search for: swithces

I have been trying to set up printer sharing on the LAN.All machines are CentOS 5.2 fully updated. The problem server is a fresh build. The box it is replacing worked fine for many months. The problem appears to be a closed port 631 on the new box. iptables and ip6tables are stopped as shown by the output below. To confirm I was using nmap correctly I ran it against the old server first which

hi - i have a randon but recreatable problem whereby my transport.responseText seems to get truncated. I have tried swithcing btwn onSuccess and onComplete buit it happens on both. As i said it''s totally random. any ideas ? what other info di i need to provide ? many thanks --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to

when i tail -f my log: i find this: "Completed in 0.00233 (428 reqs/sec) | Rendering: 0.00005 (2%) | DB: 0.00118 (50%)" i am sure, this request didn''t access DB. but why here DB is (50%) it''s log wrong or my fault? regards -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hello everyone, i have been searching the whole day, trying ANY solution offered by the internet and before headbanging against the wall would like to try asking for your help. As many others, i am haveing problems loading the Rcmdr package with Macbook running Tiger 10.4.11. X11 version updated to the last one after having manually installed. I have also installed (obviously) the Rcmdr package

> *- Installation:* > > -> Create a clean install using the default, (at least in the Archlinux package), and do a "sudo -u solr solr create -c dovecot ". The config files are then in /opt/solr/server/solr/dovecot/conf and datafiles in /opt/solr/server/solr/dovecot/data On my system (Debian) these directories are wildly different (e.g. data is under /var), but other than

This is a new Centos 5.1 install on a HP nc2400 (that use to run XP). Completely clean install; blew away the XP partitions... After applying all the updates, and configuring for the rpmforge repo, I used yumex to install dkms and the dkms-ipw3945, ipw3945-firmware, and ipw3945d rpms. lsmod|grep ipw shows: ipw3945 180391 1 ieeee80211 33417 1 ipw3945 and dmesg)grep

Little more then a curiosity. Swithcing from Samba 4.2/NT to Samba 4.8/AD, many users complain about they have difficulty to rename files and folder (windows error say 'busy file'). We have added to smb.conf: socket options = TCP_NODELAY TCP_KEEPIDLE=240 TCP_KEEPCNT=4 TCP_KEEPINTVL=15 and this helped a bit, but still in some situation (where surely there's only one user in that

Dear team, I'm sorry if this is a stupid question, but I'd like to know the behavior of dovecot in a particular stuation. My questions are as follows. In /etc/dovecot-ldap.conf, 'hosts=' field is the one which can be used to specify availabled ldap server to access from the clients to authorize. And also sevral ldap servers can be specified in 'hosts =' field as shown

Hi all, I have got one query on QoS in bridging in Linux My question is, when we define IP QoS ( using a tc command ) queuing discplines and classses, will these be applicable to bridged frames also ? I mean the packets that take IP path will be sent out according to QoS we defined, but the bridged/ swithced packets will also be sent according to this defined IP QoS classses ? My doubt is

Hi, I finally got fed up with all of vista's crap so i switched to ubuntu and I have a basic understanding of wine and so i got Diable II LOD working under wine but when it loads or swithces resolution the mouse pointer from the desktop or something appears and when its done loading i loose control over the pointer and it just hangs there. Its stuck on the screen and even the diablo cursor is under it (I have full control over the diablo cursor) This is not a huge problem but it does...

30 says it's view only in the docs & I can't seem to change it, any other options? > Option 30 allows to set Module Shelf Address/ID.

I tried to compile various version (2.5, 2.6pre1, 3.0alpha17, HEAD,...) of Samba with LDAP support ('configure --with-ldapsam'). During configuration and 'make' process all seams fine, but after I installed ('make install') and ran, Samba complains something similar to "Unknown option: ldap server" and some other similar error messages. It seams that LDAP

I set up a test machine running Red Hat 5.2 and samba version 3.0.28. We have a unix server sharing out a file system. The windows users accessed the file system via Samba and as they all had unix accounts they were just mapped to their UNIX id. As long as we had groups with the same name, the groups were mapped as well. Since going to AD, we would like to do the same thing, but it appears that

...c-nohang.patch included - the client side is still missing it Tthe patch included in the OSF side did not have any affect on the trouble. The terminal 'ssh' connection between the machines works OK. The 'scp' works also (though a bit slowly ...) I have tried many combinations of swithces, but e.g.the normal single directory sync: ./rsync -e /usr/local/bin/ssh --rsync-path=/usr/users/rem_usr/bin/rsync rem_usr@rem_host:/usr/users/rem_usr/cpy_src/ ./cpy_target/ executed on HP/UX 11 side seems to be hanging. It seems that the 'rsync' transfer will start but it may hang witho...

(forgot to CC mailing list) Op 26/01/2019 om 20:07 schreef Joan Moreau via dovecot: >> >> >> *-?Bugs?so?far* >> >> -> Line 620 of fts_solr dovecot plugin : the size oof header is >> improperly calculated ("huge header" warning for a simple email, >> which kilss the index of that considered email, so basically MOST >> emails as the

Hello, All services have been successfully migrated to our new facility. Unfortunately, NetSol once again displayed a brilliant inability to grasp a clue using both hands and a suction cup, and informed us they *might* get around to updating DNS records in about two weeks. If we could fax them enough identification. Needless to say, they've lost our business and our domain transfers should

Hello, All services have been successfully migrated to our new facility. Unfortunately, NetSol once again displayed a brilliant inability to grasp a clue using both hands and a suction cup, and informed us they *might* get around to updating DNS records in about two weeks. If we could fax them enough identification. Needless to say, they've lost our business and our domain transfers should

Hello, All services have been successfully migrated to our new facility. Unfortunately, NetSol once again displayed a brilliant inability to grasp a clue using both hands and a suction cup, and informed us they *might* get around to updating DNS records in about two weeks. If we could fax them enough identification. Needless to say, they've lost our business and our domain transfers should

Hello, All services have been successfully migrated to our new facility. Unfortunately, NetSol once again displayed a brilliant inability to grasp a clue using both hands and a suction cup, and informed us they *might* get around to updating DNS records in about two weeks. If we could fax them enough identification. Needless to say, they've lost our business and our domain transfers should

Hello, All services have been successfully migrated to our new facility. Unfortunately, NetSol once again displayed a brilliant inability to grasp a clue using both hands and a suction cup, and informed us they *might* get around to updating DNS records in about two weeks. If we could fax them enough identification. Needless to say, they've lost our business and our domain transfers should