search for: surem

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "surem".

Did you mean: sure
2013 Feb 20
0
[LLVMdev] [RFC] NoBuiltin Attribute
...calls without pessimizing the function you inline into Con: you pessimize all indirect calls in functions with at least one nobuiltin requirement 2) annotate functions Pro: you don't penalize indirect calls Con: you either penalize functions that are inlined into, or you avoid inlining. Now, surem , I would guess the number of indirect calls that end up being simplified is probably fairly small (though I don't really have a clue) which would err in favor of (1), but I just wanted to be clear what we're trading off. Were there any other options being considered or benefits/drawbacks...
2013 Feb 20
3
[LLVMdev] [RFC] NoBuiltin Attribute
On 2/20/2013 10:19 AM, David Blaikie wrote: > > I'm still not understanding a few things in this thread, including one > here: if you annotate only the calls to print (say) then how do you > handle the indirect calls that the back end might yet optimize down to a > constant & then attempt to simplify? Would all indirect calls be > annotated with all the unsimplifiable