search for: swithcing

I have been trying to set up printer sharing on the LAN.All machines are CentOS 5.2 fully updated. The problem server is a fresh build. The box it is replacing worked fine for many months. The problem appears to be a closed port 631 on the new box. iptables and ip6tables are stopped as shown by the output below. To confirm I was using nmap correctly I ran it against the old server first which

hi - i have a randon but recreatable problem whereby my transport.responseText seems to get truncated. I have tried swithcing btwn onSuccess and onComplete buit it happens on both. As i said it''s totally random. any ideas ? what other info di i need to provide ? many thanks --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rub...

when i tail -f my log: i find this: "Completed in 0.00233 (428 reqs/sec) | Rendering: 0.00005 (2%) | DB: 0.00118 (50%)" i am sure, this request didn''t access DB. but why here DB is (50%) it''s log wrong or my fault? regards -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hello everyone, i have been searching the whole day, trying ANY solution offered by the internet and before headbanging against the wall would like to try asking for your help. As many others, i am haveing problems loading the Rcmdr package with Macbook running Tiger 10.4.11. X11 version updated to the last one after having manually installed. I have also installed (obviously) the Rcmdr package

...NICODE WHICH IS NOT PROPERLY ADDRESSED HERE. > -> The UID returned by SOlr is to be considered as a STRING (and that is maybe the source of problem of the "out of bound" errors in fts_solr dovecot, as "long" is not enough) THIS IS JUST HIGHLY VISIBLE IN SOLR SCHEMA.XML. SWITHCING IT TO "LONG" IN SCHEMA.XML RETURNS PLENTY OF ERRORS. > -> Java errors : A lot of non sense for me, I am not expert in Java. But, with increased memory, it seems not crashing, even if complaining quite a lot in the logs > > Can you elaborate on the errors you have seen so f...

This is a new Centos 5.1 install on a HP nc2400 (that use to run XP). Completely clean install; blew away the XP partitions... After applying all the updates, and configuring for the rpmforge repo, I used yumex to install dkms and the dkms-ipw3945, ipw3945-firmware, and ipw3945d rpms. lsmod|grep ipw shows: ipw3945 180391 1 ieeee80211 33417 1 ipw3945 and dmesg)grep

Little more then a curiosity. Swithcing from Samba 4.2/NT to Samba 4.8/AD, many users complain about they have difficulty to rename files and folder (windows error say 'busy file'). We have added to smb.conf: socket options = TCP_NODELAY TCP_KEEPIDLE=240 TCP_KEEPCNT=4 TCP_KEEPINTVL=15 and this helped a bit, but still in some...

...replication ldap-server1(master) to ldap-server2(slave). If this is right, how does dovecot know which ldap server is currently used? and if the master dies, how does dovecot know and switch to slave one? In addition, which one is the exact behavior of dovecot in case master server dies? 1. only swithcing to the slave server 2. switching to the slave server, and once the master server is reactive then switch back to the master server automatically OS?RHEL4 U3 kernel 2.6.9-34.ELsmp openldap-2.2.13-12.el4 Thanks in advance, Masaharu Kawada ------------------- Masaharu Kawada Associate Global Supp...

Hi all, I have got one query on QoS in bridging in Linux My question is, when we define IP QoS ( using a tc command ) queuing discplines and classses, will these be applicable to bridged frames also ? I mean the packets that take IP path will be sent out according to QoS we defined, but the bridged/ swithced packets will also be sent according to this defined IP QoS classses ? My doubt is

Hi, I finally got fed up with all of vista's crap so i switched to ubuntu and I have a basic understanding of wine and so i got Diable II LOD working under wine but when it loads or swithces resolution the mouse pointer from the desktop or something appears and when its done loading i loose control over the pointer and it just hangs there. Its stuck on the screen and even the diablo cursor is

30 says it's view only in the docs & I can't seem to change it, any other options? > Option 30 allows to set Module Shelf Address/ID.

I tried to compile various version (2.5, 2.6pre1, 3.0alpha17, HEAD,...) of Samba with LDAP support ('configure --with-ldapsam'). During configuration and 'make' process all seams fine, but after I installed ('make install') and ran, Samba complains something similar to "Unknown option: ldap server" and some other similar error messages. It seams that LDAP

I set up a test machine running Red Hat 5.2 and samba version 3.0.28. We have a unix server sharing out a file system. The windows users accessed the file system via Samba and as they all had unix accounts they were just mapped to their UNIX id. As long as we had groups with the same name, the groups were mapped as well. Since going to AD, we would like to do the same thing, but it appears that

Hi, I have managed to test this same transfer reliably with the Linux boxes and open-ssh, but I am in trouble with the OSF1 4.0 (Digital Unix) being the server sending files from a single directory to the HP/UX 11 - being the client The 'sshd2' (and ssh2) in both ends is installed as root (and starts probably from 'rc') The 'rsync' (2.4.6) in both end is just

...e this. >> >> -> The UID returned by SOlr is to be considered as a STRING (and that >> is maybe the source of problem of the "out of bound" errors in >> fts_solr dovecot, as "long" is not enough) > *This is just highly visible in Solr schema.xml. Swithcing it to > "long" in schema.xml returns plenty of errors.* I cannot reproduce this so far (see modified schema below). In a simple test I just get the desired results and no errors logged. >> >> -> Java errors : A lot of non sense for me, I am not expert in Java. >&...

Hello, All services have been successfully migrated to our new facility. Unfortunately, NetSol once again displayed a brilliant inability to grasp a clue using both hands and a suction cup, and informed us they *might* get around to updating DNS records in about two weeks. If we could fax them enough identification. Needless to say, they've lost our business and our domain transfers should

Hello, All services have been successfully migrated to our new facility. Unfortunately, NetSol once again displayed a brilliant inability to grasp a clue using both hands and a suction cup, and informed us they *might* get around to updating DNS records in about two weeks. If we could fax them enough identification. Needless to say, they've lost our business and our domain transfers should

Hello, All services have been successfully migrated to our new facility. Unfortunately, NetSol once again displayed a brilliant inability to grasp a clue using both hands and a suction cup, and informed us they *might* get around to updating DNS records in about two weeks. If we could fax them enough identification. Needless to say, they've lost our business and our domain transfers should

Hello, All services have been successfully migrated to our new facility. Unfortunately, NetSol once again displayed a brilliant inability to grasp a clue using both hands and a suction cup, and informed us they *might* get around to updating DNS records in about two weeks. If we could fax them enough identification. Needless to say, they've lost our business and our domain transfers should

Hello, All services have been successfully migrated to our new facility. Unfortunately, NetSol once again displayed a brilliant inability to grasp a clue using both hands and a suction cup, and informed us they *might* get around to updating DNS records in about two weeks. If we could fax them enough identification. Needless to say, they've lost our business and our domain transfers should