Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "svitkine".
2009 Mar 04
2
[LLVMdev] Patch: Prefix for ParseCommandLineOptions()
...OptionGroup, and would then only work on cl options in
that group. Would this approach be preferable?
-Alexei
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Evan Cheng <echeng at apple.com> wrote:
> I don't have any opinions about this. Chris?
>
> Evan
> On Feb 17, 2009, at 8:00 PM, Alexei Svitkine wrote:
>
>> The motivation behind this patch is that tools that use LLVM as a
>> library and want to use its command line parsing facilities may not
>> want all the various options defined in the LLVM libraries to be
>> available - simply because they may not be relevant....
2009 Mar 04
0
[LLVMdev] Patch: Prefix for ParseCommandLineOptions()
I don't have any opinions about this. Chris?
Evan
On Feb 17, 2009, at 8:00 PM, Alexei Svitkine wrote:
> The motivation behind this patch is that tools that use LLVM as a
> library and want to use its command line parsing facilities may not
> want all the various options defined in the LLVM libraries to be
> available - simply because they may not be relevant.
>
> This patc...
2009 Feb 18
2
[LLVMdev] Patch: Prefix for ParseCommandLineOptions()
The motivation behind this patch is that tools that use LLVM as a
library and want to use its command line parsing facilities may not
want all the various options defined in the LLVM libraries to be
available - simply because they may not be relevant.
This patch adds an optional "Prefix" parameter to
ParseCommandLineOptions(). If set, this will make inaccessible any
options that do not
2009 Mar 09
1
[LLVMdev] Patch: Prefix for ParseCommandLineOptions()
...linking against that I
don't care about. (Perhaps a utility function can be added to disable
everything, and then I can just enable what I'm interested in).
-Alexei
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 12:14 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
> On Mar 4, 2009, at 12:15 AM, Alexei Svitkine wrote:
>>
>> I was thinking about this more, and perhaps a more preferable solution
>> would have some kind of OptionGroup parameter to constructors of cl
>> options. This would of course be optional, with the default being a
>> global one.
>
> Hi Alexei,
>
&g...
2009 Mar 09
0
[LLVMdev] Patch: Prefix for ParseCommandLineOptions()
On Mar 4, 2009, at 12:15 AM, Alexei Svitkine wrote:
> I was thinking about this more, and perhaps a more preferable solution
> would have some kind of OptionGroup parameter to constructors of cl
> options. This would of course be optional, with the default being a
> global one.
Hi Alexei,
Sorry for the delay, I've been swamp...