search for: switchcore

...today), add "bool static" It is probably too late today (now I have a Debian based VM that can do the selftests), but with this bug fix I have 1) not submitted bug fixes before and 2) it probably needs an appropriate explanation, where I don't know the problem well enough for general switchcores to submit with a suitable text.

...atic" > > It is probably too late today (now I have a Debian based VM that can do > the selftests), but with this bug fix I have 1) not submitted bug fixes > before and 2) it probably needs an appropriate explanation, where I > don't know the problem well enough for general switchcores to submit > with a suitable text. Do you want me to try to submit this change as a bug fix?

...course on the embedded target. In that case I think it would be a very good idea to do something to design the system better, so that it frees memory between the subtests. If all tests are always run on the bridge only, I think they don't make much sense as these patchsets are directed towards switchcores.

Hello All links I can find for winnut are not responding.. Anyone got a working link or maybe can send the package to me privately? /Martin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsuser/attachments/20060410/717c77a2/attachment.html

On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 04:54:19PM +0200, Hans Schultz wrote: > I don't know if you have a solution in mind wrt the behaviour of the > offloaded flag if it is not to do as it does now and let the bridge age > out dynamic entries. That led me to conclude that this patch-set cannot > use the offloaded flag, but you seem to suggest otherwise. > > If you have a suggestion, feel

On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 09:07:53PM +0200, Hans Schultz wrote: > Not true, it reveals that I forgot to put it in the patch, that's all. As > I cannot run several of these tests because of memory constraints I link > the file to a copy in a rw area where I modify the list and just run one > of the subtests at a time. If I try to run the whole it always fails > after a couple of

...h isn't necessary for the end goal. I simply have no clue what you're talking about. It's as if we're talking about completely different things. > If all tests are always run on the bridge only, I think they don't make > much sense as these patchsets are directed towards switchcores. Is this supposed to mean something, or is it just a random thought you had, that you believed it would be good to share with us? The tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/lib.sh central framework has the NETIF_TYPE and NETIF_CREATE variables, which indicate that by default, veth interfaces are...