Displaying 20 results from an estimated 916 matches for "swigging".
2006 Mar 26
3
Updating tools
Hello all. I decided to see how things were progressing and have
updated my Swig to 1.3.29 and my wxWindows to 2.6.3. I''ll try
rebuilding everything as soon as I''m done compiling wx 2.6.3. Then I
hope to have some time to read up on the new ruby stuff in Swig to see
if we can close the last few holes.
Roy
2004 Mar 30
12
Big question: Move to SWIG?
A few days ago, someone asked me why I am using wxpp instead of SWIG.
The question prompted me to revisit and re-evaluate SWIG, and I now
believe it would be best to convert wxRuby to SWIG.
SWIG has greatly improved its C++ support since the last time I looked
at it, and I think its Ruby support has improved quite a bit as well.
Also, now that I have written wxpp, I understand the nature of
2004 Apr 10
5
wxRuby-SWIG 0.0.3 is available
REMINDER: wxruby-swig is an experimental rewrite of wxRuby, using SWIG.
It is not yet useful. The official wxRuby is still at 0.2.1.
The 0.0.3 release of wxruby-swig is able to run the "minimal.rb" sample,
which includes menu event handling. As always, it is available at:
http://qualitycode.com/repos/wxruby-swig/
I also created a tarball this time, so you can just download that and
2005 Feb 20
11
Suggestion for wxruby name change
We''ve had some discussion in the past about the wxruby vs wxruby-swig
name, and how they are a bit confusing. My big problem with
''wxruby-swig'' is that unless you know what ''swig'' is, it''s not a
terribly useful (or sexy) postfix. It''s like naming a car after it''s
manufacturing process - "the all new Acura
2005 Jul 31
5
SWIG compilation
The result of the compilation after installing swig results in lots of
errors of the sort:
WindowDisabler.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol
_SWIG_Ruby_ConvertPtr
I can see this is defined in rubydef.swg but I''m not sure why this isn''t
just included in the files that need it. Can any swig experts tell me
what I need to do to progress? I''m using
2007 Aug 23
0
Re: [Swig-devel] license issue
Just re-posting so swig-devel get so see it.
It's an architectural solution whereby swig has the power to banish licensing conflicts that may exist between any imported library and the target system for which swig is generating a module.
-----Original Message-----
From: "Sam Liddicott" <sam@liddicott.com>
To: "Alexander Lind" <malte@webstay.org>; "William
2004 Sep 28
9
Open call to try wxruby-swig
Hi Everyone,
Over the past couple of weeks wxruby-swig has made a lot of progress.
Over 100 classes have been added with attempts to mimic the existing
wxruby interfaces. While still not as stable as wxruby, stability has
increased dramatically. Finally, it has been built on Linux, Mac, and MSVC.
This email is an invitation to try out wxruby-swig for yourself. The
source code is in CVS and
2005 Oct 09
0
[Fwd: Re: [Swig] Re: Object return problem]
Forwarded from the SWIG mailing list, so we have a copy in our archives.
Kevin
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Swig] Re: Object return problem
Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 18:31:40 -0400
From: Kevin Smith <wxruby@qualitycode.com>
To: Charlie Savage <cfis@interserv.com>
CC: Swig@cs.uchicago.edu
References: <4347277E.1030700@mindspring.com>
2004 Dec 17
14
WxRuby-SWIG and WxWidgets 2.5.x
A while back there was a discussion about what version of WxWidgets to
target with WxRuby-SWIG. I don''t remember seeing any resolution, but I
gather that thus far WxRuby-SWIG has continued to target 2.4.2, with
the thinking that WxRuby-SWIG would quickly mature to the point that it
could replace WxRuby, and once that was done the focus would shift to
working with 2.5.x.
2007 Mar 17
0
[883] branches/wxruby2/wxwidgets_282/swig: API changes for move to WxWidgets 2.8
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /><style type="text/css"><!--
#msg dl { border: 1px #006 solid; background: #369; padding:
2004 Aug 27
4
SWIG Bug
In trying to add wxTextCtrl to wxruby-swig, I''ve been running into a
problem with the argument conversion that appears to be a SWIG director
bug. It is tied to multiple inheritance, and is related to SWIG
specifically making director''s ''initialize'' take a first argument, but
because ''initialize'' is static there isn''t a self value
2007 May 28
0
[1033] trunk/wxruby2/swig: GC fixes for nested sizers; fix crashes in html.rb demo
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /><style type="text/css"><!--
#msg dl { border: 1px #006 solid; background: #369; padding:
2006 Sep 03
9
Patch files to implement AcceptFocus
These files add the virtual function AcceptFocus that was missing from
wxWindow.h. In order to make things right I had to make sure it was
also declared in all the places where wxWindows also changes it. Also,
in wxTextCtrl on Windows GetDefaultAttributes needs to be redeclared. I
haven''t downloaded the Unix and Mac headers for 2.6.3 so I couldn''t see
if it also applies
2005 Oct 09
1
[Fwd: Re: [Swig] typemap + default argument bug?]
(Mostly for Roy):
I saw this on the SWIG list, and wonder if it might be related to the
problems we have been seeing where multi-arg typemaps end up invoking
the wrong wrapper methods. (Not the newly-discovered directorout stuff).
Perhaps if we switched to "compactdefaultargs" things would start to
work more sanely. Looking at this section of the SWIG docs, it looks
like it should
2004 Apr 04
5
SWIG update
I have a minimal working version of a SWIG-based wxRuby that can bring
up an empty Frame with a title.
On my system, it crashes on exit. I suspect this is the same problem
that I mentioned months ago when I first upgraded to wxWindows 2.4.2.
The problem mysteriously vanished at some point, but now it is back. I
fiddled with this new code for several frustrating hours, and couldn''t
2006 Apr 18
12
Update on SWIG
SWIG 1.3.29 isn''t going to cut it for us. We''ll have to wait until
1.3.30, unless I can hack together a nasty workaround for a problem with
the object tracking. It seem that each SWIG module gets its own hash
for tracking objects. This means that, for example, you create a find
dialog (in FindReplaceDialog.cpp) events you get from it (from
FindDialogEvent.cpp)
2007 Jul 04
0
[1108] trunk/wxruby2/swig: Revised mem mgmt for Sizers to address more GC crashes in Sizers demo
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /><style type="text/css"><!--
#msg dl { border: 1px #006 solid; background: #369; padding:
2004 Aug 25
3
wxclasses-2.4.2.xml
I couldn''t find the original tex document that the author of the xml
file converted from. Anyone knows where it is?
I am toying with the idea of _not using_ the xml file. Either getting
the wx header files thru SWIG (I assume you guys have thought about this
before already, any specific problems?), or continue with the template
generator in the current wxruby-4.0.
The RUBY port of
2005 Aug 08
4
wxruby2 swig retooling "complete"
I just re-integrated fixdeleting.rb, the last of the post-processors.
Running minimal.rb no longer segfaults on exit. Running dialogs.rb and
immediately exiting doesn''t segfault, but bringing up a dialog and then
exiting does.
So there are still memory problems, but fewer than yesterday :-/ I''m not
sure how it compares to last week.
I probably won''t have much time
2004 Aug 08
7
wxruby-swig progress report
Hey everybody,
I''ve made some progress on wxruby-swig, and have some good news and some bad
news.
The good news is that the MSVC version finally can run all of the samples provided in
CVS. I''m using the same solve-by-ignore solution to the GC problem that wxruby uses,
so there is far less crashing goin'' on. Depending on the next few weeks, we might be
able to