search for: swpd

...ips). I 'd like to ask if it is normal and how I can improve the the performance of samba server.The version of my using samba is 3.0.30. The following is the state of vmstat during the test. 1. TCP test # vmstat 1 procs memory swap io system cpu r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy wa id 0 0 0 2100 2392 109740 0 0 7 3 859 94 1 4 0 94 0 0 0 2100 2392 109740 0 0 0 0 342 24 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 2100 2392 109740 0 0 0 0 189 12 0 1...

...p 2:01, 1 user, load average: 7.02, 7.47, 11.84 USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE JCPU PCPU WHAT root pts/0 208.92.169.4.ppp 11:25 0.00s 0.02s 0.00s w [root at server ~]# vmstat procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- --system-- ----cpu---- r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa 0 2 0 1558496 456916 1087224 0 0 198 749 795 537 18 4 27 50 The above is when its running pretty good. Matt

..., seems little laggy when moving up and down the message index list. Network latency seems low < 30ms on average. So I was tracking vmstat. On the mutt instances is seems reasonable: [nic@shell:~] vmstat 3 procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- --system-- ----cpu---- r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa 0 0 0 144464 4 127748 0 0 0 0 36 6 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 144464 4 127748 0 0 0 0 87 67 1 0 99 0 0 0 0 144464 4 127748 0 0 0 0 90 83 0 0 1...

Hi, I am currently running a 10 Node OCFS2 Cluster (version 1.3.9-0ubuntu1) on Ubuntu Server 8.04 x86_64. Linux n1 2.6.24-24-server #1 SMP Tue Jul 7 19:39:36 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux The Cluster is connected to a 1Tera iSCSI Device presented by an IBM 3300 Storage System, running over a 1Gig Network. Mounted on all nodes: /dev/sdc1 on /cfs1 type ocfs2

...fsb) , 1 GB RAM (533mhz ddr) , 2 SATA 80GB DISK in RAID 0 via software RAID driver. Two Intel PRO 10/100 NIC, IRQs are separated, an X100P so not to use ztdummy. Motherboard is an Intel 945GNT. output of vmstat procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- --system-- ----cpu---- r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa 2 0 0 493284 44996 290924 0 0 2 16 247 116 3 2 95 0 cat /proc/interrupts CPU0 CPU1 0: 24778955 24730655 IO-APIC-edge timer 1: 8 0 IO-APIC-edge i8042 8...

...trftime("%F %T %Z"),$2,$3,$4,$5,$6,$7}' >> ~/memfree_20100118_140845.o; R code: infile.vms <- "~/vmstat_20100118_133845.o"; infile.mem <- "~/memfree_20100118_140845.o"; vms.colnames <- c("time","r","b","swpd","free","inact","active","si","so","bi","bo","in","cs","us","sy","id","wa","st"); vms.colclass <- c("character",rep("integer",l...

...a A104. This system is currently idle, that means there is nothing running except Asterisk (1.2.7.1). We are handling no calls now, but if I do a vmstat, I get peaks in system load up to 40%! Here is an example: procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- --system-- ----cpu---- r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa 0 0 0 375080 161660 142232 0 0 0 0 4160 187 0 4 96 0 0 0 0 375080 161660 142232 0 0 0 0 4251 207 0 1 98 0 0 0 0 375080 161660 142232 0 0 0 0 4205 179 0 9 92...

...mailboxes ever reach 1GB so we are "over-booking"). It is a relatively low-load server. Memory status and config follows below. Thanks, Nick The server memory condition is as follows: # vmstat procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- --system-- -----cpu------ r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa st 0 0 92 62400 212324 1299604 0 0 397 235 70 39 4 2 89 4 0 # free -m total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 2010 1951 59 0 20...

...But none of process still work, top have no process > 0,xx and also iotop value are > 0,xx. This is the vmstat output: > [root at s-doc ~]# vmstat 2 10 > procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- --system-- -----cpu----- > r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa st > 0 0 18884 131984 86508 246500 0 0 2 10 9 9 1 0 99 0 0 > 0 0 18884 131976 86508 246500 0 0 0 6 126 542 0 0 99 1 0 > 0 0 18884 131976 86508 246500 0 0 0...

...server is running production (but non-critical) virtual machines, so it is always running the openVZ kernel. So here is what I've done for now: - Top shows a load of about 0.4 - vmstat 1 10 shows this: procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- --system-- ----cpu---- r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa 0 0 592 191092 381720 537956 0 0 53 68 4 3 3 2 93 2 0 0 592 190720 381720 537956 0 0 0 0 32 60 1 1 98 0 0 0 592 191092 381720 537956 0 0 0 0 41 59 0...

