search for: svitkin

...OptionGroup, and would then only work on cl options in that group. Would this approach be preferable? -Alexei On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Evan Cheng <echeng at apple.com> wrote: > I don't have any opinions about this. Chris? > > Evan > On Feb 17, 2009, at 8:00 PM, Alexei Svitkine wrote: > >> The motivation behind this patch is that tools that use LLVM as a >> library and want to use its command line parsing facilities may not >> want all the various options defined in the LLVM libraries to be >> available - simply because they may not be relevant...

I don't have any opinions about this. Chris? Evan On Feb 17, 2009, at 8:00 PM, Alexei Svitkine wrote: > The motivation behind this patch is that tools that use LLVM as a > library and want to use its command line parsing facilities may not > want all the various options defined in the LLVM libraries to be > available - simply because they may not be relevant. > > This pat...

The motivation behind this patch is that tools that use LLVM as a library and want to use its command line parsing facilities may not want all the various options defined in the LLVM libraries to be available - simply because they may not be relevant. This patch adds an optional "Prefix" parameter to ParseCommandLineOptions(). If set, this will make inaccessible any options that do not

...linking against that I don't care about. (Perhaps a utility function can be added to disable everything, and then I can just enable what I'm interested in). -Alexei On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 12:14 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > On Mar 4, 2009, at 12:15 AM, Alexei Svitkine wrote: >> >> I was thinking about this more, and perhaps a more preferable solution >> would have some kind of OptionGroup parameter to constructors of cl >> options. This would of course be optional, with the default being a >> global one. > > Hi Alexei, > &...

On Mar 4, 2009, at 12:15 AM, Alexei Svitkine wrote: > I was thinking about this more, and perhaps a more preferable solution > would have some kind of OptionGroup parameter to constructors of cl > options. This would of course be optional, with the default being a > global one. Hi Alexei, Sorry for the delay, I've been swam...