search for: switch1

Hi, I'm having trouble starting a VM with vhostuser interfaces. I have a simple configuration where a VM running Debian has 1 vhostuser interface plugged into an OVS switch where a DPDK interface is already plugged in. $ ovs-vsctl show: Bridge "switch1" Port "switch1" Interface "switch1" type: internal Port "1.switch1" Interface "1.switch1" type: dpdk options: {dpdk-devargs="0000:0b:00.0"} Port "0.switch1" Inter...

...gt; Hi, > > I'm having trouble starting a VM with vhostuser interfaces. > > I have a simple configuration where a VM running Debian has 1 vhostuser > interface plugged into an OVS switch where a DPDK interface is already > plugged in. > $ ovs-vsctl show: > Bridge "switch1" >     Port "switch1" >         Interface "switch1" >             type: internal >     Port "1.switch1" >         Interface "1.switch1" >             type: dpdk >             options: {dpdk-devargs="0000:0b:00.0"} >    ...

Dear All, I have the following CPU info on my asterisk server: Linux switch1.domain.net 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5 #1 SMP Tue Dec 16 12:03:43 EST 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux I need to install G729 on the asterisk server just to pass through and not for encoding...Which G729 package do you advice me to install? I tried several packages with no luck Regards -------------- next pa...

I have read several articles for setting up a network bridge. My configuration is: WorkStation --> Switch0:VLAN1 --> Switch1:VLAN1 --> bridge --> Switch1:VLAN45 --> Laptop I am running CentOS 4.3 on the bridge #> brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces br0 8000.0030843e5aa2 no eth1 eth2 I followed the instructio...

...MTU. Oddly enough, 802.1q tagged frames get properly fragmented and defragmented, allowing for a maximum MTU of 1500 (1504 with the tag, I assume). Untagged frames larger than 1462 bytes will not make it through the GRE tunnel setup. 192.168.200.6 192.168.200.2 (802.1q switch1)<->(eth0-br0-gretap)<->(gretap-br0-eth0)<->(802.1q switch2) 10.0.0.0/12 is my 'untagged' subnet. (default vlan 1, untagged) 192.168.7.0/32 is my tagged subnet. (vlan 800, tagged) The host I use to test has a NIC in each subnet and is hooked to switch1, it is pinging hos...

...l, what is the signalling of IAX? Currently I want to connect two switch through IP using asterik signaling, and I want to transfer SS7 over IP (between the 2 asterisk), will IAX can transfer SS7 signalling through IP (like TDMoIP does) If no which solution can I use? see below the architecture switch1-------------Asterisk--------------------------Asterisk --------------------------Switch E1 IP E1 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20100123/3bd9a003/at...

.... > > : You may also want to look into hot switch statement splitting, though I > don't know if it should really go into the partial inliner. This is > splitting a switch statement into multiple switch statements if there are > only a few cases that are actually hot. > > SWITCH1: > switch(val) { > HOT: ... > COLD1: ... > COLD2: ... > .... > COLDN: ... > default: ... > } > > would get transformed into: > > > SWITCH1: > switch(val) { > HOT: ... > default: > br SWITCH2: > } > > SWITCH2: > switch...

...a o: Telbit description: Disco 80GB (SATA) dn: cn=sdb,cn=metropolis,ou=sistemas,dc=telbit,dc=pt objectClass: top objectClass: device cn: sdb o: Telbit description: Disco 80GB (SATA) dn: cn=dvd,cn=metropolis,ou=sistemas,dc=telbit,dc=pt objectClass: top objectClass: device o: Telbit cn: dvd dn: cn=switch1,ou=sistemas,dc=telbit,dc=pt objectClass: top objectClass: device objectClass: ieee802Device objectClass: ipHost cn: switch1 description: HP Procurve Switch 2524 macAddress: 00:0A:57:0C:F7:80 ipHostNumber: 192.168.30.200 o: Telbit dn: ou=projectos,dc=telbit,dc=pt objectClass: top objectClass: organ...

...el => 1 [root at pbx ~]# -------- Out put of zap show pbx*CLI> zap show channels Chan Extension Context Language MusicOnHold pseudo from-pstn-celte 1 from-pstn-celte 2 outgoing 3 outgoing 4 outgoing switch1*CLI> zap show status Description Alarms IRQ bpviol CRC4 Wildcard TDM400P REV H Board 1 OK 0 0 0 pbx*CLI> ------------ Extract of /etc/asterisk/extensions.conf [analog-incoming] exten => s,1,Answer exten =>...

...And we don't need to have auto-managed netdevs locked into the ":" prefix at all (I intentionally left it out in the this RFC patch to ask for comments on the namespace solution which is much cleaner). That said, an userpsace named device through udev may call something like ens3 and switch1-port2, but in the kernel-net namespace, it may look like ixgbevf0 and mlxsw1p2. So if we all agree introducing a new namespace is the rigth thing to do, `ip link' will no longer serve the purpose of displaying the information for kernel-net devnames for the sake of avoiding ambiguity and names...

...:18:24.718Z|00330|dpdk|WARN|VHOST_CONFIG: failed to connect > > to /opt/oa/vhost/0.vm.sock: No such file or directory > > 2018-02-22T09:18:24.718Z|00331|dpdk|INFO|VHOST_CONFIG: > > /opt/oa/vhost/0.vm.sock: reconnecting... > > 2018-02-22T09:18:24.718Z|00332|bridge|INFO|bridge switch1: added > > interface 0.vm on port 5 > > > > > > Am I missing something on the openvswitch or on the libvirt side? > > > > It looks like openvswitch can't find /opt/oa/vhost/0.vm.sock, but isn't > > either openvswitch or libvirt in charge of creating...

Hi Jessica, Thanks for the feedback. I believe the existing partial inliner pass does use some common utilities like the code extractor to do outlining. Is that what you're referring to? I don't recall seeing any other passes that has outlining other than the machine outliner, but I may have missed something. I briefly looked at River's RFC and it seems he's mainly utilizing

From: David Ahern <dsahern at gmail.com> Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 11:21:54 -0600 > It is a netdev so there is no reason to have a separate ip command to > inspect it. 'ip link' is the right place. I agree on this. What I really don't understand still is the use case... really. So there are control netdevs, what exactly is the problem with that? Are we not exporting enough

From: David Ahern <dsahern at gmail.com> Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 11:21:54 -0600 > It is a netdev so there is no reason to have a separate ip command to > inspect it. 'ip link' is the right place. I agree on this. What I really don't understand still is the use case... really. So there are control netdevs, what exactly is the problem with that? Are we not exporting enough