Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "surem".
Did you mean:
sure
2013 Feb 20
0
[LLVMdev] [RFC] NoBuiltin Attribute
...calls without pessimizing the function you inline into
Con: you pessimize all indirect calls in functions with at least one
nobuiltin requirement
2) annotate functions
Pro: you don't penalize indirect calls
Con: you either penalize functions that are inlined into, or you avoid
inlining.
Now, surem , I would guess the number of indirect calls that end up being
simplified is probably fairly small (though I don't really have a clue)
which would err in favor of (1), but I just wanted to be clear what we're
trading off.
Were there any other options being considered or benefits/drawbacks...
2013 Feb 20
3
[LLVMdev] [RFC] NoBuiltin Attribute
On 2/20/2013 10:19 AM, David Blaikie wrote:
>
> I'm still not understanding a few things in this thread, including one
> here: if you annotate only the calls to print (say) then how do you
> handle the indirect calls that the back end might yet optimize down to a
> constant & then attempt to simplify? Would all indirect calls be
> annotated with all the unsimplifiable