i<-as.integer(Ux1) Ux2i<-as.integer(Ux2) Ux3i<-as.integer(Ux3) or Sx1<-sort(Ux1i) Sx2<-sort(Ux2i) Sx3<-sort(Ux3i) Maybe I am just not using matrixes enough? but even that seems quite a lot more complex than calling x<-matrix() then grabbing values by x[j][k]...(java style if i remember correctly). the matrix help in R dosnt make much sense to me. And a...

...rmCoord(state->unit[0].transform, srcX, srcY - height, + state->unit[0].width, state->unit[0].height, + &sX0, &sY0); + NV30EXATransformCoord(state->unit[0].transform, srcX, srcY + height, + state->unit[0].width, state->unit[0].height, + &sX1, &sY1); NV30EXATransformCoord(state->unit[0].transform, - srcX, srcY + height, - state->unit[0].width, - state->unit[0].height, &sX1, &sY1); - NV30EXATransformCoord(state->unit[0].transform, - srcX + 2*width, srcY + height, - state->unit[0].width, - st...

I believe I've addressed all the feedback from the first time around, and also made fixes necessary for GM20x based on testing results. I believe now it should actually work for all GM10x and GM20x. Further, GP10x should be very easy to add, but without someone to actually test I didn't want to claim support for it. Ilia Mirkin (7): exa: add GM10x acceleration support hwdefs: update

..., int height) { - ScrnInfoPtr pScrn = xf86Screens[pDst->drawable.pScreen->myNum]; + ScrnInfoPtr pScrn = xf86Screens[pix_dst->drawable.pScreen->myNum]; NVPtr pNv = NVPTR(pScrn); struct nouveau_channel *chan = pNv->chan; struct nouveau_grobj *celsius = pNv->Nv3D; - float sX0, sX1, sX2, sY0, sY1, sY2, sX3, sY3; - float mX0, mX1, mX2, mY0, mY1, mY2, mX3, mY3; + PicturePtr mask = pNv->pmpict, + src = pNv->pspict; + PictVector dstq[4] = QUAD(dstX, dstY, width, height), + maskq[4] = QUAD(maskX, maskY, width, height), + srcq[4] = QUAD(srcX, srcY, width, height); + + MAP(...

...im<-function(nnoise, nsignal, jump) { ntotal<-nsignal+nnoise x<-numeric(ntotal) y<-numeric(ntotal) #generate noise dots nx1<-round(runif(nnoise,0,4095)) nx2<-round(runif(nnoise,0,4095)) ny1<-round(runif(nnoise,0,4095)) ny2<-round(runif(nnoise,0,4095)) #generate signal dots sx1<-round(runif(nsignal,0,4095)) ... and I need to do do.sim(0,1000,10). But that gives me NAs which are a problem later. (in particular, I can't do if(rr<rbest) if rr is computed from an NA.) BTW I think it is a ghastly waste of resources to do round(runif(nnoise,0,4095)) but I couldn'...