...ld imagine i should see better figures that this and less machine load. Can anyone give any pointers as to where to start looking to pinpoint this issue? A vmstat gives me.. [root at xxxxxxxx02 ~]# vmstat 5 procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- --system-- ----cpu---- r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa 0 1 176 16960 1020 3972300 0 0 719 14298 238 257 0 5 45 50 0 2 176 15616 1028 3973332 0 0 1626 29760 6939 12881 0 5 44 51 1 1 176 15944 1036 3973324 0 0 1674 29721 7063 130...

...buffers cached Mem: 321044 312068 8976 0 44984 98648 -/+ buffers/cache: 168436 152608 Swap: 655352 480 654872 [root at gatekeeper bin]# vmstat procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- --system-- ----cpu---- r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa 0 0 480 8976 44992 98676 0 0 3 4 8 5 6 2 90 1 I've found the following error in syslog: ============================================================================ Mar 3 21:54:07 gatekeeper n...

...um-updatesd .... Running the above "ps -ef|grep yum" again after composing this email, process 2229 is still running (several minutes later). And this machine isn't particularly busy: # vmstat procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- --system-- -----cpu------ r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa st 0 0 64 42268 73752 139556 0 0 0 2 8 4 1 0 99 0 0 -- Find research and analysis on US healthcare, health insurance, and health policy at: <http://healthpolicydaily.blogspot.com/>

...0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 keventd 4 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 keventd 5 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 keventd ~# vmstat 5 procs memory swap io system cpu r b w swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id 0 0 0 624740 6612 141484 222308 25 25 6 0 12 5 4 9 6 0 0 0 624740 6592 141488 222324 0 0 2 230 177 501 3 2 95 4 0 0 624740 6536 141492 222348 0 0 1 29 142 85...

...3378% 483328 samples in 60.411915 sec. (483296 sample intervals) 99.993378% 483328 samples in 60.411918 sec. (483296 sample intervals) 99.993378% Estimate 8 frame slips every 15.104000 seconds. Results of vmstat 1 procs memory swap io system cpu r b w swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id 0 0 0 0 65108 13224 35340 0 0 0 24 1115 185 0 17 83 1 0 0 0 65108 13224 35340 0 0 0 0 1113 178 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 65108 13224 35340 0 0 0 0 1113 180 0 0 100 0 0 0...

...0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ctxt 35284048 btime 1231271275 processes 292966 procs_running 1 procs_blocked 0 # vmstat procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- --system-- -----cpu------ r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa st 0 0 0 3220064 163084 412172 0 0 5 29 183 438 1 7 91 0 0 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090107/2255...

...eems to buffer arround 100MB with no problem, at that point data is written to disk and both the ftp upload and the stream pause for 5 seconds and then continue. (This is output from vmstat streaming a video) procs memory swap io system cpu r b w swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id 0 0 0 0 59804 215000 691484 0 0 0 0 1110 226 0 1 99 0 0 0 0 58776 215000 692512 0 0 1028 0 1158 234 1 0 100 0 0 0 0 58776 215000 692512 0 0 0 0 1116 226 0 1...

I made the mistake of looking at disk IO numbers in two different ways -- now I'm confused, because they give inconsistent answers. First way was using 'vmstat 10'. This gave me (apologies for wrapped lines): r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa st 2 0 2162944 4071928 162444 4218456 0 0 0 286 1103 528 3 2 95 0 0 1 0 2162944 4071976 162448 4218440 0 0 0 301 1102 548 2 4 95 0 0 2 0 2162944 4074488 162456 4218448 0 0 0 252 1097...

...7% sy, 0.0% ni, 14.5% id, 40.0% wa, 0.0% hi, 1.6% si Mem: 4933508k total, 3182216k used, 1751292k free, 376096k buffers Swap: 2096472k total, 43284k used, 2053188k free, 2441860k cached # vmstat 1 procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- --system-- ----cpu---- r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa 0 8 43284 1722884 376200 2472696 0 0 35 9 6 29 47 15 27 11 0 8 43284 1717188 376228 2478388 0 0 3972 13688 7673 4314 11 22 18 49 9 5 43284 1709188 376268 2486148 0 0 3744 10896 6239 1890 2...

...sue or not. # uname -a Linux XXXXXXXXXXXX 2.4.21-9.ELsmp #1 SMP Thu Jan 8 16:54:23 EST 2004 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux # cat /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS release 3 (Taroon Update 1) # vmstat 5 procs memory swap io system cpu r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa 0 0 56 18936 125016 1846508 0 0 0 4 55 18 0 0 39 0 0 0 56 18936 125016 1846508 0 0 0 6 104 18 0 0 100 0 0 0 56 18936 125016 1846508 0 0 0 0 102 20 0...