Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "switchcor".
Did you mean:
switchcore
2023 Apr 06
1
[Bridge] [PATCH v2 net-next 2/6] net: dsa: propagate flags down towards drivers
...today), add "bool static"
It is probably too late today (now I have a Debian based VM that can do
the selftests), but with this bug fix I have 1) not submitted bug fixes
before and 2) it probably needs an appropriate explanation, where I
don't know the problem well enough for general switchcores to submit
with a suitable text.
2023 Apr 06
1
[Bridge] [PATCH v2 net-next 2/6] net: dsa: propagate flags down towards drivers
...atic"
>
> It is probably too late today (now I have a Debian based VM that can do
> the selftests), but with this bug fix I have 1) not submitted bug fixes
> before and 2) it probably needs an appropriate explanation, where I
> don't know the problem well enough for general switchcores to submit
> with a suitable text.
Do you want me to try to submit this change as a bug fix?
2023 Mar 31
1
[Bridge] [PATCH v2 net-next 6/6] selftests: forwarding: add dynamic FDB test
...course on the embedded target. In that case I
think it would be a very good idea to do something to design the system
better, so that it frees memory between the subtests.
If all tests are always run on the bridge only, I think they don't make
much sense as these patchsets are directed towards switchcores.
2006 Apr 10
1
Link for winnut?
Hello
All links I can find for winnut are not responding.. Anyone got a
working link or maybe can send the package to me privately?
/Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsuser/attachments/20060410/717c77a2/attachment.html
2023 Mar 30
2
[Bridge] [PATCH v2 net-next 2/6] net: dsa: propagate flags down towards drivers
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 04:54:19PM +0200, Hans Schultz wrote:
> I don't know if you have a solution in mind wrt the behaviour of the
> offloaded flag if it is not to do as it does now and let the bridge age
> out dynamic entries. That led me to conclude that this patch-set cannot
> use the offloaded flag, but you seem to suggest otherwise.
>
> If you have a suggestion, feel
2023 Mar 30
2
[Bridge] [PATCH v2 net-next 6/6] selftests: forwarding: add dynamic FDB test
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 09:07:53PM +0200, Hans Schultz wrote:
> Not true, it reveals that I forgot to put it in the patch, that's all. As
> I cannot run several of these tests because of memory constraints I link
> the file to a copy in a rw area where I modify the list and just run one
> of the subtests at a time. If I try to run the whole it always fails
> after a couple of
2023 Mar 31
1
[Bridge] [PATCH v2 net-next 6/6] selftests: forwarding: add dynamic FDB test
...h isn't necessary for the end goal.
I simply have no clue what you're talking about. It's as if we're talking
about completely different things.
> If all tests are always run on the bridge only, I think they don't make
> much sense as these patchsets are directed towards switchcores.
Is this supposed to mean something, or is it just a random thought you
had, that you believed it would be good to share with us?
The tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/lib.sh central framework has
the NETIF_TYPE and NETIF_CREATE variables, which indicate that by default,
veth interfaces ar...