search for: swathed

Hi, I sent the message below a couple of months ago but I got no reply. Now that there's more activity perhaps someone could kindly provide me some guidance. Theora is great and the developers are doing a wonderful job, so I'd like to implement the codec in a way which does it justice... Original post: I wrote a plugin to enable LiVES (a video editor) to encode theora/vorbis/ogg files.

Hi, I wrote a plugin to enable LiVES (a video editor) to encode theora/vorbis/ogg files. I'm looking for some advice towards improving quality. If someone would like to help me test this please note that you'll need MPlayer, ImageMagick, sox, the encoder_example from libtheora (somewhere in the PATH), and Python 2.3.0 (this is fairly all standard stuff). Consider the following clip:

Hi, I sent this message to the theora list but I'm not sure if it got through (activity seems to be very low, regardless). I'm hoping I have better luck here. I wrote a plugin to enable LiVES (a video editor) to encode theora/vorbis/ogg files. I'm looking for some advice towards improving quality. If someone would like to help me test this please note that you'll need MPlayer,

I am challenged to bring up a 5 nodes Linux/w2k small LAN and following samba server step by step by Ying Zhang to implement this. inetd.conf that should contain a line like: swat stream tcp nowait: 400root/user/sbintcp swath is not found at /etc/ where else can i find it. Francis Boro Nigeria

On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 9:53 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > As I said in my first email perhaps the TTI->FTTI transition is a good > place to start working here without having to worry much about redoing huge > swaths of llvm. FWIW, TTI is next on my hit list for porting to the new pass manager. In order to work in that world, the entire thing needs to

On 31 May 2016 at 16:02, Dilan Manatunga <manatunga at gmail.com> wrote: > Just to verify, a 16-bit divion of INT16_MIN by -1 results in INT16_MIN > again? No, "sdiv i16 -32768, -1" is undefined behaviour. The version with an "sext" and "trunc" avoids the undefined behaviour and does return -32768. > If the issue only occurs in this case, why

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Rsync server A is the master server, Servers B and C are is different parts of the world, and are set to mirror server A on a regular basis, but at different actual times (due to TZ differences). Server D is mirroring Server B. We'd like to change Server D to be mirroring Server C instead. Previously when I've swapped between servers

Hi, I spent a lot of time with Puppet Enterprise and like it. Lately, I''ve been doing Open Source Puppet. The question has come up: does OSP have any kind of web-facing methodology for applying one or more patterns against swaths of instances? Do tell me we don''t have to roll our own with cli going to a web front-end we have to design. Stuart -- You received this

Hi, Im using R-2.8.1 on windows vista and have 4GB RAM. Im trying to run LDA from the MASS package on a fairly large dataset and keep running out of memory ("Cannot allocate vector of size ...) Ive tried freeing up as much memory as possible with gc(). I tried using the ff package but that would need modifications to the way LDA accesses the memory mapped data. The error I get is

Hello list, I've got a client who's weak sip passwords are being guessed by remote entities who then connect to their server and use it to wardial large swaths of numbers. When they start receiving complaints, they call me and I add the ip address of the remote user to the iptables drop list. At the same time, my own personal asterisk server, using strong sip passwords, has seen

Hi, > 1.1) Please verify all above change(s) are OK? or I have modify some code? Parts will almost certainly have to change in future, but if it builds that's an excellent first step. > 1.2) In LLVM, can we proceed our development like as GCC i.e. incremental > approach? In case of yes, please provide me any reference. Incremental is definitely possible. I started out with

On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 08:35:44PM +0000, Jamie Burchell wrote: > Can RH put a stop to projects like Rocky Linux? Yes, in two possible ways. First, Red Hat could stop making RHEL. The amount of work that goes into this is _quite_ significant, particularly in terms of the long-term stability that everyone is very excited about. Rebuild projects would then have nothing to rebuild. But, Red Hat

On 03/02/2016 10:42 AM, Mark Milhollan wrote: > I understand that some people might be trying to cherry-pick their > updates and the assertion that doing so is not supported. But that is > not the only way in which --security can be used and it is a bit boring > to continually see whining about the assumptive use. > > For me it is about scheduling -- it would answer the

I am trying to gauge how much interest there is in supporting non-8- bit byte targets. Other than myself, Ken Dyck of ON Semiconductor has a 24-bit machine he is trying to support. We have been working jointly on this but we are also both new to Clang and LLVM. Although both of our processors are not mainstream, Ken points out that Texas Instruments the C5000 series is also 16-bit

On 03/03/2016 02:58 PM, Mark Milhollan wrote: > On Wed, 2 Mar 2016, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 03/02/2016 10:42 AM, Mark Milhollan wrote: > >>> I wish --security was functional > >>> I hope that the lack is not due to >>> the assumed use resulting in it being ignored. >> >> That is not the reason, > >> We do not have enough space

Hi all, llvm newbie here. I'm trying to learn porting with llvm for study purpose. This is my first query on llvm mailing list.I have some idea about GCC. I choose 'rx' as a target to port as it is also available in GCC. I have done some initial changes with llvm source code to register target with llvm. I need to verify these changes. Can anyone please take a chance to verify it.

Hello all! I'm working on a library with bignum support, and I wanted to try LLVM as an apparently simpler and more portable system to my current design (a Haskell script which spits out mixed C and assembly). Porting the script to use the LLVM bindings instead of the current hack was pretty easy. But I have a few remaining questions: (1) Are bignums exposed to any higher-level

Is the ABCD pass ready for stress testing? If so, we can do some of this. I guess it would be ready for stress testing if: - it already works fairly well for moderate-sized inputs - someone is willing to act on bug reports Thanks, John Regehr

On 31 May 2016 at 15:42, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: > A 16-bit division of INT16_MIN by -1 is undefined behaviour but the > original ext/trunc version is well-defined as 0. Sorry, INT16_MIN again actually. The main point still stands though, I think. Tim.

Just to verify, a 16-bit divion of INT16_MIN by -1 results in INT16_MIN again? If the issue only occurs in this case, why aren't there checks to see if we can simplify sdiv in cases where we know that numerator is not INT16_MIN or the denominator is not -1. For example, we could simplify divides involving one operand constants. Is it because this case is most likely rare? -Dilan On Tue,